Buried on page 23 of last week’s Glen Eira Leader is the mandatory public notification of the Special Council Meeting to consider the budget and Council Plan. With typical efficiency, no such announcement features on Council’s website!
We again highlight the following low lights of this budget:
- Another 6.5% increase in rates plus exorbitant increases to rubbish collections and child care fees
- More and more staff so that well over 60% of rate revenue goes to paying staff
- More and more ‘contractors’ so that the staffing bill is astronomical – over $81,000,000 in the coming year
- The continuing decline in council subsidies for Pensioner Rebates and real expenditure on drains, traffic management and footpaths/roads
- Millions upon millions spent on pavilions (Duncan McKinnon), regrassing ovals, concrete plinthing, and toilets barely 10 years old. We simply ask whether ‘refurbishing’ or ‘redevelopment’ could not replace the total demolition of some of these pavilions?
At last council meeting Tang spoke of the necessity of ‘prioritising’ and looking at council’s ‘ideology’. We note that Tang has been in council since 2006 as has Lipshutz. Hyams was first elected in 2003, and again in 2008. Esakoff has been a constant since 2003. All the rest have had basically 4 years to figure out and change ‘ideology’ and to do some real ‘prioritising’. Fiddling with the budget as happened last year is like moving deck chairs on the Titanic. It just meant a slight hiccup and delay in the grand plan. The old goals, objectives, and agendas are still in place. The ‘ideology’ that these goals represent (ie more development, more taj mahals, more secrecy, and more extravagances) are the antithesis of the views expressed by residents. These councillors either will not, or cannot change the ‘ideology’. Only the October elections can achieve this.
PS: As an afterthought, the most pertinent question to consider would be: what have these councillors actually achieved in nearly 4 years? Our ‘answer’ has to be ‘not much’. For example:
- GESAC running over time and losing money hand over fist
- The failure to carefully supervise Paul Burke in his allocation of the basketball courts to the warriors and then backing him to the hilt and Lipshutz’s claim that councillors should not be ‘hand on’!
- Booran Rd Reservoir – empty and not resourced for another 4 years at least despite Glen Eira having the lowest open space ratio per capita in the state
- Centre of the Racecourse – a cave-in and not a word about anything for nearly a year
- C60 – a total cave in to the MRC by the gang of four
- Carbon reduction figures – still non-existent after years and years of talking about it
- Community consultation still only given lip service to
- Transparency and accountability – non existent
- Secrecy on the rise with councillors continually gagged
- A planning scheme that hands carte blanche to developers
- The reappointment of Newton
- Categorised as a ‘ high risk’ council for the first time
- Hocked to the gills for the first time
- Advisory committees that remain ‘closed shops’ – no published agendas; paltry minutes and bar one committee – no community reps.
- No Notice of Motion; no recission provision; agenda set completely by CEO
- Continual doctoring of minutes
- Expenditure on pavilions that remain commercial failures
- Failure to adequately address traffic and parking
- Failure to address flooding potential
- Scandal after scandal – Municipal inspectors, heritage farce, ombudsman inquiries, lawyers on easy street, etc.
June 18, 2012 at 10:55 PM
Have to say that the list of non achievements is pretty impressive. I’d like to add – no tree registers after years of talking and no community gardens after more years of talking. I’m sure I’ve left out plenty of other “achievements”.
June 19, 2012 at 8:02 AM
The community garden would fit nicely in the centre of the race track. All that organic fertiliser from the horses make it an ideal location.
June 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM
a good point. Lots of free fertilizer and also the fruit and vegies would not be too high for race viewers. Probably one negative is that the MRC really intend to use the centre as a car park as they are building apartments on the current crown land car park.
June 19, 2012 at 8:31 AM
Like Colin, I’d like to add to the non achievement list – silence over GESAC opening, just what is happening with the liquified damages claim and despite residents crying out for Council to address traffic and parking issues the budget only includes provision for four speed humps.
Interestingly, I hadn’t realised how long Tang, Lipshutz, Hyams and Esakoff had been on Council. When you combine this with the length of time the senior administration has been there – it explains a lot. A chummy, manipulative relationship has developed and unfortunately that chummy relationship is all about giving the administration what it wants rather than giving the residents what they want. The evidence abounds – could someone please given me an example of just one time when residents views actually made a difference in Council’s predetermined stance.
Governments (as proved around the world and at all levels) have a limited life span, the more time in office the more distanced from the electorate they become and the more they focus on themselves. The above 4 Councillors and the senior administration have lost sight of their original community service aspirations and are well passed their use by date.
If residents want change the change needs to start with outing those 4, then getting the new Council not to re-appoint the Administration.
June 19, 2012 at 9:27 AM
‘A planning scheme that hands carte blanche to developers’
Im not asking for the exact address of councillers or Newton but could someone give us a ball park of where they live to see if some of these developments have been built next door to them. My guess is none of them live in Dudley Street or Rosstown Road.
June 19, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Worth mentioning that today’s leader doesn’t have any public announcement about the special council meeting but it does have another full page ad for gesac.
June 19, 2012 at 10:49 AM
gosh that should buy a lot of pro council propaganda! probably be hearing something else about Frank as well
June 19, 2012 at 6:40 PM
Council’s supposed to pay half for fencing in some areas. Anyone find this in the budget? How much and where have they hidden it? Another swabey/newton creative bit of accounting so we don’t know a damn thing about anything. More to the point, another brilliant example of negotiating skills and selling out to the MRC