Evidence keeps piling up as to the machinations that this council undertakes in the name of ‘community consultation’ – especially in relation to structure planning. The latest example is the draft Glen Huntly Structure Plan.
Tuesday night’s ‘debate’ on whether or not to accept the draft was stage managed to perfection. With Silver absent this created the potential for a tied 4-4 vote on whether to proceed with consultation or to reject the draft plan. The final vote was 5 to 3 to exhibit with Hyams, Esakoff and Sztrajt voting against exhibition and Magee, Athanasopolous, Cade, Delahunty and Davey voting to go ahead.
Not for the first time Magee outdid himself. Anyone listening to his comments would surely have come away with the view that he was opposed to exhibition. But no! He VOTED FOR, in spite of all such comments as: Council has to be ‘very very careful’; Glen Huntly is ‘charming’; there already are ‘lot of flats a lot of units’; to grow futher ‘ would be detrimental to that strip if the structure plan was implemented the way it is currently written’ and finally ‘let’s make sure we save Glen Huntly so that in 10 or 15 years time Glen Huntly looks like Glen Huntly’. Had Magee voted against, as his comments implied, then Esakoff would have had the deciding vote and the draft would have been knocked back. As we said, stage managed to perfection!
But that’s not all. Consultation is now going ahead and the questions asked of residents could not be any more vague and useless. Here are the pertinent questions after the usual demographic options such as sex, age, connection with Glen Huntly. Direct questions on the draft structure plans itself are:
What do you like about the draft Plan?
Are there opportunities for change?
Do you have any other feedback?
How did you hear about the draft Structure Plan and the opportunity to provide feedback? Please select all that apply.
Not once in the opening blurb are residents told:
- 10 storeys is proposed in one spot and between 6 and 8 for others
- How many properties will be rezoned from 2 or 3 storeys to 4 storeys
- Which height limits are discretionary and which are mandatory
- That Glen Huntly is already the most dense suburb in Glen Eira
By way of contrast we provide the following example from a current consultation by Kingston. Whilst not brilliant, residents are at least provided with options that they can prioritise and comment upon. Also worth noting is that residents are specifically given the option of development density and scale plus the question: Please describe what need to be protected most when planning for the future of Chelsea! Questions that Glen Eira would not dare to ask because they know that the majority of residents are opposed to 10 storeys!
Countless other processes are missing whenever this council pretends to undertake community consultation. For instance:
- No Discussion Papers outlining the pros and cons are presented
- No background studies on traffic, parking, business, etc are done to accompany and inform the consultation
This approach is consistent in all council’s ‘consultations’ and stands in stark contrast to the way that other councils go about involving their communities. Glen Eira does not have consultation worthy of that name. What we have is a carefully managed show where decisions are made behind closed doors and then the data or questions are skewed to find the ‘evidence’ that supports the predetermined decisions.
June 14, 2020 at 5:42 PM
Nobody in Glen Eira wants 8-storey towers, let alone 10-storey!!! And it’s not necessary to build such towers to accomodate population growth. Why does Council want to trash Glenhuntly like this?
June 15, 2020 at 3:05 PM
Becuase they are helping out their gov and developer mates.
June 15, 2020 at 11:37 AM
The only results that will be close to credible from this kind of survey are how old you are and how often you come to the area. All the rest will be manipulated to show that people don’t mind ten stories so let’s do it.
June 16, 2020 at 8:49 AM
Let’s hope we get a new council elected in the coming election that’s considers sacking the CEO and replacing her with someone that will start expressing what the council’s surveys show. The new CEO hopefully will root out the officers that are delivering this overdevelopment faint accompli to their back door mates.
Let’s face it, if Magee thinks his piss-poor rhetoric is having an effect on the officers behavior, he is totally deluded and likely hiding something. It’s time for the residents of Tucker to move this buffon to the never-never.
June 22, 2020 at 5:44 PM
Having just read the Draft Glen Huntly Structure Plan, apart from spelling Glen Huntly Road as Glenhuntly throughout the whole document which is incorrect, which I think is a omen for all the other mistakes and whitewashing that does follow.
There is no mention of the present densities in percentage terms which just shows they are too chicken to mention the real fact that Glen Huntly is 78.8% medium to high densities to compare with 33% in Greater Melbourne in 2020.
If the GE Council is not willing to be upfront with the reality of the present the integrity of this Draft Plan falls at the first hurdle and is totally lame from then on, with the racecourse so close to Glen Huntly it should be taken over there and shot to put it out of its twisted misery.
It may well have been written by Council for the people, by the bureaucrats for the developers, so Glen Huntly shall perish from this earth, for the profit of a few.
This is a sham document written and presented by amateurs.