Council slashes funds
A lobby group finds finance for childcare centres has been cut by $400,000
FREEDOM of Information documents obtained by a childcare lobby group show Glen Eira Council has been stripping funding from childcare centres since 2006.
Save Local Childcare Coalition spokeswoman Bronwyn Burton said the documents show ‘‘the council has slashed a $500,000 investment in 2006/07 to $95,000 in 2009/10’’.
A petition to save the Elsternwick Children’s Centre will be handed to the council this month.
More than 900 residents and traders have signed the petition after the council announced the closure of the Kooyong Rd centre in May. The building’s owner, Alfred Health, said it could not extend the centre’s lease beyond December. The council, which has ruled out buying the building or finding a replacement, voted in October to lobby the State Government to ensure land continued to be used for child care.
In a letter sent this month, Glen Eira Mayor Margaret Esakoff reiterated the council’s interests to Alfred Health. Alfred Health chief executive Andrew Way said the board of directors was ‘‘cognisant of the problems caused by the uncertainty’’ around the centre. ‘‘The board of directors has asked me to explore with the Victorian Department of Health ways in which this uncertainty can be overcome more quickly than the currently anticipated timescale of June/July,’’ he said.
COMMENT: Our new members of Parliament should take careful note of this report. Glen Eira’s tactics have always been to ‘pass the buck’ onto State and Federal Governments or taking the Clayton’s approach of ‘action’ such as ‘advocating’ and ‘making representations’ to authorities. Perhaps if State and Federal funding to Council was also cut by $500,000 then the blame game would stop and Council would be forced to budget appropriately and responsibly.
+++++++++++++++
Drain blame game
Climate changes after flow map revealed
GLEN Eira Council has slammed Melbourne Water’s drainage system and defended its response to flash floods which wreaked havoc across the city. Mayor Margaret Esakoff has called for a r eport into the February 4 event, and is seeking ‘‘urgent attention’’ from the water authority and the Government to improve main drains to reduce repeated flooding.
The report will cover damage to Glen Eira properties, response times, Melbourne Water and the council’s drainage maintenance programs and Melbourne Water’s plans to reduce flooding in riskprone areas. It follows nearly a decade of council lobbying after Melbourne Water released a map of areas which would experience ‘‘overland flows’’ during intense rainfall because the capacity of the drains would be exceeded.
‘‘The flooding of housing and businesses which occurred on February 4 closely matched this map,’’ a council report said. More than 100 Glen Eira homes were significantly affected. Cr Michael Lipshutz said Melbourne Water needed to ‘‘get its act together’’. ‘‘We are seeing climate change and we’re seeing more flooding in our areas,’’ Cr Lipshutz said.
Cr Esakoff had admitted that the council had not adequately responded after outraged residents slammed its ‘ ‘ slow and uncoordinated’’ reaction. But at last week’s council meeting, she did a backflip, saying: ‘ ‘ Since then, information reviewed showed that this was not the case. The council was not slow to respond’’. But Melbourne Water floodplain manager Phillip Neville said Melbourne’s drainage system ‘‘does a great job’’. ‘‘We saw in excess of a one-in-500year storm in some parts of Melbourne,’’ Mr Neville said. ‘‘ An event of that magnitude would stretch the capacity of any drainage system.’’
THOUGH authorities have touted the recent flood as a ‘‘one-in-500-year storm’’, Glen Eira residents will tell you otherwise. Downpours cause repeated flooding in parts of the municipality, including the underpass on Normanby Rd near Caulfield racecourse and Boyd park in Murrumbeena.
Councillor Michael Lipshutz said his neighbours had been flooded four times in 12 months while Cr Jim Magee’s Bentleigh street has been flooded twice.
