Like so many councils, Glen Eira has an Urban Forest Strategy. Yet we really know nothing about the progress of this strategy. We do have an ‘implementation strategy’ which is full of aspirational, motherhood statements, rather than clear and precise plans. As an example here is a screen dump from part of this strategy.

Please note that council’s annual report fails to reveal how many trees were removed. All we are told is the number of new plantings. To the best of our memory, we have yet to see any ‘audit’ of the strategy. If this has been done, then it should be in the public domain!

Nor does the Urban Forest Strategy outline how the disparity in terms of canopy cover between various areas are to be tackled. Yes, there are a few sentences which state the areas with lower tree canopy but nothing is proposed on which areas will become top priority, nor how. Since the adoption of the strategy, no further information has surfaced in regards to this important factor.

By way of contrast, we urge readers to compare Glen Eira with Bayside. In the latter’s current agenda we find lengthy documents for each of their precincts – shown below –

We’ve uploaded the Brighton East document merely as an example.

Yet the analysis, and draft actions, are specifically directed to the individual characteristics of this area – even street to street as shown by the included maps.

Finally it is worth reminding readers that Bayside has set a target of 30% tree canopy cover by 2040. Glen Eira has been forced to change its initial target and go up to 22% by 2040 – for a municipality that has close to the greatest loss of tree canopy in the state and definitely the least amount of public open space per capita. When will we see some real action, some real  planning, and some meaningful financial resourcing so that the tree canopy will indeed increase dramatically?