“As can be seen, reports are regularly requested. They are submitted promptly – usually to the immediately following Council Meeting”. (6th June 2011). Thus wrote Andrew Newton on why Notices of Motion are not required in Glen Eira.
The Local Government Act, mandates that it is the duty of a CEO to provide council with ‘timely’ advice. Further, he/she is bound to carry out council resolutions expeditiously. This does not appear to have been happening in Glen Eira. We have had discussions with the Victorian Local Governance Association who have informed us that Requests for Reports that become council Resolutions must be tabled at ordinary council meetings. We have also taken the trouble of going through the minutes of the past 5 years in order to determine:
- Why successfully passed resolutions for ‘requests for reports’ have NOT been tabled at Council meetings as required, and
- How long has it taken for those reports which were tabled to be produced?
Our results on the first question are listed below. We have included the dates that the resolution was passed at council. We ask readers to make up their own minds as to how well this administration has acted in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act. We also ask why no councillors appear to have demanded that these outstanding reports be tabled, nor have they requested any explanation for their non-appearance.
Requests for Reports which WERE NEVER TABLED
Crs Staikos/Robilliard
That a report be prepared documenting a recent incident at the Duncan Mackinnon Reserve Pavillion in which it is alleged that a group of people entered the pavillion while unauthorised. That this report document all correspondence related to this issue to date. (16th October, 2006)
Crs Tang/Feldman
That a report be prepared detailing expenditure and programs directed to the Glen Huntly commercial area over the last five years. The report should also include a comparison to the total expenditure directed to Glen Eira shopping precincts in each of those years. (4TH September, 2007)
Crs Lipshutz/Whiteside
That a report be prepared as to the Council depot in Caulfield Park being removed from Caulfield Park to another location in or out of the City (16th October, 2007)
Crs Staikos/Robilliard
That a report be prepared on the operation of Village Committees in the City of Kingston. (27th November, 2007)
Crs Staikos/Robilliard
That a report be prepared on the feasibility of introducing a ban on the sale of ‘silly string’ in conjunction with a ban on spray cans. (18th December, 2007)
Crs Spaulding/Staikos
That a report be prepared into missing sports in Glen Eira, sports clubs that are wholly or in part required to relocate because of a lack of Council facilities within our municipality and within this report the administration to investigate the development of sporting facilities also in partnership with commercial entities and in particular but not limited to Moorleigh Reserve. (5th February, 2008)
Crs Staikos/Robilliard
That a report be prepared investigating ways of expanding Council’s Australia Day celebrations. (5th February, 2008)
Crs Staikos/Spaulding
That a report be prepared about possible improvements to Mackie Road Reserve including, but not limited to: walking path; birdie cage; playground and barbeque area improvements; and the disused land on Orange Street. (29th April, 2008)
Cr Whiteside/Spaulding
That a report be prepared on the status of the draft heritage guidelines such report to include recommendations for best practices to strengthen these guidelines so as to maintain consistency in our heritage areas. (29th April, 2008)
Crs Staikos/Spaulding
That a report be prepared on the provision of bus stop infrastructure in the City of Glen Eira (20th May, 2008)
Crs Staikos/Magee
That a report be prepared on the granting of Tucker Ward funds to Bentleigh Recreation Tennis Club for the purchase and installation of a water tank. (15th December, 2008)
Crs Magee/Tang
That a report be prepared on the Foundation for Youth Excellence in regard to the eligibility criteria and guidelines. (17th March, 2009)
Crs Magee/Hyams
That a report be prepared on the feasibility of relocating the two tennis courts on Mackie Reserve in East Bentleigh to 31 Orange Street in East Bentleigh. (1st September, 2009)
Crs Penhalluriack/Esakoff
That a report be prepared into the tree clearance requirements under the Electricity Safety (Electric Line Clearance) Regulations 2010; documenting the typical effect on trees in Glen Eira if the regulations are enforced; documenting the estimated cost of implementing the tree clearance requirements; documenting the number of trees likely to be removed as a result of the requirements; and providing guidance as to whether Council could seek an exemption from applying the regulations. (3rd
November, 2010)
Cr Tang/Esakoff
(i) That Council prepare a report detailing the costs and feasibility of reinstalling the free mulch service previously provided at the former Council depot, then Caulfield Park and then most recently at Glen Huntly Reserve Car Park at another site in Glen Eira. (ii) The report should consider the adoption of all recommendations the Environmental Health Assessment completed in February 2011. (17th May, 2011)
October 26, 2011 at 1:40 PM
Say one thing but do another is becoming the real motto of Glen Eira. Forget the junk that’s on the front page of every agenda – it’s worthless.
October 26, 2011 at 2:20 PM
This post is the perfect example of why Notices of Motion are essential in this council. Requests for reports can be ignored and delayed. A well worded motion that enforces some action means that Newton would have greater difficulty in ignoring resolutions that specifically demanded that he does something. Mind you, even this wouldn’t guarantee that the thing is done judging by the way this council works.
