We’ve received this comment from Streuth and decided to put it up as a full post.
Streuth Steven, Gee you do get yourself into a bother don’t you? You do want the truth but can you handle it? Here it is the way I see it. You don’t bother to communicate with people when they want you to communicate with them; you don’t respond to emails; you don’t respond to voice mail. You only pontificate on those things that you think people need to hear without listening to what they’ve got to say first of all.
And what do people complain about? That the council including administration and including each councillor do not listen to residents views. We wanted change, change in the culture of the council that has been around now for ten years. The opportunity was there at the time of the CEO appointment because the CEO creates, controls, and spreads the culture. At the reappointment time there was a choice. A clear choice between advertising for a change, or continuing along the same course for another 5 years. Instead we got a total compromise of extension for two years. A disaster for all involved. As a result we got a third municipal investigation. What a catastrophe!
Tell me how does a young whippersnapper like you become so arrogant? How can you even mutter the following words that the Herald Sun (Jan, 11th) picked up: “Glen Eira Council needed a new start, and what says new start better than a young face?” Hells bells Stevey boy, to be Mayor takes a lot more than a ‘young’ pimply face! Besides, you’re so sure of yourself aren’t you? So disdaining of others’ points of view? So who is the guilty party? Who is the culprit? You are Steven. You proposed the compromise! Everything then was stuffed up. Newton went to lawyers, and the bill to residents reached over $40,000 – at least!! Tell me Stevey, what would have been so wrong with advertising the position? Don’t tell me that there’s anything wrong with testing the waters out there? Perhaps Glen Eira might have got an absolute champion. But your decision to compromise was the start of everything. Newton fought like hell, and lawyers licked their chops. What a stuff up of gigantic proportions!
Now let’s get to real business. You complain about character assassination. I’m not talking about Mr. Steven Tang. He is an undoubtedly a nice guy, clever, articulate (if a little verbose). I’m talking about Cr. Tang – the Mayor, our leader, our saviour, our representative!! The checklist that was put up a few weeks back on this site is what I’m talking about. How do you reckon you go on that checklist Stevie? Do you really believe that as Mayor you have done justice to the majority of those criteria? Well, I had a really close look at this checklist and awarded you, as Mayor, the following scores –
Governance: 15/75 which equals 40%. A fail Steven. Why you ask? What have you done about leading and supporting councillors? And I love the bit about ‘inspiring’ others. You’ve inspired them all the way to the Municipal Inspector. Instead of ensuring ‘effective communication’ we’ve had one councillor resign under your watch and conflict between administration and councillors. Great stuff, great governance!
Next is chair of council. This is your only pass mark Stevie – 13/25 equalling a bare pass mark of 50%. Have you really promoted high standards of democracy and ‘internal governance’? Sorry mate, no way!
Then there’s ‘supporting the community’. Oh woe is us on this criteria – a dismal 12/30 which equals another fail at 40%. How can you advocate on behalf of the community’s needs, when you don’t even know what these needs are cos there’s never been any attempt on your part to really find out! As to community governance and enterprise, of course not. That would go against the grain of autonomous organisations beyond the ken of council.
In the end Stevie boy, you might be a bright spark at Uni, but as a Mayor there’s a lot left to be desired. Let’s call a spade a shovel shall we and state that in your reign things have only gone from bad to worse. Oh by the way if you doubt any of my marks then just ask – I’ve got plenty of arguments to put forward that will conclusively prove my judgements.
Of course your failure is in actual fact not just your failure but the team’s failure – that is, the nine councillors and the CEO. I do not believe that it was you that lead to this behaviour, although I said it was your fault, I do not believe it was only you. A mentor, much more experienced than you, much more politically minded and getting much more out of being a Councillor than you. And that person is of course the powerbroker and ‘kingmaker’ – Cr Lipshutz. As the saying goes, with a ‘mentor’ like this, who needs enemies.
October 9, 2010 at 8:25 PM
We are witnessing a repetition of 2005. Then councillors asked the state government to cover potential legal costs for breach of contract. When that didn’t eventuate they rolled over, tail between their legs. Now they’re asking ratepayers to fund their incompetency once more. There would not have been ‘legal fees’ if they hadn’t created the necessary conditions in the first place. Let them pay out of their own pockets!
October 10, 2010 at 12:01 AM
Didnt they all get sacked in 2005?
Deja Vue!
October 10, 2010 at 4:46 PM
Watcher you are not entirely correct. Not all Councillors requested or required Legal Cost Indemnity. Ask Esakoff and Hyams if they required Indemnity?
October 12, 2010 at 3:38 PM
Interesting reading. In 2005 all being sacked, does anyone have the names?
October 13, 2010 at 7:58 PM
Does anyone on this blog realise that Councillors can talk all they like but the only real decisions that count are those voted upon at Council meetings. Has anyone seen a resolution authorising payment of legal fees? May be I missed it! I have checked Council Minutes and there is no such resolution. No doubt some Councillor raised it and no doubt it was knocked on the head
October 13, 2010 at 8:06 PM
What a lot of codsweallop. I watched Whiteside when she was mayor and what a hopeless job she did. Tang is intelligent and principled. I think he has been a great example. Under Tang there have been more public consultations than ever before – hows that for transparency. What about Lipshutz – kingmaker no way . He jus seems to get it right more often than not. He is only 1 out of 9. No one forces Councillors to vote his way and he lost a few last Tuesday. How about taking a hard look and realising he says it as it is and gets things done. What about Hyams – it seems that he too has a lot to say. This Council is really getting on with the job. The only weak link is Lobo who pontificates but says nothing. Don’t forget Esakoff who leads the charge on inappropriate development. From where I sit in the gallery there is no one Councillor who dominates. It looks like a team effort to me
October 13, 2010 at 10:35 PM
It seems clear that you are looking at things through “rose colored glasses”. The reality is there are factions in the council and the team work is non existent. It’s a matter of conform or be conformed. There are a core group of people and as an observer you will see it in their body language, that continuously pat each others ego’s, slyly smile and gesture to each other like a group of organized bullies at a primary school. Ganging up and picking off the weaker ones. Talk about divide and concur. Take those glasses off and look at what is really happening.