Candidates are lining up for the annual Mayoral Stoush. In the blue corner we have Hyams, whilst in the red corner there are two likely candidates – Pilling and Magee. It’s the traditional end of year derby that takes place behind the closed doors of assembly meetings and, you can bet your bottom dollar, countless private phone calls, secret meetings and emails, away from the prying eyes of the public and Newton. Favours are called in, promises made, hand on heart commitments to the ‘public good’, favourable time off from work, agreeable wives and husbands. The prize isn’t half bad either – just under $90,000 per annum; fame and glory; your mug shot on the hallowed walls and of course the opportunity to ram your (and Newton’s) agenda through with support from your allies. Sitting up on high you can squash debate so easily; you can rule anybody at any time out of order; you can prevent residents from addressing council; you can dismiss public questions as harassment; you can speak to the press and promulgate more spin; you can have your picture in the Glen Eira news innumerable times; you can, in short, rule the roost.
Or you have the real opportunity to return Glen Eira to what it should be – a place of respect for individuals, especially the public, and to oversee the change in corporate culture. We do not hold out much hope for this option if the blue corner maintains its current position.
Gazing into our crystal ball, the numbers are probably evenly split. We doubt that Pilling will stand if Magee does, and vice versa – this would only dilute their already limited power base. Lobo is the lynch pin. His vote is vital in breaking the Mexican stand off. Will he again stand with the gang and vote for Hyams? Will he resort to his former self and break with his new found friends? We do feel sincere sympathy for him – the pressure must be enormous. In a very real sense the future of good governance rests with him.
November 28, 2011 at 11:17 AM
If Hyams gets to be mayor then let’s all move to the country. Lobo, get your act together and use your brain. Supporting the gang wasn’t why you stood for election and why people voted for you.
November 28, 2011 at 12:16 PM
I was at a citizenship ceremony last week at Caulfield town hall. The mayor looked very regal. Talked about the million countries her ancestry was from. Good for getting lots of votes. Hyams and Lipshutz were there looking very smug. Lobo looked like he didn’t belong. Magee looked like he was actually one of us. Funny Newton was the MC. He talked about how the council would help us with all of our problems (Probably not everyones experience). I got the feeling that he was the council from the way he spoke!
November 28, 2011 at 12:49 PM
Just read your article and had a hearty laugh, pretty well sums it all up. When I was a councillor the mayoral elections were, I suspect, done even before Councillors were sworn in for their term of office! David Feldman (yes remember him), followed by Margaret then Steven Tang. My guess for this election – Jamie Hyams.
Rob Spaulding
November 28, 2011 at 1:13 PM
Thanks for confirming what everybody already knows Rob. Yup, Glen Eira is a great advertisement for above board practices.
November 28, 2011 at 2:50 PM
Politics is very much a dirty business. It’s incredibly sad that in Glen Eira mayors are not chosen because of their suitability for the job, the skills they bring to the post, nor their commitment to be fair, equitable, and just. The decisions are not based on who is the most qualified or gifted candidate for the job. We’ve seen time after time that the Mayor is simply that individual who has agreed to represent the interests of the most powerful voting bloc on council. Even more sad is that for the past 6 years it has resided with the gang. There’s been Tang (twice), Esakoff (3 times) and now probably Hyams. Having served as Deputy Mayor he can announce with a clear conscience that he has had some experience. Lipshutz wouldn’t want the job given his other commitments and I honestly can’t see him in the role of the cheery leader cutting ribbons and smashing bottles of champagne over new pavilions. He will sit back and conduct the necessary intrigue from the safety of the sidelines.
Will Hyams make a good Mayor? I doubt it. As the most “political” animal on council Hyams will continue equivocating, never committing himself publically to anything, yet resort to legalese in order to gag any criticisms. Unlike Tang he will probably not espouse his views on every single item ad nauseum, although he will take the opportunity to take a swipe at the perceived rat bag elements in the community. He will carefully manoeuvre discussions to favour the gang, but I guess it will be refreshing not to have motion after motion put on the table by the duo of Lipshutz/Hyams. With some luck, council meetings may cease to be the Lipshutz/Hyams show.
