The Hon. Matthew Guy MLC
Minister for Planning
Level 7
1 Spring Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000
Dear Minister,
I am writing to express my concerns about the administration of the Caulfield Racecourse Reserve and the lack of public recreation space available in the Glen Eira area.
According to the City of Glen Eira, despite the lack of public space in the municipality, there is large amount of unused public space available at the Caulfield Racecourse Reserve.
You would be aware that the reserve is Crown Land and currently administered by the Caulfield Racecourse Reserve Trust. The reserve was granted to the people of Caulfield for the provision of not just a racecourse but also for a public recreation ground and a public park. However, while the racecourse is well provided for by the Trust, the other purposes are not.
It is the responsibility of the Trust to ensure that the reserve is set aside for the public enjoyment and use of the people of Victoria, particularly those in the local area. However, the current structure of trust does not allow for good governance and accountability in administration of this public land. In particular, I am concerned that six of the positions on the Trust are filled by members of the Melbourne Racing Club (MRC), which is a tenant of the reserve, and that those trustees may experience a conflict of interest between their roles with the MRC and their duties as trustees.
Therefore, I ask that you take action to ensure the integrity of the Trust. Given that the Trust is responsible for approximately $2billion of public land, the Victorian Auditor General should be its Auditor. To ensure that the Trust is currently operating effectively, the Auditor General should conduct a performance audit immediately.
Furthermore, all bodies that manage Crown Land should comply with the Guidelines for Committees of Management of Crown Land, which are provided by the Department of Sustainability and Environment.
Crown Land is reserved to benefit all members of the public. However, the Caulfield Racecourse Reserve is currently used for commercial purposes including a successful Tabaret. Nearly all income from the use of this public land accrues to a non-public body. The people of Caulfield and Elsternwick would be better served, in my view, if any non-core activities are charged a commercial rent and money reinvested into the provision of not just the racecourse, but also the other mandated purposes, a public recreation ground and public park.
I note that the Victorian Parliamentary Select Committee of the Legislative Council on Public Land Development in its final report in September 2008 found that, “The Caulfield Racecourse Reserve profits to the Melbourne Racing Club have been disproportionately directed to racing users, with inadequate provision for use of public park and recreation users as required by the original Grant,” and recommended, “That the Caulfield Racecourse Reserve Trustees direct a substantial amount from the profits made by the Melbourne Racing Club over many decades to the provision of public park and recreational facilities, including promotion of the public use of these facilities as recompense to the community.”
The City of Glen Eira has the smallest amount of public open space per capita of all Melbourne municipalities. In addition to this, it is predicted that the MRC’s C60 Development, on its freehold land across Station Street from the Racecourse Reserve, is projected to include 1500 dwellings. More effective use of the existing public land at Caulfield Racecourse Reserve can assist alleviating the open space problem in Glen Eira for current and future residents. However, this is not possible until the current Trust structure is operating effectively, to ensure this an immediate performance audit will need to occur.
I would appreciate it if you would consider my concerns and get back to me at your earliest convenience.
Yours sincerely,
Michael Danby
Federal Member for Melbourne Ports
cc. The Hon. Ryan Smith MP
April 28, 2013 at 8:49 AM
In all the years he has been in Parliament Mr. Danby has never been interested in the race track. He is no doubt not only frightened of the prospect of being in Opposition but the idea that he may lose his job is probably keeping him awake. He is dumping press releases all over. His voice may have helped 5 years go. Bit late now. Current odds. ALP $6. Liberal/Nat. $1.12. Nearly as short as Black Cavier.
April 28, 2013 at 10:26 AM
Probably well iiiustrates why a clever Federal Politician stays away from Local Politics.
April 28, 2013 at 7:46 PM
Or why a seat clogger who only gets pre-selection because of his capacity to rally the Jewish vote very rarely does anything remotely useful. Choosing only around election time to take an active interest in matters that might garner a few more votes.
April 28, 2013 at 9:10 PM
Surely the Jewish vote can see through people like Danby
April 28, 2013 at 9:58 PM
You should ask Tim Pallas about the pre-selection. I believe he is the bloke he beat. Tim ended up on a much better wicket.
April 28, 2013 at 6:38 PM
The Auditor should also be asked to probe into why the present three Councillors were appointed by the Liberal Party. Esakoff says she is not a member of the party (however, her husband is) and yet she is seen in the Council voting on issues of party line! What a hypocrite!!
April 28, 2013 at 9:13 PM
Forget the Waterhouse conflict of Interest, (MODERATORS: rest of sentence deleted)
April 28, 2013 at 10:01 PM
Esakoff’s husband is definitely NOT a member of the Liberal Party. Stop spreading lies. You call someone a hypocrite yet you are telling lies.
April 28, 2013 at 9:50 PM
This ain’t the first of the Danby stuff … too little to late and once the guy got off his A and did something it’s been too long a time in between to be effective or have any credibility.
A real disgrace … the points made are valid and it’s definitely time the Trustees and management of $16b worth of crown land was changed to actually ensure sound management. Danby’s re-election efforts should not be allowed to deflect from the real issue. The real issue being the blatant inept and mismanagement of the valuable crown land and the need to focus on the community’s needs and the community’s use of their land.
April 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM
Danby is at least consistent. Pakula’s parliament comments were a joke.
May 6, 2013 at 2:09 PM
A strong rumour going around, is that the Minister for Local Government Jeanette Powell, has written to Cr Magee about is conduct as a councillor in relation to the Caulfield Racecourse.
Magee may be considering his future.