Just a very brief rundown on tonight’s marathon council meeting. A more comprehensive version will follow tomorrow.

  1. Packer Park will have a bowling and bocce green to replace the old bowling green. Petanque is out! Kindergartens are out! Green open space is out – although a couple of barbecues (that council can charge for bookings) will be put in. Great consultation over this – offer option 1 (sell the bowling green); when this is defeated, use answers to this as basis for another concept (bocce, bowls,pentanqe) and again when people give you their views, just state that kindergartens are inappropriate there. The question that has NEVER been asked of residents is ‘WHAT DO YOU WANT’?
  2. Lobo gagged AGAIN. Seems like Oscar Lobo attempted to reveal something about an email written to him by Lipshutz in response to the former’s email to Esakoff. Hyams piped up that private emails are private and since councillors have right of reply only when the PUBLIC may draw some inference from comments/press/statements, Lobo couldn’t raise the issue. We strongly suspect that it has something to do with his earlier call of ‘racism’ that he has attempted on several occasions to put before council.
  3. Lipshutz was at his absolute arrogant best in a 5 minute tirade against Nick Varvodic and his public questions relating to Lipshutz and the Frisbee Group. All the old cliches and shibboleths were trotted out on cue – Mr. Varvodic should read Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People; that Varvodic was guilty of narcism; that he was ignorant; that he was defamatory (ironic?) and that his questions were like asking someone if they had killed their wife!!!!! Gosh Cr. Lipshutz, we think that it’s about time you got some new lines. These are becoming a real drag – especially when you’ve used them time and time again (see council minutes relating to previous tirade against Mary Walsh).  Repetition is boring and displays a total lack of imagination!
  4. Penhalluriack, to his credit, objected to the tone of the answers.
  5. Arguably the most interesting decision of the night, was the unanimous passing of the Station St. planning application. Officers relied almost exclusively on the assumed acceptance of the c60 amendment in their argument. There’s no c60 as yet, but the application was passed!