The MBA Executive have put out the following statement:
Dear Members,
GESAC Update from Council Meeting 14-Dec-2011
We are very keen for the MBA to have a presence in GESAC as we see ourselves as clearly the most logical occupant. Consequently we will work with Council and the Warriors to see whether there is a way in which the proposal as outlined below can be made to work.
However, what the motion does not contemplate is the fact that the court space we currently occupy is not ours to allocate to others as we see fit. As such we will need to work with our relevant schools to determine whether they would be agreeable to such an arrangement. This process has already commenced. It is important to stress this point as some recent media reports suggest that we have already agreed to the proposal as outlined in the motion, we have only made such commitments subject to agreement from our existing landlords.
On December 14, 2011 a motion was put before Glen Eira City Council by Councillors Hyams and Lipshitz, the motion read as follows:
That Council
- Note that:
- As the result of a fair and proper Expression of Interest (EoI) process, the use of the GESAC indoor courts for basketball was allocated to the Warriors;
- In the interests of maximising the use of the GESAC indoor courts by the community, Council’s preferred position is that the basketball allocation be shared between the Warriors and the McKinnon Basketball Association (MBA); and
- Notwithstanding the allocation referred to in (a), the Warriors have indicated a willingness to share that allocation with the MBA.
- Allocate the use of the GESAC indoor courts to the Warriors on Fridays from 6pm to 11pm and Sundays from 9am to 11pm.
- Allocate the use of the GESAC indoor courts to the MBA on Saturdays from 8am to 11pm subject to the MBA agreeing by January 15 2012 to provide two alternative basketball courts to the Warriors from 8am to 7pm on Saturdays to the reasonable satisfaction of the Warriors, or, if such agreement is not reached, or observed, allocate the GESAC indoor courts to the Warriors on Saturdays from 8am to 7pm.
- In all other respects, apply the terms and conditions of the allocation referred to in 1(a) to the use of the courts by the Warriors and, if applicable, to the MBA.
- Authorise officers to give effect to this resolution.
- Incorporate this resolution and this report in the public Minutes of this Meeting apart from Council’s legal advice at section 3.4 of this report and in the attachments.
DIVISION Cr Magee called for a Division on voting of the SUBSTANTIVE MOTION FOR: Cr Tang, Cr Hyams, Cr Lipshutz, Cr Forge AGAINST: Cr Magee, Cr Penhalluriack, Cr Pilling, Cr Esakoff
The SUBSTANTIVE MOTION was put and CARRIED on the casting Vote of the Chairperson (Mayor Cr. Hyams)
Finally, it is worth noting that this allocation is for 12 months and that it is our understanding that should the Warriors be unable to fully utilize the space they have committed to for their own use, any surplus capacity will be reallocated by Council and must first be offered to McKinnon.
Kind regards
MBA Executive Committee
Source: http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?client=1-4059-0-0-0
February 1, 2012 at 11:04 PM
I’m not sure what the implications of the last paragraph mean. If the Warriors can’t find enough teams and can’t fill the stadium as per their agreement will they be let off scot free? The whole argument has been about the legalities of contracts or expressions of interest. If the Warriors can’t come up with the numbers then have they voided the contract? I also seem to remember something in the actual resolution about the payment of $10,000 per court that’s been left out of the above statement. The whole thing is a total botch up, but since gesac won’t be open yet for months and months I guess the whole issue is academic.
February 4, 2012 at 9:35 AM
With no visual marketing since late last year, the Warriors will struggle to fill ALL the courtspace. Few players, Few teams, No Competition, No Referees!
As they have promised so much who will be held accountable if they cannot deliver? Council have a real challenge to convince the residents and ratepayers of Glen Eira that their EOI allocation was the right one!
February 2, 2012 at 11:54 AM
Seems to me that all parties will be satisfied by Council’s initiative except those who live to the West of our City, and will have paid the most for this badly sited facility. McKinnon,Oakleigh,what about Elsternwick.
February 6, 2012 at 3:32 PM
Why is it that every MBA executive announcement posted on their website is placed on this website, yet at the same time nothing has ever been posted from the Warriors executive or club in the same manner.
Maybe a little balance could be worthy of effort.
As for some of the normal trivial posts above why would the Warriors do any marketing or announcements until it knows what the final details of this mess is?
As for the $10,000.00 bond just another little Gem from certain councillors to price the winning group out of the process. Does any other user group have to pay such a ludricous amount for a bond?
I would have thought any attempt to inflict such a bond on one user group and not others would be considered extreme discriminatory and not something any sensible council would look to impose on any community group.
February 6, 2012 at 4:11 PM
Dear Anonymous,
we would be pleased to post anything the Warriors Exec put out into the public domain, or email to us. Unfortunately the Warriors Newsletter does not appear to contain any information on the allocations issue and the only mentions of GESAC that we could find (going back months and months) are about the actual proposed basketball competitions/teams. In contrast the MBA does have updates on the GESAC situation – that’s why the releases appear on our blog.
If you wish to “rectify” then situation then please forward us anything you like and it will be published!