Below is the amended version of the post from Cr. Pilling’s blog on the ‘discussions’ re the GESAC basketball allocations. The original post has been altered (without identifying the changes) and we now have this new version of history and thinking:

“I will post details of the motion passed and comments re item 12.8 GESAC Multi-Use Courts that involves the allocation of basketball as soon as publically available which normally takes several days.

Council considered the issue over the the past two nights after reaching the 11pm time limit at the Tuesday night meeting.

The main problem in my view has been the design and oblectives of the original process. I feel the emphasis was too much on fees and ‘future marketing plans’.

I have no critisism of the way officers administered the expression of interest process but question the criteria and objectives that have led everyone to the present situation.

Like the increased childcare fee issue I feel Council has taken a too narrow economic rationalist approach at the expense of genuine community need. This really goes to the heart of the matter. There is certainly a need to review the whole process for future basketball allocations at GESAC in the new year.

please note- the posting date can be a day behind”.

COMMENT

  • Is this a mea culpa to placate Newton and Burke? – ie. no criticism of officers?
  • Questioning ‘criteria and objectives’ is surely questioning the planning/strategic direction of the whole project and who set these criteria and objectives? If officers then the blame must be laid at their feet. If councillors, then they are all implicated in the failure to meet community needs. More relevant, is the issue of councillor involvement in the creation of these ‘criteria and objectives’. Did councillors know what was happening? If they didn’t were they derelict in their duty?
  • Is it ‘intellectually dishonest’ for Pilling to amend his original blog posting without indicating that this is now a new, updated version?
  • And what does the last sentence really mean – that there still is no decision and that this will linger on until ‘sometime in the new year’?