In 2000 Melbourne Water, responsible for nine drainage systems in Glen Eira, released a map identifying areas expected to flood because the capacity of drains would be exceeded. Those areas include streets west of Orrong Rd in Ripponlea, streets either side of Hawthorn Rd south of Glenhuntly Rd, between Glenhuntly and Koornang roads in Carnegie, and between Murrumbeena and Poath roads in Murrumbeena. Melbourne Water floodplain manager Phillip Neville said when new properties were built, ‘‘ they’re built to a standard which would lessen the consequences if flooding does occur’’
COMMENT: We repeat our previous questions. How much of the flooding is a result of lack of maintenance of COUNCIL’S DRAINS and not Melbourne Water’s? How much of the flooding could have been avoided? Will Council produce a map of the drains under its responsibility? And if Council performed so ‘adequately’, then surely it can’t be mere coincidence that in the Tender Section of Saturday’s Age newspaper we find this advertisement: “Contract No.: 2011.014 Provision of Reactive Drain and Pit Cleaning Services
Requirement: Provision of stormwater drain/pit cleaning, jetting and root cutting services using a purpose built combination vehicle to supplement Council’s own service. Three year contract with an option on the part of Council to extend for a further period of two years”.
+++++++++++++
Letters to the Editor
Take public open land discussion seriously
GLEN Eira Council (councillors and administration) should be publicly pilloried for their appalling response to the Victorian Environment Assessment Council discussion paper on public open land.
Glen Eira, which has the least public open space in Melbourne and numerous highly paid executives, should have been able to put together a detailed submission that was more than a hastily written onepage letter that lacked substance. Neighbouring councils and individual residents prepared detailed submissions – why didn’t Glen Eira Council?
March 1, 2011 at 12:04 PM
Here are some facts on how many kms of drains were cleaned throughout the financial year according to council’s Annual Reports.
2007/8 – 33km
2008/9 – 30 km
2009/10 – 25 km.
Why the decrease? especially given weather patterns over the past 3 years and the increase in building.
March 1, 2011 at 2:00 PM
It is appropriate that the question of why there has been a consistent decrease in the cleaning of drains be raised. I would take this even further and question whether or not this decrease has had any impact on the recent flooding. If the answer is “no” to the latter, then the next question that requires answering is why is council spending a large amount of money on something that has no obvious benefit?
Another thought that occurs to me is that I am continually seeing mulch laid down by council either completely covering drains, or clogging them as happened on Nov. 4th. What role did this practice have in the events of that Friday?
March 1, 2011 at 12:23 PM
How bloody typical. Creative accounting at its best – that’s what Newton is terrific at. Rip funds out of one thing and sidle them across to something else and no one knows what is going on. Looks great on paper and he can boast about how much this council spends on infrastructure and capital works. But the figures are all shonky. How does library collections get into the above categories in annual budgets for a starter. It’s all a game. Anything to hide the truth and make the bureaucrats look good. Oh yeah, mustn’t forget the fact that when funding is slashed from kindas and other things that the only departments not to undergo such slashings are of course administration costs and staffing. That is sacrosanct and forever increasing. Under Newton 21 per cent increase in staff I believe. Now that surely deserves full investigation and accounting for!
March 1, 2011 at 2:26 PM
When will the Leader start doing its job properly and produce articles that are consistent with the facts. Apart from the statement that Esakoff did a ‘back flip’ the rest of Ling’s feature is all about laying the blame at the door of Melbourne Water. A couple of week’s ago there was the claim by residents of Cadby Ave that council had not visited them until Thursday. Esakoff claimed this was incorrect. Well, did the Leader follow up on this “correction” by Esakoff. I’d lay bets that the Cadby Residents know well and truly when the first council rep. set foot anywhere near them. Why are Esakoff’s claims simply accepted without double checking and then publishing whatever comes out of the checking? Or is this more of the same – the Leader can’t afford to be too critical of their major money source! Woeful stuff and gives investigative journalism a huge slap in the face.
March 1, 2011 at 10:36 PM
The reason for the decrease in drain cleaning has to do with Drain Traps which are being installed in our City. Also Smart Aleck you don’t have a clue. When the Pool Complex is completed tens of new positions will be created generating additional income.The new Carnegie Library also requires more staff. As the City grows and new Community Assets are provided they require more Staff. Any fool knows that. Also Councils Annual Accounts are Audited by the Victorian Auditor General and are subject to Australian Accounting Standards and Accounting Priciples. Any fool knows this except Smart Aleck. You just hate Andrew Newton and his fantastic ,dedicated staff.
