The alleged comments by Hyams in this article raise major issues.
- Why should residents believe him or his script writers?
- Why is this council doing absolutely nothing in contrast to other councils, much less informing the public in a clear, direct and honest manner about its intentions and the real ramifications of what will happen from July 1st and in the coming year?
- Is this the most potent example of not merely fiddling whilst Rome is burning, but the clear intention of doing absolutely nothing to review, change or modify a strategic planning approach that is clearly incapable of protecting residents?
- Could anything be clearer than the refusal to change a damn thing, since according to Hyams, ‘council was happy’ with the residential zones?
Below we feature some extracts from the agenda items for the next Kingston Council Ordinary Meeting. Not only is there a lengthy officer report on the implications of the commercial zone changes from July 1st, but actions to try and ameliorate the potential damage (uploaded here). In Glen Eira all we get is silence, inaction, and misinformation!
With a Planning Permit previously prohibited locations can be used to create multiple Supermarket(s), shop(s) or Department Store(s).
The zoning translation, if not carefully managed at residential abuttals, also has the potential to create adverse amenity impacts with the ability of incompatible land uses to establish without a planning permit.
A Supermarket under 1800m2 or shop under 500m2 associated with or adjoining a Supermarket can be constructed without a Planning Permit. The definition of Shop also includes Bottle Shop. This would mean that beyond issues of policy matters such as loading times, hours of operation or other management issues associated with facilities that may impact on amenity of adjacent residential areas would not be able to be considered.
Businesses of all sizes have made investment decision in the City of Kingston based on the Local Planning Policy Frameowrk and the application of zones. These decisions for numerous business owners have the potential to be immediately and directly undermined through the application of the Commercial 2 Zone in location where certain activities where(sic) previously prohibited.
…it has also been necessary to consider that if the Commercial 2 zone were applied what levels of amenity protection would be provided for immediately adjacent or nearby residential areas when compared with the status quo.
The work of successive council’s (sic) in developing Structure Plans, Local Planning Policies, facilitating retail investment in planned locations and assisting diversifying its employment land will be undermined if the Commercial 2 Zone is introduced to replace the large areas in Kingston zoned Business 3 and 4.
Uses that are permissible under the Commercial 2 Zone such as Supermarket(s), Shop(s) and Department Store(s) that were previously prohibited will impact on small businesses that have invested in planned locations and on community service and infrastructure investment provided in Activity Centres.
The unintended consequence of the introduction of the commercial 2 Zone, is that land uses which Council’s Local Planning Policies clearly discourage in ‘out of centre locations’, become as of right or permissible.

June 19, 2013 at 12:39 PM
Timing is everything. These changes come in on July 1. Council’s next meeting is July 2. Not a word has been said or published on anything since last September I think when they put in their submission to the government. The blog has listed what other councils have done and are doing a number of times. When all you get is a resounding silence then alarm antennaes have to go up. I know that Akehurst and his followers think that they are perfect so there’s no need to change anything. It would be good though to let the voting public in on at least some of the secrets. Another thought is whether there were any discussions with local traders or their associations on these commercial zones. I’d guess that this went the way of all consultation in Glen Eira. A big fat zero.
June 19, 2013 at 1:14 PM
Hyams bullshit is unbelievable. Not like you’ll get a 6 storey in a row of shops. How about 10 storeys in Glen Huntly road plus plenty of others that are 5 or 6 already. What a load of crap and not one councillor pulls him up for this.
June 19, 2013 at 1:29 PM
Err .. what consultation process is the Mayor referring to? It must have been between him and the mirror because it certainly wasn’t with residents
June 19, 2013 at 2:25 PM
This is yet another decision by the administration – it has not been raised at an open Council Meeting not was it raised at any Councillor Assembly. Just when exactly are the residents to be informed? Other Councils have been having information sessions with residents but this one is just deadly silent.
It’s going to be the 2002 80/20 (80% minimal change, 20% housing diversity) planning scheme change all over again. Residents kept in the dark and it’s only now, 10 years on, when the full implications are being realised by residents.
June 19, 2013 at 2:46 PM
The primary purpose of the new zones is to facilitate development. Although technically there is no legal requirement to comply with anything in a Planning Scheme, especially any of the minimimum amenity standards, the new zones go further in encouraging unregulated, unfettered development. Already Council has conceded that its existing business zones are primarily for residential development, not employment and services, yet the farce continues that these are “Commercial Zones”. It has never respected the purpose and intent of its Mixed Use Zone, it has no plans to address the open space shortfall in the municipality, it has no plans to improve the ratio of local employment to residents, it doesn’t have a clue what the boundaries of its state-imposed “Activity Centres” are, and it now has a budget problem that prevents major investment to support the increase in population density. The silence of most councillors on planning matters is a concern and suggests they tacitly support the Mayor’s public views.
