Neil Pilling has highlighted another important item on Tuesday night’s agenda (9.3) – the call for Expressions of Interest to convert the conservatory at Caulfield Park into an 80 seat café/restaurant. We applaud Cr. Pilling for his stance that instead of wasting more money on such EOI processes, the funds would be better spent on actually fixing and conserving the building!

The current state of the conservatory requires full investigation and answers to these questions:

  • Why has this important historical building been allowed to deteriorate to the extent that it has? Why have priorities been  given to ‘concrete plinthing’ ahead of preservation?
  • How many more times will the old and spurious argument that something will cost too much to renovate/develop/preserve, so let’s get rid of it, be used to justify a pre-planned agenda – ie. swimming pools, maternal centres, libraries, etc. etc.?
  • Why is ‘consultation’ following the call for ‘expressions of interest’ and not the other way around? Previous ‘consultation’ (ie survey) is now obsolete, skewed, and irrelevant – especially since no real proposal was featured in this ‘survey’.
  • How does this support the already existing businesses in the area?
  • What environmental and social impact will this have on the park and its surrounds?
  • How much open space will be lost?
  • Can the area accommodate more parking?
  • What happens if there are no bona fide EOIs? Will council allow this site to simply perish?