None of this augurs well for the rest of the councillors, nor for the community. It does promise much to Newton and Burke. Hyams, like his predecessors will pretend to exhibit some autonomy, but in the end he will roll over and have his stomach scratched like all good little lap dogs. His role on council has already suggested this. A strong supporter of the “no surprises” policy, of the pedantic and churlish inclusion of the “councillors must read all material” in the Code of Conduct, and in voting against so many sensible and common place ideals (Notice of Motion, Petition tabling, c60, centre of the racecourse; car park extension to gesac and hundreds more) residents should expect more of the same. This arch conservative simply does not appear to favour anything which will breathe some real transparency and open government into the cloistered walls of the Newton Empire. Hyams had his chance with the ceo appointment process. I’ve no doubt that he would have voted to reappoint. His position, his philosophy, and his subsequent shortcomings are clear. This is not the man for the Mayoral job in my view.
November 28, 2011 at 7:29 PM
Anonymous, I have to agree with the views you’ve presented. I don’t remember one single instance that this blog site has reported on where the voting of Hyams could be called innovative or progressive. His record on opposing attempts to liberalise this council speaks for itself as does his generally unremitting support for Lipshutz and in particular Esakoff. He is the first to jump to her aid in council meetings it seems and the first to defend her gallantly in the press. This may be a fine example of chivalry, but it’s not what I want in a Mayor. I would want the future Mayor to recognise the imperatives of greater community input into all facets of engagement and decision making as well as the need to relax the draconian meeting procedures which currently gag both councillors and the community. Hyams has revealed his strong opposition to both these imperatives. His election as Mayor would only reinforce such a culture and mentality and do irreparable damage to those councillors committed to seeking progress and change. Whether we can include both Magee and Pilling in this latter category I’m still not too sure. Time will tell however and they at least deserve an opportunity to prove their mettle. Hyams has had plenty of opportunity and has come up short on each occasion.
November 28, 2011 at 3:55 PM
(represent the interests of the most powerful voting bloc on council) – Common denominator please?
November 28, 2011 at 4:10 PM
Likewise Magee and Pilling are not Mayor material. Magee only talks about Tucker ward and is least bothered about other wards. Magee likes limelight and only pushes items where he will get fame such as getting the local press to talk about him and is full of empty promises. Hyams has lost his chance of being a Mayor last year when he supported Esakoff to be Mayor three times in a row. The best person for Mayor is Penhullariack and Lipshutz who speak thieir mind. It would give Penhullariack a chance to augment the difference he has with Newton. Magee and Pilling will just be yes men.
November 28, 2011 at 4:51 PM
You have got to be kidding – Lipshutz as mayor! He might see himself as the savior of the pool, the expert on the audit commitee, the legal juggernaut on the local laws committee, but gee whizz as mayor!!! There’s just got to be a limit to this god’s abilities doesn’t there?
November 28, 2011 at 6:24 PM
“Magee and Pilling yes men” You don’t go to Council meetings do you?
November 28, 2011 at 5:14 PM
Many of those mentioned above have contributed to one of the most undemocratic ruling class I believe I have ever witnessed.
The mayor, has stiffled any independent thought form many other councillors (Moderators: rest of sentence deleted) and if she did not tell opposition council views to “shut -up” or be quiet through the mechanism of “out of order” then one of the other gang did.
She seems to always be able to make her views made quite clear, and allows her gang members to always talk without interruption and usually for as long as they like. Other councillors have responded by not expressing any views so we now have only about four minds making contributions, three of whom are lawyers with no practical hands on construction experience, while the remainder sit fearful of being “snipped” at from all directions!!!!
nOW, THE MAYOR , WHEN SPEAKING AT THE CITIZENSHIP CEREMONY, SANG OUT THE BENEFITS OF OUR DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY…. Just metres from one of the most undemocratic council chambers I have ever experienced.
