We’ve received a Position Paper from Mr. Orek Tenen on the entire Phoenix Precinct and the Racecourse/C60 amendment. Mr. Tenen’s paper is quite lengthy, and there are many attachments. (+2). We’ve uploaded the full paper here, but present in abridged form his conclusions and recommendations below:
Suggestions
To change the unsatisfactory situation and to ensure that Phoenix Precinct satisfies and complies with the designated original Crown Land provisions and community wishes, the following points should be progressed:
- The whole Original Crown Land (page 86 of Murray & Well book on History of Caulfield Ref) should be strategically planned as one entity of State significance (202 ha) together with all stakeholders and residents;
- Glen Eira and Stonnington Councils to ask the State Government to establish a Priority Development Zone for this whole area;
- Current Caulfield Racecourse trustees to be replaced with those that can appropriately represent the Crown Grant terms and conditions i.e. three functions (Racecourse, Public Recreation & Public Park) plus Glen Eira Council as a Planning and Responsible Authority, and State Government as the owner of the Crown Land;
- Amendment C60 to be abandoned, but C60 area to be developed as a Technology Park and not a shopping centre;
- Training of horses to be removed from the Caulfield Racecourse public Recreation ground & public Park (CRRP);
- The present training track to be used by the public for close viewing of races as is done at Flemington racecourse. This will increase the attendance of the Caulfield racecourse racing as is the wish of the racing fraternity and MRC;
- Fencing around the Racecourse to be transformed to a modern type that allows visualisation of the CRRP ground and activities on it;
- Increase the Recreation & Public Park elements of CRRP to be fully within safe racing track as it is done in so many overseas and Australia’s premier racecourses;
- Improve access to the CRRP Recreation & Public Park elements of the racecourse;
- Caulfield Station to be developed as a major Transit Station, particularly for goods transport linking East and West of Victoria i.e. deep channel Westernport Bay and Avalon Airport;
- Remove level crossings as a priority in getting the goods transport on line(s) that link Westernport and Avalon Airport;
- To ensure proper implementation establish a Steering Committee and an Implementation Authority.
Key findings:
- The original 1858 Caulfield Heath land size earmarked for recreation reserve was 440 acres (137.6 ha). The Caulfield Racecourse is all that remains of that with 54 ha, of which only about 8 ha is supposedly reserved as a Public Recreation and Public Park. And even that is yet to become fully available to residents with an unknown timetable.
- Health & Environment issues should be the driver of the Build Environment if Quality of Life is to be improved;
- Councils are to properly plan for the future together with their community and not rely only on legislation and bureaucratic processes. This is important for the Victorian Government as well if it is to achieve its objectives for the State;
- Phoenix Precinct and Caulfield Racecourse to become a State significant Project, whose economic value exceeds $10 billion. Glen Eira Council has not got the capacity or staff to handle such a big Project.
- Caulfield Station in a middle rank LGA is a pre-eminent junction station and should be developed as a Transit Station for goods transport to connect East with West Victoria, specifically Westernport deep channel facility with Avalon Airport.
- Key to the success of Caulfield Junction is a program of removing Level Crossings between Westernport and Avalon Airport to ensure cost benefit of goods transport, both on rails and roads.
Orek Tenen,
Secretary
Sustainable Villages & Suburbs Inc
January 29, 2011 at 7:12 AM
gee, this is not just a tragedy, but a travesty of justice from beginning of caulfield racecourse and reserve park over 150 years ago. and to think that we have three lawyers on the council! obviously they are small time lawyers pre-occupied with making money and nothing else. they are not worthy of being councillors serving glen eira community. and what the hell is steven tang and jim magee doing as trustees of caulfield racecourse and reserve park? i do not think they undestand the meaning of being a trustee on behalf of glen eira community. chuck them out.
January 29, 2011 at 1:01 PM
Every one of the points makes common sense and hard to dispute – yet successive local and state governments have done nothing to address these issues. Unfortunately the tenticles of the MRC are long and they always get their own way. The gang of four have made their decision to proceed with the C60 farce and couldn’t give a hoot about residents. But beware – as we have all seen in Tunisia and Egypt, people power will ultimately win through and the consequences can be dramatic.
January 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM
Everyone knows that the Author has/had a huge Conflict of Interest when anything relates to Glenhuntly Shopping Centre.Let him explain why he wants to ruin locl employment in the Municipality and obliterate the enjoyment we gain from the use of our Racecource.In my opinion the MRC land to the North should be compulsory aquired by the Federal Government for the expansion of Monash University.
January 30, 2011 at 1:29 PM
Anonymous, it would be really nice if your allegations had some grounding in fact. They don’t!!! If you’re the same ‘anonymous’ who keeps writing about employment then how about some figures to back it up? According to the leader nearly three years ago, there were only 20 trainers based at Caulfield. Even if each employed 6 staff (and assuming that these are all locals) then that would make a grand total of only 120 people. The Racecourse is there to serve the interests and recreation needs of 130,000 people – who by the way are all locals!
You are obviously pretty ignorant about the current state of Monash as well. Yes, let’s expand, let’s conquer the world and have half of caulfield as a university. Hang on – there simply aren’t enough students. International student figures have plumetted; expenditure on overseas campuses a small disaster, and yet you want Monash to continue to spend, spend, spend. I hope they’ve got more brains than you have in writing your comments.
Then there’s your little dig at Tenen. As far as I’m concerned he makes terrific sense and should be listened to. As for ‘conflict of interest’ – again, how about backing up your nonsense with facts? There were plenty of allegations of conflict of interest amongst councillors past and present. Currently Lipshutz, in the past Erlich and business involving his wife. It’s dead easy to forgo argument and resort to personal attacks. Dead easy but with little validity or credibility.
January 31, 2011 at 8:41 AM
So “the MRC land to the North should be compulsory aquired by the Federal Government”? Why? To satisfy greed of MRC and whoever owns land out there? The worst affected areas by MRC development are Caulfield North and Carnegie. I suspect you own land there and you want to maximise your investment.
January 30, 2011 at 6:54 PM
I am perplexed not just curious. Can anyone explain in plain common sense language, what constitutes conflict of interest?
I reckon that all those that knew about MRC expansion program and bought some land North of the Racecourse would make quite a quid on reselling such land!
I can only guess, but Trustees would know, Councillors would know, and the Administration. I’d look at those people rather than ordinary resident or trader.