“What, me worry?”—Alfred E Neuman
June 19, 2013 at 4:41 PM
The “Mayor’s public views” are those provided to him by officialdom. If perchance he does actually believe in what he is espousing then he has been elected entirely under false pretences. I would apply these comments to all other councillors who have consistently and persistently refused to address the problems that this community is facing. Their silence is enough to condemn them all. Their utter silence on any of the proposed “reforms” is a further indictment on their inability to inform, engage, and ultimately represent the community.
My prediction is that nothing will change with planning in the next year. The current inequities will be perpetuated via the new zones. Consultation will consist of a “discussion paper” at best that disguises all the issues and fails to give residents the full picture of what is going on. Once this has been put out for a few weeks councillors will claim that they have “listened” to the community but they were elected to make all of those “hard decisions” that Lipshutz is so inept at. All community views will be ignored and this council will proceed with the current abominations. 9 months of total silence is the guarantee of that.
June 19, 2013 at 10:53 PM
Nearly 90% of all amendments passed by this council in the last few years are designed to generate more residential development. That might be fine in some spots but not when there’s no plan on how to deal with the exploding population. More to the point, there hasn’t been a housing review since the C25 came in 2002/3. That would take some work, expertise and a willingness to plan properly. None of these criteria fit the current band of officers and councillors are either ignorant yes men who swallow everything that they’re told or wouldn’t have the foggiest about what they’re meant to do.
June 19, 2013 at 3:20 PM
Rumour has it Delahunty has the votes for mayor for next year. Pilling Deputy ?
June 19, 2013 at 5:40 PM
Here’s the government’s view and information on what will happen from July 1st. Readers need to compare these changes with what is council’s current position as enunciated by Hyams.
See: http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/148130/New-Commerical-Zones-Fact-Sheet-May-2013.pdf
June 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM
Hyams (MODERATORS: part of sentence deleted) so it is not a surprise what he says in the papers. Rumour also has it, that he wants to be the Mayor for the third time; failing which either Esakoff (already 3 times Mayor) or Lipshultz. Some Councils rotate the Mayorship but this Council keeps the position amongst themselves (the blues). Very transparent group indeed.
June 20, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Does it really matter who is Mayor. When you look at the options it is very depressing. I think it’s time to look at the newer councillors.
• Hyams Failed (MODERATORS: phrase deleted)
• Esakoff a waste of time,
• Lipshultz (MODERATORS: phrase deleted)
• Lobo Never
• Pilling give him a go
• Magee give him a go
• The others next term may be.
I think Pilling Mayor, Magee Deputy 2014. They can swap in 2015. I can’t see anything better unfortunately.
June 20, 2013 at 12:10 PM
Lobo will not vote for Pilling or Magee. So therefore it will be Esakoff.
Hyams did not give Lobo the Deputy job without a deal.
June 20, 2013 at 3:08 PM
Did someone on this forum also said that Lobo will not return after the last October elections and it would be Hyams, Magee and Newton? Did Magee struggle to get in? Delahunty will be the Mayor and she will keep the gang in their boxes.
June 20, 2013 at 10:35 PM
Anonymous 9 – Are you a psychic in your profession, by any chance? Your predictions are almost correct, assuming that you are good in your job and bringing the mullah in your house. The prediction of the councillor called ‘waste of time’ has merit in it, as she thinks she is the best of the lot. The gang will be dancing the Gang-nam style as they have already started with it in the letter to the editor demeaning Michael Danby and insulted
Delahunty their own councillor colleagues. Does this show that the Councillor group are not working together? Lipshultz once wrote in the newspaper that ex Mayor Whiteside was a useless Mayor and is that what the case will be with Delahunty? (MODERATORS: two sentences deleted). This is a well known fact being in Glen Eira for the last 24 years. As regards to the Anonymous 9b, who posted his/her comments today at 12.10 pm. The gang for fear of shame, could also ask Okotel to stand for the position of Mayor (as she received the second highest votes in her ward) and that way, they can pull the strings of the puppet Mayor. It is not sure that Delahunty would be interested given the gambit and ploy of the gang-nam style group. You are right, lobo who may be the under dog and what happens if he has the last say? Could history repeat its self is a billion dollar question.
July 17, 2013 at 8:56 PM
How nice of the Glen Eira Councillor group to shrug off concerns! My husband and I don’t have the luxury of shrugging off concerns. We need to know NOW if the permit-free zone is in our suburb. I know the family who owned the bottle shop at Worrigal rd and Centre rd South Oakleigh. They suffered the minute Greater Dandenong City Council let Woolworths and Woolworths Liquor Store open in the same shopping block. I want to know if this is going to happen to us. I read your comment about the Kingston City Council community consultation http://www.kingston.vic.gov.au/Lists/News/Keeping-shops-in-our-local-shopping-precincts
We intend on going to their open forum and asking Glen Eira to give us back our rates money.