The secrecy, lack of information dissemination, and complete stuff ups continue unabated in Glen Eira City Council. We have learnt that there is now a new, gazetted amendment (c112) for the schedules to the new residential zones. Of course, there is nothing on council’s website and the department’s website gives no information as of Friday 11th October. However, the amendment was gazetted on October 3rd and came into operation on that day.
We do know that once again it is the Minister who is the ‘responsible authority’ and that the amendment is only ‘transitional’ – whatever that might mean! Yet it raises questions galore:
- Why should there be another amendment just 9 days after the gazetting of Amendment c110? What stuff ups have there been – both on the part of council and the department and Minister? But, being generous, perhaps these new schedules represent a modicum of ‘improvement’? Is so, then why wasn’t this thought of before the zones were rushed through with such indecent haste?
- When was council thinking of telling the public anything? or given recent history, was this a forlorn hope to begin with?
- What does this whole continuing saga tell us about planning in Glen Eira? When will adhoc, piecemeal strategic planning be weeded out? When will professional competence be a top priority?
- Since this is now labelled amendment c112, there are many more surprises in store for residents given the gap between c101 and c112.
Here is the gazetted announcement. Make of it what you will!
Planning and Environment Act 1987
GLEN EIRA PLANNING SCHEME
Notice of Approval of Amendment
Amendment C112
The Minister for Planning has approved Amendment C112 to the Glen Eira Planning Scheme.
The Amendment comes into operation on the date this notice is published in the Government Gazette.
The Amendment introduces transitional provisions to Schedules 1, 2 and 3 to the General Residential Zone and Schedule 1 to the Residential Growth Zone.
A copy of the Amendment can be inspected, free of charge, at the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure website at http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/planning/publicinspection and free of charge, during office hours, at the offices of the City of Glen Eira, Corner Glen Eira Road and Hawthorn Road, Caulfield.
JOHN PHILLIPSDirectorPlanning and Building SystemsDepartment of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure
PS: The mystery is solved! After much hunting and detective work we’ve located the text of the illusive Amendment. It does not ‘improve’ one single thing except to state that if a developer applies for an extension to his permit then the current schedules do not apply. Given council’s penchant for granting time extensions willy nilly, and of course not keeping any meaningful records of such extensions, then all continues to favour the applicant. Landbanking can still continue unabated it would seem. This latest Amendment in no way exonerates anyone from the accusation of sloppy and shoddy work. One would think that when something as important as the residential zones are concerned every single word would have been gone over with a fine tooth comb and gaps filled in. It should not take another Amendment 9 days later to correct what wasn’t there in the first place.
Here’s the wording: Schedule 2 to clause 32.08 to the General Residential Zone does not apply to an application
to construct a dwelling or residential building made before the approval date of the planning scheme amendment that introduced this schedule into the planning scheme. The requirements of clause 54 as they apply to clause 54.03-2 or of clause 55 as they to clause 55.03-2 as in force immediately before the said approved date continue to apply.
Despite the provisions of Schedule 2 to Clause 32.08, these do not apply to an application under section 69 of the Act to extend a permit to construct or extend a development.
October 11, 2013 at 7:53 PM
I’ve had enough of this council and the way it works. Everything is done on the hush hush and we’re the ones who keep forking out rates and charges that are going up all the time to keep these ratbags in a job.
I would like to start a revolution and have people not pay their rates until this lot of councillors get rid of Newton, Akehurst, Burke, Swabey and all the top brass. Maybe then the culture and ethics of this place has a chance of being different and giving a damn about residents and what they want to see happen with their money.
October 12, 2013 at 10:41 AM
Speaking of getting who to get rid of, you should add Jamie Hyams not only as Mayor but also as a Councillor. As a Councillor he honed his skills at been manipulative and playing word games crafted to mislead residents who took him on good faith (and learned otherwise, much to their later detriment). As Mayor he has had actively employed these skills to aid the Administration’s backroom dealings (eg. implementation of planning zones) and enable failing to deliver on his promises of support to residents at VCAT hearings – Truganni Road, Morrice Street Child Care, Mavho Street and the Alma Club developments being classic examples.
October 12, 2013 at 12:11 PM
In keeping with the state of Planning in Victoria generally, I notice that Planning Schemes Online is broken–again. The level of incompetence in the way Victorians are governed is simply staggering, and that applies both to State Government and GECC.
C112 seems like a complete and utter waste of time. There are no decision criteria governing an application to extend a Permit, so Council is free to do what it likes, and VCAT is free to overturn a Council decision. Tossing a coin would be fairer and faster. If somebody doesn’t start their development within 2 years of getting their Permit and if their development doesn’t comply with the new Zones and Schedules then their Permit *should* expire rather than be extended. Not that GECC represents me, as I’m only a resident.
October 13, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Agree with the first two comments just comments and threats which are not carried out is like lion dance and the Councillors know that for a fact.
Residents have been treated like mules. Joint action needs to be taken and transparency should be the key for the grievance. Also, Ombudsman has to be informed of the situation with examples and get actionagainst the Councillors whom you have voted for..
There is news in the grapevines that Pilling and Souness are being pulled towards the black side as the easily convinced Councillors that have agreed with the gang in many decisions in the council even get rid of the green trees etc. Will the above two Councillors (one in the second term) drink the poisonous chalice?
Essakoff, Pilling and Okotell, all three of them are from Rosstown Ward and it is obvious for anything to happen. Hyams the two times (MODERATORS: rest of sentence deleted)
Did anyone realise why Hyams (who lives in Muruumbeena) is a Councillor in Tucker Ward, Lipshultz in Camden Ward and Esakoff in Rosstown Ward?
October 13, 2013 at 8:11 PM
This is a repeat of C110 without publishing the required Explanatory Report (currently unavailable), or Ministerial statement.
I hope for the Ministers sake he didn’t refer to C25 amendment consultation as he did for C110 to exempt himself of public notice in the ministerial statement.
I cannot wait to read it.
October 19, 2013 at 10:49 AM
The C112 Ministerial Intervention statement is now available online.
It’s a bloody disgrace. It attempts to justify the intervention by stating “Extensive consultation regarding the new residential zones has been undertaken.”
No further details or references are provided. It’s not consistent with the existing planning scheme amendment C110. The Minister is attempting to correct the errors in the C110 Amendment without any further community consultation. I am fuming.