Dear MBA members,
By way of background, it is worth pointing out that we (MBA Executive) have always had one major issue with the Council’s decision and that is that throughout their process we were continually told that any submission we put forward had to offer at least $50/court/hour. Given that this was substantially higher than we currently pay, we felt it important to seek the view of our delegates and that view was, unanimously, that the MBA could not afford these rates. Consequently we advised Council that we would not enter a proposal at those levels. It is easy to see, therefore, why we were so dismayed to learn that Council had in fact accepted an offer from a much smaller Association (presumably with far less capacity to pay) at a rate much less than $50/hour. Had Oakleigh offered Council $50+ then we would still be questioning council on the grounds on which the allocation was made particularly around community benefit and hours of operation, since we were told we needed to scale back our proposal and the justifications given for being unsuccessful simply did not add up.
We have been actively lobbying Glen Eira Council to persuade them that the exclusion of McKinnon Basketball Association from GESAC is nonsensical. Council have sought support from Basketball Victoria to facilitate a mediation between Oakleigh and McKinnon in order to determine whether there is the possibility of agreeing a means by which both organisations could use the space. This mediation will take place soon. In the meantime, in an attempt to see if we could shortcut the process, we approached the Warriors direct to see if we could agree a way forward between ourselves. We made it clear that the only workable joint allocation of time would have to see McKinnon occupy the facility on Saturdays. The Warriors subsequently presented a proposal to us which provided us with Saturdays but whereby they would be granted access to two existing McKinnon courts on a Saturday as well as a number of other conditions. Whilst we felt there was a workable way forward with most of the conditions, several were simply unworkable. Consequently we have respectfully declined the offer and will move ahead with the mediation process.
Some of you may have read an article in The Saturday Age last weekend which suggested that members of the McKinnon Executive had in some way promised to reward Councillors with votes at the next election if they grant access to GESAC to McKinnon. The quote used in the paper was taken from an email to Councillors which Council have confirmed was NOT provided to the Warriors under the Freedom of Information Act as the article suggests. It remains a mystery as to how the Warriors came into possession of this email but suffice to say that the quote was accurate but taken out of context. The article also suggests that Jim Magee, among other Councillors, has been in some way retained by McKinnon to help fight our cause. This is simply not true. McKinnon Executive members have had one meeting with Jim Magee, which he instigated, several months ago when he first heard that we had not been successful in our application. Since then there has been appropriate lobbying but nothing more. These suggestions are inflammatory but nothing more; we pride ourselves on our professionalism and have at all times simply sought to promote McKinnon and our programs as the most logical basketball occupant of this great new facility.
Rest assured that we will continue to put forward the case for McKinnon and will engage enthusiastically in the mediation in an effort to achieve the best outcome for McKinnon and basketball in general.
MBA Executive.
Source: http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?client=1-4059-0-0-0
November 17, 2011 at 5:48 PM
All along we’ve been told that price was the determining factor in Burke’s offer to the Warriors. Now we learn that the stated bargaining point of $50 per court per hour was not even met by the Warriors. Does this then mean that a local basketball group lost out because someone bid maybe $5 more per hour? Loyalty to residents is going dirt cheap. The other possibility is that if the Warriors bid also fell way below $50 then Burke didn’t do his homework and really investigate the longterm viability of the group.
November 17, 2011 at 6:56 PM
I’m amazed at the events which have taken place over this. Mediation is only now happening. Why? This should have been the first step instead of council running off to lawyers and costing ratepayers heaps of money. If Newton and Burke can’t get a simple allocation right then I’ve no confidence that they’ve managed a $50m enterprise well either.
November 17, 2011 at 9:21 PM
This was no bungle, the contract went to just the people the gang of 4 wanted
It had nothing to do with money as you are slowly finding out
It’s just up to you guys to work out why this is so.
History, events & alliances, and even choice of one set of colours over another should point in the right direction
Looking for stuff-ups where there is none is just a smoke screen to lead you up the garden path
The gang of 4 want the warriors for reasons they couldn’t possible disclose
November 17, 2011 at 9:57 PM
What a load of crap. The letting of the courts was done under delegation. The Councillors would be told zip until they were informed of the winning bid. If you are going to contribute then I suggest you try a lot harder.
There is no gang involvement here, it is a straight up staff balls up.
November 17, 2011 at 10:50 PM
Is that a smoke screen I smell