A brief note on tonight’s meeting. Lobo, Pilling and Lipshutz were all absent. This inevitably lead to the circus of musical chairs, and three separate motions nominating individuals to attend a councillor ‘weekend’. Since nominated councillors had to declare a conflict of interest, and leave the chamber, there would not have been a quorum – hence the repeated motions/resolutions and the musical chairs.
Just how orchestrated council meetings are, how carefully scripted, was in full evidence tonight with countless Dorothy Dixer’s thrown at both Akehurst and Newton in the context of the ‘debate’ on Amendment C120. The dead give-away, was that Akehurst on numerous occasions read his answers from a prepared script! So much for impromptu ‘councillor questions’ that arise directly from the ‘debate’.
A public question on the assertion within the officer’s report that the Alma Club site had paid its open space levies, rather than a land allocation, was admitted to be ‘in error’ and an apology was tendered. Perhaps a council first, but again, this shows not only another stuff up, but that in all likelihood the offending paragraph was intended to mislead and deceive!
On the Caulfield Park depot removal to the Booran Rd/Glen Eira Rd, the infamous landswap was the primary feature with Delahunty moving a motion that if necessary council apply under FOI to see the legal documents involving the landswap, the valuation of the land, etc.
More on all of the above in the next day or so.
July 2, 2014 at 7:10 AM
The clear difference between Glen Eira Council and others I have lived in the past (Yarra and Stonnington) is that in Glen Eira the Councillors support the administration over the residents. In Yarra in particular, the Councillors fully support the residents. Odd because most of the administration do not even live in the Council.
July 2, 2014 at 9:19 AM
Does this mean the center of the racecourse is not going to happen so we are not getting many more sporting grounds? The depot and greenhouse land would not be that large and would be more suitable as passive space anyway
July 2, 2014 at 9:22 AM
The end result of this item was that if council received their ‘share’ of the $4 million, then the depot would be moved. As was stated – ‘No money’ no move!
July 2, 2014 at 1:53 PM
How about sharing the $4m amongst the poor sods living around the racecourse who’s house prices have reduced due to the Caulfield Village development. That seems only fair.
July 2, 2014 at 4:09 PM
$4m isn’t going to come close to compensating people for living in what will become in a few years time a real slum. Thanks gang.
July 2, 2014 at 10:29 AM
Look at The Professor’s twitter. He claims he didn’t even get the letter.
July 2, 2014 at 10:46 AM
Andrea Kellett @AndreaKellett1 13h
“No money, no move”: #GlenEira councillors told there’s no funds for @SouthwickMP proposed Caulfield Park depot move, State must pay.
David Southwick @SouthwickMP 12h
@AndreaKellett1 Disappointing response by #GlenEira Council but I will continue to advocate for the best outcome for #Caulfield residents.
It would appear that Mr Southwick is going to try something new he is going to advocate for the best outcome for Caulfield residents. First time in three and a half years he will have done anything.
July 2, 2014 at 11:13 AM
Who is he advocating to? His own party? I believe this is what a text book ‘political wedge’ looks like!
@Mary_Delahunty: .@SouthwickMP @AndreaKellett1 That’s great to hear. How about we use that $4m dollars pocketed by the State in 2012? @CrJimMagee
July 2, 2014 at 11:28 AM
He is advocating to his navel. The only one that looks up to him.
July 2, 2014 at 11:12 AM
I keep smelling rats all the time with this council. Not one word about the valuer general for years, then not one word about finding out where the money went for another couple of years and never, ever, trying to make the MRC stick to its side of the agreement. Now that the Caulfield Village is done and dusted they all come out of the woodwork. Even better they now want money to move the damn depot when this should never have gone into the park, or should have been moved out centuries ago. Why didn’t Newton and all the gang kick up an almighty stink 5 years ago. Or is the smell of money too much to resist so a few peeps here and there plus Newton’s mates in gov suddenly makes this council change its tune.
July 2, 2014 at 1:43 PM
Electioneering is what it is by Southwick and the gang pretending that they finally care 2 hoots about what happens in Caulfield and they’re helping out their Liberal mate.
