Announcing Plan Melbourne, Mr Guy promised 50 per cent of suburbs would be protected from development. Glen Eira got much more. Nearly 80 per cent of the city, which includes Bentleigh, McKinnon, Ormond, Elsternwick and Carnegie, would be protected from apartment and unit-style development, Ms Crozier declared, setting an ”enormously positive example for other councils to follow.
Source: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/not-all-going-to-plan-in-tale-of-two-cities-20140628-3b0pj.html#ixzz3kxUMrkZ0 (June 29th, 2014)
So much for the spin, the propaganda, and the misinformation. We certainly take issue with the 80% of Glen Eira as ‘protected’. But even more offensive is the claim that ‘Bentleigh, McKinnon, Ormond, Elsternwick and Carnegie’ would not suffer from ‘apartment and unit-style development’. The reality is that huge swathes of these suburbs are now geared towards facilitating 3, 4 and even higher storey developments – and it’s all thanks to the new residential zones and council’s woeful record in strategic planning.
Ormond, in particular, is testimony to the falsity of the above claims. The suburb is barely 2 square km in its entirety. Exclude those areas designated as ‘parkland’ or public utilily zones, then the area available for development shrinks to about 1.83 square km. Then there’s another 25 or so hectares zoned Heritage, but this hasn’t stopped council from giving the green light to development by zoning large parts of such areas as GRZ1. In addition, large sections of these areas are also under a Special Building Overlay because of flooding concerns. What all this means is that in Ormond, just under 42% of the suburb is zoned as appropriate for 3 storey dwellings. Another 8% of land is zoned either C1Z or MUZ with no height limits at all. That makes Ormond the most potentially overdeveloped suburb in Glen Eira with over 50% of its land designated for 3 storeys or higher.
Readers also need to remember that Ormond is NOT an Urban Village. It is a Neighbourhood Centre, where there is supposed to be less development. How that is possible with such zoning beggars belief. But this is planning in Glen Eira – inept, pro-development, and with no thought as to the long term impact on people’s lives. When over 50% of a suburb (which is not a major activity centre) is geared towards high density development, then there’s something drastically wrong with planners, and the councillors who allowed this to happen.
Here are the figures upon which the above calculations have been derived –
C1Z – 54,329 sqm
GRZ1 – 745,837 (THE LARGEST GRZ1 AREA IN GLEN EIRA)
GRZ2 – 21,182
MUZ – 10,113
RDZ – 97,740
September 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM
Carneigie must be ten times worse.
September 7, 2015 at 6:30 PM
I’m very very surprised that Ormond has got the most 3 storey zoning. It’s a lovely area that is now being thrashed because of the zones. Heritage does not count one iota as they showed with getting rid of frogmore. In 5 years time this suburb will be a slum and unrecognisable.
September 7, 2015 at 10:46 PM
Interesting analysis, but here is some reality check on the suburbs density in Glen Eira circa 2011 from http://profile.id.com.au/glen-eira by clicking on each area indicated.
Suburb Name Density
persons/ha
Glen Huntly 52.12
Carnegie 42.55
St Kilda East 41.36
Ormond 37.51
Elsternwick-Gardenvale 37.45
McKinnon 35.80
Caulfield 35.07
Murrumbeena 34.97
Caulfield South 34.48
Bentleigh 32.47
Caulfield Nth & East 28.98
Bentleigh East 28.36
Of course the zoning gives a potential to grow. It would be good to see that alongside the figures above. Ormond is perhaps the winner on zoning, but Glen Huntly is by far the winner on density and still going strong. Of course it is easily fixed by getting rid of Glen Huntly and subsuming it into the 3 bordering suburbs of Caulfield East and Caulfield South. It has been done with Patterson and Coatsville. I would not be surprised if some administrative genius is working on it already.
September 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM
2011 data won’t be up to date by a long shot. Doubtful if Caulfield East with its thousands of new dwellings has even been factored into these figures. Lumping together Elsternwick and Gardenvale is pretty dubious too. Next to Melbourne, Stonnington and Port Phillip, I would say that Glen Eira is the densest municipality and we’re not even an inner city one.
September 8, 2015 at 9:11 AM
Why would anyone believe politicians, as they are puppets for their developers mates, The amount of corruption that has been uncovered year after year linking politicians to developers and there crooked deals etc. Looking around Melbourne (MODERATORS: sentence deleted). What GE need is a flush-out, the CEO and all the top managers need to be moved on. The public also need to wake up and clean out the Hyams, Pillings Essacoffs, Soundness and Lipshutzs. These councillors are sycophants to the CEO and his systems, as they have demonstrated year after year they cannot represent the residents. If this is done we may have a chance of having some good urban planning, and not this under-cover system masquerading as democracy
September 8, 2015 at 11:31 AM
The council is little prepared for what’s happening in Ormond, a look around Ormond show the nature strips on street after street littered with garbage, mattresses, broken furniture, pots, heaps of discarded cardboard boxes, you name it it there, and often laying around for months at a time.
Higher density calls for higher effort to keep streets clean, Newton and our councillors have failed to so show any understanding of what is needed to accommodate these changes. They just don’t care.
Residents need to move these incompetent people out of office, and make a fresh start, otherwise it will be just more of the same old garbage.
September 8, 2015 at 5:57 PM
Rubbish is one thing. Letting tradies block off streets for development and stay in one hour parking zones without penalty is another. Enforcement in Glen Eira is a total joke.
September 8, 2015 at 7:22 PM
Macca is right that Glen Eira is the 3rd densest LGA in the benchmark Eastern Metropolitan Region as follows:
LGA Name Density 2015
Port Phillip 50.11
Stonnington 41.96
Glen Eira 36.85
Boroondara 28.78
Bayside 26.49
Monash 22.48
Kingston 16.93
In addition, by 2036 Glen Eira density will likely exceed 50 persons / hectare. However, it will still likely to be the 3rd in the benchmark region. This reality check should be looked at from other problems than purely development and population growth, which are part of all LGAs.
September 9, 2015 at 8:04 AM
especially like the 2.4 hectares of landlocked by fences land. how many soccer pitches would this be not of the size of the mini pitch they have provided!

September 9, 2015 at 11:24 AM
Matthew Guy is now the leader of the opposition. Does he believe that his aspirations to be the next Premier of Victoria will be zilch for the damage he has caused with his residential zones? Many liberal MP’s will loose their seats because of Guy.
September 9, 2015 at 8:32 PM
Assessing zoning on a suburb-by-suburb basis isn’t a very sound basis for making decisions, especially for smaller suburbs. An arbitrary redrawing of suburb boundaries could change the picture completely. Carnegie is roughly twice the size of Ormond. If you divided it into 2 approximately equal pieces, using say Munro Ave and Coorigil Rd as the boundary, the northern half would be more than 50% C1Z/MUZ/RGZ/GRZ and substantially worse off than Ormond while also having NO land zoned PPRZ. No councillor lives there though.