Below are two items from this week’s Caulfield and Moorabbin Leader newspapers. Readers are urged to compare and contrast the comments by the Bayside councillor versus the comments by Lipshutz. Draw your own conclusions.
Church plan cut to size
Fears remain high for impact on area
SCALING back a ‘‘ monstrous’’ development in Elsternwick has done little to quell residents’ fears of traffic and congestion chaos.
Glen Eira councillors voted to allow Contour Consultants to develop t he site at 233-247 Glenhuntly Rd and the historic church at 12 Ripon Grove.
The original plan for a three-to 10-storey building with seven shops and 130 apartments was reduced to eight storeys and 95 apartments at last Tuesday’s council meeting.
Plans to convert the church into 21 apartments were reduced to 18.
Elsternwick resident Kirsten Wright said she was disappointed.
‘‘It’s still too high,’’ Ms Wright said. ‘‘It will still dominate the area and the impact on traffic and public transport will still be huge.’’ The plans have drawn 80 objections and 20 letters of support, while they have been dubbed a ‘‘planning fiasco’’ in an online community forum, Glen Eira Debates.
Many residents also fear overcrowding, loss of privacy, and the building blocking views and sunlight (‘‘Living in high anxiety,’’ Leader, September 6). Mayor Steven Tang and Cr Oscar Lobo voted against the amendment, both wanting to reduce the building’s height further.
Cr Michael Lipshutz said the State Government had indicated Elsternwick was a high diversity housing area, with its proximity to public transport.
‘‘ Having council reject it or knock it back will no doubt create clapping in the public gallery,’’ he said.
‘‘But they’ll not be happy when VCAT comes along and says take it as it was.’’
Contour Consultants did not respond to our calls before deadline.
********************************************************************************************
‘Biggest ever’ battle hots up
BAYSIDE Council will spend up to $100,000 fighting a proposal for a massive development on Cheltenham’s border at the state planning tribunal. Around 120 residents packed the council chambers last Tuesday to oppose the area’s biggest-ever proposed development. The plan to build nearly 500 dwellings, with 900 car spaces, a medical centre, and serviced hotel on a five-block Bay Rd site attracted 1103 objections and one letter of support.
Developer Magnus Floden took the application to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal after the council did not make a decision within the prescribed time.
Councillor Alex del Porto said the application’s huge size, complexity and number of objections made it virtually impossible to process within the allocated 60 days. Councillor James Long said the council needed to fight the $200 million-plus plan with all its might. ‘‘(The developers’) legal counsel will fight this as if it was a war because profit is the motive,’’ he said.
Developer Mr Floden did not return the Leader’s phone calls.
September 29, 2010 at 12:53 PM
I can’t believe what I’m reading and that these words came from the mouth of a councillor we elected. I’ve always thought that those I voted for were there to protect my interests not that of developers. What VCAT decides is totally irrelevant. Decisions shouldn’t be made on the basis of what will happen in the future and at VCAT. Maybe if this council and in particular Lipshutz put up more of a fight on behalf of residents then developers would think twice about appealing. Time is on the side of residents. Each day would cost them thousands perhaps. Yet Lipshutz rolls over time and time again and hands decisions on a plate to these people. So much for the ‘hard decisions’ he claims he makes.
September 29, 2010 at 3:53 PM
What a total bunch of wimps. looks like we simply dont matter its the rates that will come in from thousands and thousands of high density places. Money before people as always and you can bet your bottom dollar that lipshutz doesnt live anywhere near an activity centre so what does he care
September 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM
In the past few days we’ve received several emails from people who assert that on recent planning applications these are the words spoken by councillors, but which of course never appear in any minutes. We’re reproducing them having been doubly assured that they are accurate –
LIPSHUTZ:…..if we reject this application it will go to VCAT and we know what VCAT is going to do…..
LOBO:… we should be mindful of the residents themselves…we should fight for the residents and when it comes to delivering we don’t take them into account…
September 29, 2010 at 6:30 PM
The real test of course will come with council’s reaction to the c60 planning report and then the community will really see whether we’re dealing with wimps as someone suggested, or whether there is any backbone to these councillors. But even on this the situation is dicey. They can reject and thus escape all criticism if Madden moves and puts the rubber stamp on the development. One needs to go back further into history and ask why council didn’t fight like hell much earlier on. This land has been sitting there and was/is ripe for the picking. The tragedy is that Newton and councillors have literally done nothing to protect the public interest in this issue. We should expect a lot of posturing when the officers finally get around to table something. Or, just a thought, maybe they will delay as long as possible and Madden steps in regardless. Ah the twists and turns of politics and power!
September 30, 2010 at 7:21 AM
Yes, Lipshutz and for that matter Magee and Frank do not live close to high density arears and therefore they are are really not bothered of such developments. Did you know that Frank does not live in Glen Eira?? The statement “looks like we simply dont matter its the rates that will come in from thousands and thousands of high density places” is untree as the apartment owners do not pay rates! Lobo compared the okaying of 10 stories to possible Twin Towers in future to which Lipshutz said “nonsense” that such recurrence will not take place in Melbourne.
October 1, 2010 at 9:03 AM
“Frank does NOT live in Glen Eira? ”
Are you serious?
I think you will find this is wrong, but I am not 100% sure, does anyone know the real answer?
MODERATORS: Frank Penhalluriack does not live in Glen Eira. He runs a business in the municipality and hence is a ratepayer and entitled to stand as councillor. It should also be noted that this business has been of long, long standing.
October 1, 2010 at 12:37 AM
We need to ask Lips-shut, that the definition of a Professional is? Do you think he can define the word? He would know what is baffle, waffle, muzzle, puzzle and diesel.