March 2, 2011 at 11:13 AM
Gosh it would be nice if for once Anon you actually were au fait with the facts before you started to laud Newton and his henchmen. Let’s get a couple of things corrected right at the start. You claim that Drain Traps are being installed and therefore the decrease in cleaning of drains. Well, according to the annual report the figures for the number of drain traps in 2008/9 and then in 2009/10 were identical. Hence the increase is a big fat zero!!!!! Yet in this same period there has been a 5km DECREASE in cleaning. So, if they’re not installing new traps then why aren’t they cleaning more kms?
As for your arguments about new staff, again these are pathetically lame arguments. How many actual jobs will be created and how many of these jobs will go to locals? Again, have a look at figures. The number of qualified librarians used by Glen Eira is one of the lowest throughout all municipalities!!! Libraries are open for 211 hours per week and yet the ratio of qualified librarians is way below what other councils have.
Oh yeah, and then there’s the Annual Accounts auditing. Terrific! It doesn’t demolish my argument that budgets are all about smoke and mirrors and that Newton is fantabulous in doing this. What do I hate? I don’t hate anything except the fact that Glen Eira is an autocracy with all the inbuilt failings of such systems. Get used to it Anon – his and Burke’s days are numbered.
March 2, 2011 at 10:38 AM
Today’s Moorabbin Leader – Letter to the Editor by Mayor Esakoff.
Thanks to those who kept flood aid flowing I HOPE and trust that all victims of the recent flooding (in Ormond and McKinnon) have been able to begin the overwhelming task of rebuilding their lives, and I take this opportunity to thank the people who have assisted those in need during this time of crisis.
In the Leader of February 16, the article ‘‘Floods fall-out fury’’ reported that I had admitted the council had not adequately responded to the floods.
For clarification, mycomments to the flood victims were that if residents had not been responded to quickly, or at all, that would indicate a failure of the communication chain council relies on.
On further investigation, it appears that all calls for assistance logged with emergency services (152 properties) were in fact responded to by council either on the Monday or Tuesday, with additional information going out after that – a total of 621 information packs, with drainage crews also out for the 24-hour period from the Friday-Saturday nights.
The emergency management procedures were diligently followed by officers, providing information, assistance and support to the local community, particularly in relation to financial assistance, accommodation, clean-up advice, counselling, personal support and waste removal.
To ensure that no stone is left unturned in the quest to make certain that our emergency response mechanisms, our maintenance procedures and risk reduction are the best they can be, I have requested a report investigating all these factors, which will be publicly available.
March 2, 2011 at 10:46 PM
Smart Aleck the purchase of Library Collectables are considered as a Capital Purchase because they are Depreciable Assets under Accounting Principles and Standards. If Council were to treat these purchases in any other way the Independant Auditor General would qualify Council’s Financial Report.Also the Budget belongs to the Councillors who vote on it in open Council. I have never seen Andrew Newton or Mr Burke vote on any issue. Have you?
March 2, 2011 at 11:22 PM
Really & truly? Then how come Port Phillip doesn’t list library collections under Capital projects? All you’ll find there is money for design of building – not books!!
March 3, 2011 at 10:36 PM
They don’t because they are all illiterates in Port Phillip and incapable of purchasing books. I don’t know or care about PP but I do about Glen Eira. I suggest you extract the digit and write to the Internal Auditor,the Audit Committee and the Victorian Auditor General.
March 5, 2011 at 2:29 PM
I finally had power restored to 1/3 of my house yesterday after the storms of 4 Feb. The water that went under the house had affected one circuit but at least I had two others working.
I do hope continued pressure is brought to bear on Council over drain cleaning. The drains in my street haven’t been cleared in years, so the water naturally went to the lowest points, which mostly was the basement carpark of a ubiquitous 3-storey developments 50m to the east of me. It wasn’t enough to save me though, and hope the cars that started to float are ok.
Council is responsible for one other factor that hasn’t been discussed, which is the loss of permeable ground. From GEPS: “At least 20 per cent of the site should not be covered by impervious surfaces.” And why? “To reduce the impact of increased stormwater run-off on the drainage system.”
Council routinely has waived non-compliance with the associated standards, clearly without considering the capacity of the stormwater drainage system, when issuing permits for high-density developments in a single area.
In doing so it has been negligent, and letter-writing to others doesn’t absolve them.