We have repeatedly stated that we believe that Glen Eira council has been derelict in its planning processes regarding the new zones. Apart from the lack of consultation, Council has not done the necessary strategic work to ensure the best outcome for residents. When major housing policies have not been touched for over a decade, and when reference documents in the planning scheme go back to 1996, then something is drastically wrong.
It also begs the question of why, and how, other councils such as Stonnington, could get the Minister to approve their zones that clearly are far superior to the ‘one size fits all’ model adopted by Glen Eira. It’s important that residents realise what could have been done, and hence, was NOT DONE!
Below, we present an overview of what Stonnington has achieved via its GRZ and RGZ schedules.
Stonnington has RGZ2 at 13.5metres height. It also has, in both the RGZ1 and RGZ2 Schedules, as well as ALL the GRZ schedules, the following requirement under site coverage –“Basements should not exceed 75% of the site area”. This is important because it means that underground car parking excavations have to be well contained within the site envelope. This helps avoid earth anchors onto neighbouring properties and problems with earth movements that might affect adjoining houses.
Stonnington also has countless other requirements for the GRZ zones in their respective schedules – none of which appear for Glen Eira. Here’s a sample –
Fences – Maximum height of 2 metres in streets in a Road Zone, Category 1. Other streets 1.2 metres maximum height.
Walls on boundaries – Walls should not be located on side boundaries for a distance of 5 metres behind the front façade of the building fronting the street.
Side and rear setbacks – For a distance of at least 5 metres behind the front facade of the building fronting the street, setback new buildings (including basements) a minimum of 2 metres from at least one side boundary and at least 1 metre from the other side boundary up to 3.6 metres in height.
Landscaping – In addition to the requirements of B13, at least one canopy tree should be planted on the site.
The most telling difference however, and as we’ve stated before, is the number of GRZ zones that Stonnington applied and the HEIGHT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EACH. In other words, they have dissected their suburbs, planned according to recent developments, and didn’t adopt a ‘one size fits all’ approach as Glen Eira did. When we keep in mind that the heights for GRZ in Glen Eira is an all encompassing 13.5 metres,(PS: oops, this should read 10.5m) it is remarkable what other councils could, and did, achieve. Here are the Stonnington GRZ schedules and their respective height limits –
Grz1 – 13.5m
Grz2 – none specified
Grz3 – 12m
Grz4 – 12 m
Grz5 – 9m
Grz6 – 11.5m
Grz7 – 10.5m
Grz8 – 12m
Grz9 – non specified
Grz10 – 9m
Grz11 – 12m
Grz12 – 9m
Grz13 – none specified
September 25, 2014 at 8:38 PM
our councillors sold out residents by allowing no public consultation on the planning scheme, this will come back to bit them on the bum
September 26, 2014 at 7:21 AM
Kick them up their a**e
September 26, 2014 at 7:46 AM
No matter which way you look at it Glen Eira Council has screwed up big time and rather than going into lock down they should coming up with new schedules that will resolve the issues that are seriously impacting residents.
Clearly, neither the NRZ nor the RGZ and GRZ were implemented with any analysis, creativity or consideration for residents. The supposed certainty is that purely that developers can go for the max and residents can’t object to the max.
Councillors voted unanimously and retrospectively for the zones and not one of them has entertained the thought of initiating changes to the zones.
Sure making changes to the zones will take time but that is not an argument for doing nothing. The longer it takes for them to get off their R. Soles and look at how to improve the zones, the more damage will be done.