Mayor please chant the words of Voltaire
‘I DISAGREE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY, BUT I WILL DEFEND TO MY VERY DEATH YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT”. AND PUT THESE WORDS INTO PRACTICE FOR YOUR LAST MEETING FOR 2011, SO AS YOU MAY GIVE THE NEXT MAYOR GOOD EXAMPLE AND HE/SHE WILL FORGET YOUR BULLY LIKE PRACTICES.
November 28, 2011 at 8:51 PM
When I stated that “Magee and Pilling will be yes men” what was meant was they will do whatever Newton and Burke tells them to do; they lack the necessary qualifications and experience to use their own mind. Magee has the habit of jumping ships.
November 28, 2011 at 9:36 PM
One thing we can be sure of is that whoever becomes the next Mayor of Glen Eira, merit will have very little to do with it.
You have to go back a long way to find a Mayor that was appointed on merit – certainly to before the Whelan Report. Maybe to Bob Bury and Veronika Martens who at least had some integrity and concern for residents interests.
Since then, the mayoralty has gone to some of the least capable councillors – and at times has simply been a display of the bloody-mindedness and arrogance of the ruling clique. Margaret Esakoff, after being part of the former disgraced council was appointed as a snub to the State Government and showed that nothing had really changed.
Helen Whiteside, perhaps the least deserving Mayor we have had, just scraped into council on the preferences of Lipshutz and Penhalluriack (hard to believe they were once allies) and was elected simply to show that the ruling clique had the power to do whatever they liked.
And things haven’t improved since then. In fact, they have got worse. Upon Esakoff’s election, while most councillors were offering they congratulations, two councillors – Staikos and Robilliard – spoke out publicly in opposition. Even Frank hasn’t had the guts to do that.
Some are saying that Jamie will be the next Mayor. I am personally surprised that he hasn’t already been Mayor – everyone knows how much he wants it. I’m sure he could have taken it at any time. There are really only two plausible reasons – either that he doesn’t have the time or that he is waiting until the year of the election so that he can improve his chances of re-election through the publicity he will attract as Mayor.
As for the likes of Pilling, Magee & Lobo – if one of them gets the deputy position, it will most likely be because they supported the “gang” in re-apponting Andrew Newton. Favours gained for favours given.
November 28, 2011 at 10:01 PM
Lobo might get it as payback for being a good boy. He was bustin to be mayor last time. Magee and Pilling might stand a chance because there’s nobody else. Tang has already had it, so has Esakoff. It would look pretty shonky if they got it again. Maybe Lipshutz? What a duo that would be – Lipshutz and Hyams – the mind boggles.
November 28, 2011 at 9:39 PM
The MAV website has got a publication which outlines the expected qualities of a Mayor.
“There are six essential elements to consider:
• Leader of the Council
• Enhancer of Good Governance
• Builder of External and Media Relations
• Promoter of Civic and Institutional Pride
• Supporter and Engager with the Community
• Facilitator of the Process of Governing”
I’m afraid that of the 6 qualities listed above Mayor Esakoff in my estimation would only achieve a bare pass on two of the above. I don’t expect Hyams to do any better, especially on supporting the community.
November 28, 2011 at 9:58 PM
If the vote is unanimous then we’d all better start storming the place. No way should Magee, Forge, Penhalluriack and Pilling vote for Hyams. If they do then they’re no better than the gang. This total rubbish of presenting a united front is an insult to every single person. Council is divided and any vote that tries to give a lie to this is plain disgusting. This is the test for Magee and his mates – let’s see them put their vote where it counts – out in public. For once let’s hear the godamn truth and not the prearranged lies that this council runs on.
November 29, 2011 at 7:58 AM
If Magee became mayor of Glen Eira we are in real trouble. Some of what comes out of his mouth is either fanciful or disingenious. In amongst all the various codes to which Councillors are supposed to apply one must call for them to be fair dinkum. Jim is not always fair dinkum. Having a mayor with a loose mouth will ruin the council. In fact it will ensure that most of those seeking re-election next year will fail. Jim would have trouble chairing a meeting with the some very aggrevated lawyers around the table. Poor bastard would choose to stay home as he does with most of the civic functions. I imagine Jim has promised Frank that he will rip down the tin fence around the race track with his bare hands. “Tell em anything for the vote.” Anyone that supports Magee obviously has not been atending Council meetings.
