Why is it that every single major project in Glen Eira is always behind schedule and not just by a few months, but sometimes by years? Duncan McKinnon pavilion is just the latest in this history of delay, budget blowouts, and possibly another legal battle. To compound this dismal record there is always the accompanying silence and keeping residents in the dark as much as possible.
This year’s Annual Report proves our point. Buried on page 82 there is this one, solitary sentence: Construction has commenced but walls and roof are not yet complete. The builder is behind schedule due to rework on items which have not met quality standards
Quality standards? So a ten million dollar project that was initially earmarked for half that price is again the victim of poor workmanship? What should concern ratepayers is:
- Has Council called in the legal eagles again and how much is this costing?
- Has Council called in consultants to ‘correct’ the ‘errors’ and how much is this costing?
- Has Maxstra (the builder) in fact walked off the job since there is now no hoardings advertising their involvement?
- How much ‘remedial’ work has been undertaken and who is paying for this?
The most pertinent question however involves councillors and how well they have been keeping their eye on the ball. Pilling, in particular, promised much, but has delivered little. His blog on December 25th 2011 had this comment:
At the first Councillor assembly meeting in January I have requested a full update and explanation by our administration for the current situation. I acknowledge there were some delays caused by VicRoads in approving the new carpark entrances. However this should not have prevented the preparation and finalisation of the tender documents for construction being completed.
Then 16months later on April 8th 2013 we get this ‘promise’ –
Recently along with other Councillors I was provided with an on-site tour of the construction site of our current major capital project – the new pavillion at Duncan Mckinnon. This is a $9.5 million project that will deliver wonderful new modern facilities to the literally thousands of local children and families who play sport at our busiest recreational facility. There will also be a reconfiguration of the carpark to allow for safer traffic movements.
As one who competed on the track from the mid-seventies to now seeing family members participating in the netball competitions there, it is especially pleasing to see this progress.
The photos above show the construction is well advanced-with completion on track for the end of March next year and I will post regular updates
Needless to say, that is the last we have heard about Duncan McKinnon from this councillor, and in fact Council as a whole. Nothing has been mentioned in Council Meetings and the records of assembly generally are silent on the issue.
The Annual Report states that walls and roof should have been completed. Below we feature a photo we took over the weekend. The roof is nowhere to be seen and walls are barely up. In six months nothing has practically changed!
But that’s not the end of the story. Victory Park change rooms are also well behind schedule. The ‘excuse? – The scope of works was increased to deal with poor ground conditions, requiring the works to be tendered which has delayed the delivery of the project. Works are currently in progress.
Could so much bad luck really be hounding poor old Glen Eira Council? Or are these delays partly the response to a cash flow crisis?
PS: The tender for Victory Park closed on the 17th May 2013. That’s 5 months to add two change rooms and showers. Multi-storey buildings are completed in less time!

October 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM
also this has completely stuffed up all the clubs that use the facility. Athletics was fine with the facility the way it was just somewhere to store equipment + they could use the social rooms as much as they wanted too. After the ‘upgrade’ only get 2 free uses a year then have to pay for it. There is a much promised track upgrade also promised once the building has been completed. There have been lots of athletes getting injuries as a result of the poor track conditions. Schools have also no intent of returning to Duncan Mckinnon next year because of the mess. Athletics Victoria will also not be holding events there. Could be lots of legal action to and from the council
October 29, 2013 at 2:56 PM
http://www.projectlink.com.au/news/new-duncan-mackinnon-reserve-gets-500000-boost
Last URL is mindblowing. $500,000 from government that they’ve been sitting on since 2009!
October 30, 2013 at 3:03 PM
Dunno why you’re so shocked about a paltry $500,000 since 2009!!!.
Consider the Booran Road/Glen Huntly Road Reservoir deal. Land worth $10m, known they were going to get it (for nothing) since the late 1990’s, formally handed over in 2010, already had two community consultations and have no intention of doing anything for another 3 years. Located slap bang in the high density Glen Huntly activity centre.
October 30, 2013 at 8:22 PM
Lands pretty worthless. Too close to a toxic mulch facility.
October 31, 2013 at 6:33 AM
Probably why Council (a.k.a. CEO Newton) was making moves to sell the land for high density development (2008) before the land was officially handed over – unfortunately for Newton but luckily for Glen Eira the terms of the handover where changed from “freehold land” that of “management” only
October 31, 2013 at 8:13 AM
Mulch toxicity is not an issue. I have it on good authority that the reason the $160,000 3 sided mulch shed cost so much was because the concrete was specially treated with a chemical neutralizing agent.
October 29, 2013 at 3:24 PM
Forget the “quality standards” and go right back to the start which means the tendering process. There have been posts on this blog about tendering and how other councils publish full reports. Not Glen Eira. They don’t even publish what criteria and how many criteria are involved in a $10m deal. The tender that went to Maxstra only said “contractual”. Even when the number of criteria are published they are invariably 3. Not enough in mine view when millions are involved. And who are the faceless men who write up the tenders? That never gets published either.
I’m not surprised because this is the way Newton has set up his non accountable systems in absolutely everything that happens in council. The “reward” is another contract probably for 5 years.
October 29, 2013 at 6:59 PM
Pilling wants to be mayor so best to keep ya trap shut and be a good little boy and do as ya told.
October 30, 2013 at 3:39 PM
It can only be Pilling that would get the nod from Lipshutz. No one else would sell out to the gang. I can’t see Sounness, Delahunty or Magee doing a deal.
October 30, 2013 at 4:35 PM
I seriously doubt whether residents can place any faith in any of these councillors including Magee, Sounness, Delahunty, and the other laborite in Lobo. If the decision to reappoint Newton is unanimous then that’s more proof of how poorly represented residents are by the entire group of councillors and how little community input there is on any decision making by this council.
January 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM
MODERATORS: We have received this comment which we will with-hold for the time or until fully corroborated with evidence. The comment related to the works on the Duncan Mackinnon pavilion.
We ask that the author of the comment please contact us at gedebates@gmail.com
We also note that the Maxstra website (the contractor for the works) has now removed any mention of the Duncan Mackinnon project from its site! Readers should remember that at the last council meeting there was an in camera item on the “contract” for this project. Council would appear to be up to its neck in more legal battles that are being kept under wraps and secret.
January 20, 2014 at 3:37 PM
was anons comment that the council has got rid of the contractor and they have a few people into do a few jobs. A new builder will be sorted out in the future. This was an official communique to the clubs from the council.
In the meantime the clubs that use the facility are suffering badly with reduction in memberships and injuries due to the shocking conditions. All this for a pavillion that they did not want. Perfectly happy with the old facility where there was somewhere to sit and store equipment.