July 2, 2014 at 2:21 PM
Spot on. What has Southwick ever done for Caulfield? I cannot think of one thing in the last three years.
July 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM
Cr. Hyams is one of those selected to go on the ratepayer funded Councillor Development Weekend organised by the Municipal Association of Victoria.
While I have reservations as to why such a long term Councillor needs to attend a Councillor Development Weekend, I can only hope he takes full advantage of any and all sessions related to “How to treat residents and ratepayers with respect”.
July 2, 2014 at 11:16 PM
This is clearly an abuse for Hyams to go on ratepayer funded Councillor Development week-end having been on the Council for 3 terms and a much to to be desired Councillor and for that matter a two times Mayor. Does he believe in conscience????
July 2, 2014 at 2:40 PM
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/central/social-mediasavvy-glen-eira-leaders-trade-tweets-over-open-space-and-missing-millions/story-fngnvlpt-1226975195559
July 2, 2014 at 3:05 PM
Polly want a cracker? Cheap shots and none of them can be trusted as far as you can throw them. I’m sick to death of all of them. Macca says it for me – where was the stirring and the outrage with the Caulfield village stuff? All too bloody late now so they can get up on their soapbox and carry on like they really give a stuff about residents. Sack them all and get rid of all these hanger ons and useless councillors who take our money and best of all sack Newton and the whole lot of them. Get rid of local government. They’re wankers and a waste of space.
July 2, 2014 at 4:21 PM
Caulfield village was the Libs on Council helping Southwick helping the MRC.
July 3, 2014 at 8:15 AM
The 4 lib Councillors are working more for Miller and Southwick than the residents. When will the residents (some of whom are called a Bitch) wake up to the nonsense in the Council. Where is People Power?
July 2, 2014 at 4:02 PM
GECC managed to find a way to fund the relocation of the Works Depot from corner of Manchester Grove and Neerim Road in Glen Huntly. Good to know that “every cent has gone to capital expenditure” when council assets are flogged off so the sale of the land didn’t fund the relocation.
July 2, 2014 at 4:35 PM
they would need to end the lease on the Western Stables so the land would be big enough. Would the MRC do this or not? allow the government access to this ‘valuable’ crown land? With this and Neerim Road stables going it would make training unsustainable
July 2, 2014 at 5:02 PM
What will happen to all the wonderful trees? Was that not the reason for the land swap?
July 2, 2014 at 6:15 PM
There was no land swap. CRRT voluntarily relinquished land to the MRC; MRC in turn gave some marginal land and some cash to the State Government, having pursuaded the Govt the land would be really valuable as a park and agreeing to fund the transformation of the land into a public park. The portion of land not leased back to MRC remains a fenced-off dump, providing no benefit to the public other than the display of “for sale” signs. The future of the trees will depend on the use eventually made of the land.
July 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM
The said “Land Swap” also included “a slither of land” (MRC barrister Stuart Morriss’s words) which the MRC had already taken into control by incorporating it into a racing schute and it forms a strategic starting area for one of the race distances. and another large area to the south of the said park which is leased back to the MRC on a perpetual lease for ten years (this means every day a new period begins) and then residents at great expense and effor attended at VCSAT with legal council and had a decision which said the gates should be open.
Now a survey among ignorannt people would only show that the gates are forbidding as an entry point for cars and wheelchairs, mothers with a toddler and pram (it is far to dand=gerous).
And the amazing thing is that council spent our rates to ensure that residents got nowhere and have not shown any interest in residents’ rights.
In this weeks Gklen Eira News our highly paid CEO has illustrated his ignorance of what the original grant state by adding a comma which is not ther and thence he has changed the meaning.Legal opinion obtained indicated that the insertion of punctuation could change the meaning
He either does not care or what else could we conclude?
One big result for the VCAT action was to have the sign on the tunnel removed which said “No pedestrian access”. (just another indication of how unwelcomr the residents are.
Now this has been repkaced with the “RED ARROW”