November 29, 2011 at 10:36 AM
Come on Cr Hyams, let’s be fair dinkum. what have you ever done for Glen Eira. Pilling or Magee, just not you.
November 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM
I am not Cr, Hyams. And I am not saying he should be mayor. I am simply making some points about Cr. Magee. He is not reliable and you will see what damage he would cause as mayor. He would not have the capacity to chair a meeting as he has little credibility with the other 8 councillors.
November 29, 2011 at 11:55 AM
If Magee has no credibility then you will be Mayor Cr Hyams. I think it will be Pilling.
November 29, 2011 at 2:56 PM
If he becomes mayor he will quickly learn that he will not be able to practise as a Green. This ain’t Richmond and he still only gets one vote.
He may disappoint a few local Greens not being able to push the Greens left wing band wagon. He calls it progressive. Lefties are not so popular around here. 88% of people do not approve of them.
November 29, 2011 at 3:32 PM
As others have pointed out Lobo may be the one to decide who is mayor.
We need to look at lobo and what’s in it for him if he votes for Hyams, Magee or Pilling.
November 29, 2011 at 3:42 PM
#
Mayor
Term
1
Alan Grossbard JP
1997 – 1998
2
Barry Neve JP
1998 – 1999
3
Norman Kennedy
1999 – 2000
4
Veronika Martens
2000 – 2001
5
Noel Erlich
2001 – 2002
6
Peter Goudge JP
2002 – 2003
7
Dorothy Marwick
2003 – 2004
8
Bob Bury
2004
9
Margaret Esakoff
2004 – 2005
10
David Feldman
2005 – 2006
11
Margaret Esakoff
2006 – 2007
12
Steven Tang
2007 – 2008
13
Helen Whiteside
2009 –
[edit] Deputy Mayors (2006 to present)
#
Deputy Mayor
Term
1
David Feldman
2006 – 2007
2
Margaret Esakoff
2007 – 2008
3
Steven Tang
2009
November 29, 2011 at 4:05 PM
BEING ABLE TO CHAIR A MEETING OTHER THAN DRIVING A STEAMROLLER IS ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IN THIS PRETENCE AT DEMOCRACY.
November 29, 2011 at 6:22 PM
I like D.Evans’ approach of identifying desirable qualities of a Mayor and assessing candidates against them. My own view is that Jamie invalidated himself through poor judgment by supporting, seconding, fueling and encouraging the extraordinary attack on Frank; including seeking to have the minutes mislead the public. He does however have a chance to redeem himself by correcting the public record at the next Council meeting. I don’t like Neil’s tendency to vote for large multiunit developments without associated infrastructure or consideration of long-term social needs but that doesn’t necessarily make him a bad candidate for Mayor. It just means we need elections more frequently than every 4 years.
November 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM
Someone raised the excellent question of what each councillor has done for the community during the term of their office. I honestly can’t think of one thing that any of them have achieved or even supervised in a competent manner. Everything has come from an equally incompetent and manipulative administration. The list of non achievement is endless – gesac the building and the basketball; tree protection policy and environment; community consultation policy that is a disgrace; planning scheme review that is only tinkering with the edges; dog review that went nowhere. What these councillors have permitted is bullying, gagging, evasiveness and secrecy. None of them are capable of being mayor and none of them deserve being mayor. I wouldn’t pay them $90,000 I wouldn’t pay them 9 cents!
December 14, 2011 at 8:39 PM
(represent the interests of the most powerful voting bloc on council)…….
hmmm.. that would be “democracy”.
You may not side with those individuals in the bloc – but guess whay – in a democracy – majority rules.
If it was Magee, Pilling, Forge and Lobo running the bloc – would you have a different position??
Your argument is flawed.
However – feel free to simply say you oppose Lipshutz and Hyams – you’re entitled to that view.