Errors stall Glen Eira pool opening

BY BEAU DONELLY
02 Apr, 2012 01:48 PM
CONSTRUCTION of the $41 million Glen Eira Sports and Aquatic Centre is expected to be completed later this month – four months behind schedule.Head of the pools steering committee, Cr Michael Lipshutz, said builders’ mistakes and “cost-cutting” measures by developer Hansen Yuncken were to blame for the delay.“Part of the delay has resulted from our two  project managers catching the builders cutting corners and making mistakes, some of which are serious,” he said. “We’ve made them fix it because we want the highest quality finish and want the centre to last at least 40 years.”Cr Lipshutz said that while some of the mistakes posed a danger to public health and safety, most were cosmetic.

But while the council was pressing to have the centre open by the end of April, Cr Lipshutz said progress was ‘‘in the hands of the builder’’.

Hansen Yuncken will be forced to pay more than $1 million in liquidated damages for the project running late. To date, the council has paid Hansen Yuncken $36.89 million.

According to the council’s GESAC eNewsletter, the gym, indoor stadium, change rooms, child-care centre, reception and car parks have been completed.

Builders are still working on the outdoor concourse and final rectification works around the site.

Glen Eira Council spokesman Paul Burke said staff had started to install gym equipment.

“Once that is done and all construction work has been completed, the community will be advised of the precise opening date for GESAC,” he said.

Hansen Yuncken’s Victorian manager, Richard Hansen, said it was not appropriate to comment.

COMMENT
  • Will Lipshutz’s comments get him into trouble? – ie. ‘cutting corners’
  • Does ‘not appropriate to comment’ mean that residents should start looking out for a long and protracted legal battle? Will we be told even if this does eventuate?
  • Tender for gym equipment went out (listed as higher purchase agreement with Westpac) in July 2011. It was still being discussed in camera at last council meeting. Thus, is there a problem Houston? If not, then why the need for another in camera ‘discussion’?