October 26, 2011 at 2:26 PM
Many of those motions moved by Staikos would have been followed by press release to the Leader in an attempt to get somehing in the paper. Notwithstanding the reports should have been produced. Noticed him enjoying himself at the Caulfield Cup.
Keep up your excellent work.
October 26, 2011 at 3:28 PM
The number of reports not tabled is a worry. I’d suggest that many of these are political ones that have been deliberately scuttled. The Glen Huntly one stands out as do the village communities. They both threaten the agendas of this council in terms of better community representation as well as the conundrum of what should happen to the Glen Huntly area which the government wanted as a Major Activity Centre and Newton didn’t. I recall that council even handed back a $45,000 government grant that was given for structure planning here, or something similar.
Judging by some of the other untabled reports it all boils down to what Newton decides should go ahead and what shouldn’t and this is in spite of what councillors voted for. More unbelievable is the last entry on the mulch facility and that council is still waiting for a simple report that has already taken 5 months and still no show. I would have thought that whoever would be writing this report should know, or have at his fingertips, the physical locations of every available spot. Nothing should take five months to respond to a resolution. It’s not been tabled I think because Newton doesn’t want it tabled for whatever reason.
October 26, 2011 at 7:18 PM
Council resolutions are legal decisions which a ceo and his employees are bound to deploy. That this doesn’t appear to have happened is not just poor management. It equates in my mind to deliberate obstructionism. A recent post here cited some examples from the Whelan Report where previous councillors had accused Newton of this very thing. I also hold councillors responsible for this as one of the previous commentators has noted. I would presume that when a report is asked for, and a resolution is passed, that this denotes that it is an issue which is of concern to residents and the majority of councillors. There needs to be follow up and questions asked when a report fails to materialise. Delays and non appearance of reports must never be accepted as good management or good governance.
October 26, 2011 at 4:40 PM
Solution is dead easy – sack him!
October 26, 2011 at 5:39 PM
On an entirely different issue we wish to advise readers that the submissions to the Ministerial Planning Scheme Review are now online. There are over 500 submissions – from councils, community groups, individuals, and some marked as “anonymous”. You’ll find them at the following link – http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/planning/panelsandcommittees/current/vpsmac/vpsmacsubmissions1-200
After we’ve fully digested some of these, we will report back.
October 26, 2011 at 9:38 PM
The only reason that anyone consults is just in case someone comes up with an idea that they have not entertained. More crudely known as covering ones arse. I wouldn’t hold my breath that the new laws will include much of what the public has offered up.
October 26, 2011 at 10:50 PM
There’s no way to reconcile the fiction of Newton’s words with what actually occurs as shown by this analysis. There are other reports still waiting to be tabled including the one where councillors asked for a comparison of prices for gesac compared to msac. What’s happened to that one basketballers in particular should be asking.
October 27, 2011 at 9:36 AM
There is going to be NO Notice of Motion for Glen Eira so long as the 4 (MODERATORS: word deleted) councilors are there, they get want they want off the CEO, whilst neutering the other councillors.
October 27, 2011 at 8:22 PM
Since when has the word (MODERATORS: word deleted) been a a word worthy of censoring, I think we have a moderator with (MODERATORS: word deleted) sympathies, unwilling to tackle the heart of the problems.
MODERATORS’ RESPONSE
Dear Anon,
when we set up this blog our platform was clearly enunciated. We stated that we would moderate comments that we felt were defamatory or approached racial vilification. Our intention has always been to focus exclusively on the issues, regardless of who is involved, their ethnic grouping, race, or religion, or political beliefs. We still hold to these principles.
As to our own specific beliefs, values, or associations, of course we are not totally free of inbuilt (and often unconscious) prejudices. However, we do endeavour to ensure that such beliefs/values, etc. do not interfere with our analysis of issues and topics. You are free to hold whatever opinion YOU like and if you disagree with anything we’ve written, then please let us know. We will not however allow this blog to stray from our stated objectives and post comments that go against the grain of these precepts.
October 28, 2011 at 4:52 AM
Yes your role would be equal to that of an editor and you could in some situations be liable.
However, I too am becoming very frustrated with these undemocratic wasteful practices which are pouring out of GE.
Have we forgotten Voltaire’s wise words I disagree with whsat you have to say but I woill defend to my very death your right to say it?
Unfortunately, council meetings sound like verbal torture chambers and unanswered publiuc questrions and I can see similarities of the book “Animal Farm” by George Orwell.
Another similarity of the vatrious authoritarian govts. is the fact that the wonderful paper the Glen Eira News is only available on the library shelf for six months. Bad luck for historians wishing to brush up on a few council decisions.
October 28, 2011 at 9:24 AM
For a start, there is only one race, this would be the human race. Surly the elephant in the room is people running as independents, weather unconscious or not, do not represent the whole community. If this type of behaviour continues Glen Eira will end up a train wreck.