Glen Eira Council considering height limits for commercial zones in Glen Eira under planning scheme review
June 5, 2016 12:00am
Chad Van Estrop
Moorabbin Glen Eira Leader
HEIGHT restrictions could be imposed on commercial zones in Glen Eira following a review of the council’s planning scheme.
Glen Eira’s director of planning Ron Torres said the review, expected to be complete by June 30, would consider height limits.
Angry residents have been calling for the limits on developments in activity hubs like Centre Rd, Bentleigh and say commercial zones, which do not have mandatory height limits, are fuelling over development.
“The key theme that the community raised consistently were the rate and level of development occurring in Glen Eira and in particular around our shopping centres,” Mr Torres said of recent community consultation sessions.
“While our policies don’t contain numerical heights they talk about transitioning down in scale to the residential areas.”
The review comes as two apartment blocks — one of eight storeys (33 dwellings) and another of six storeys (22 dwellings) — have been approved for Centre Rd since April.
Mr Torres was concerned the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal was not implementing council’s policy when their decisions were appealed.
“What our particular concern has always been is that VCAT is not giving the due consideration to our policies,” he said. Mr Torres said VCAT was “not necessarily” setting a precedent with its planning decisions.
He said the planning review would address development scale and size, car parking, heritage protections and neighbourhood character but that any changes to Glen Eira’s planning scheme would need approval from planning minister Richard Wynne.
RMIT professor of urban studies Peter Norden backed the community call for height limits within commercial zones. “I can see that if we starting getting (more) six and seven storey developments on Centre Rd it will conflict seriously with the local urban context,” he said. Prof Norden, a Centre Rd resident, said development was necessary to cater for Melbourne’s booming population. “I’m not against development but it needs to be done in a way that is balanced and not giving green lights to greedy over development.”
In a letter to council last year Mr Wynne said he was concerned that Glen Eira’s planning policy “may not be providing adequate guidance in relation to development within Glen Eira’s activity centre.”
June 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM
The $64 question is what height will they think is appropriate and if this should be the same everywhere.
June 6, 2016 at 10:08 PM
Anonymous, you raise the very central and crucial point. There should not be a one size fits all as council has been keen on doing. East Bentleigh is not Elsternwick and vice versa. Then what happens if council decides that 6 storeys is okay everywhere? That is not good enough and introducing height limits alone is definitely not enough. Council has been forced to do this review. They haven’t gone along willingly. What they put out that doesn’t meet resident expectations should be challenged vigorously.
June 6, 2016 at 12:10 PM
For whatever reason, Mr Torres has attempted to defend the indefensible.
June 6, 2016 at 3:41 PM
Dead right. The indefensible is 12 years of slack arse planning that’s given developers all they want. Congratulations to Hyams, Newton, Akehurst. They have achieved their ambition.
June 6, 2016 at 8:07 PM
Haybuggar is the culprit who sold the residents for liberals sake.
Bad damn publicity for Mathew Guy as the zones (without public consultation) will haunt Mr Guy and his ambition to become the Premier are almost gone.H
June 6, 2016 at 10:26 PM
Off topic but important – http://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/inner-south/barrister-investigating-glen-eira-council-charging-4500-a-day/news-story/25dc3af224ec2ac9907489e450893b4a#load-story-comments
We have literally had a gut full of ratepayer monies being spent in this fashion. The toll would by now be well over a quarter of a million we estimate over the past few years. We also remind readers that other councils have been busy implementing the new legislation that requires them to include a dispute resolution process into their Councillor Code of Conduct. Glen Eira has been busy attempting to gag residents even further by their proposed amendments to the Local Law.
Further, the legislation permits an individual councillor, or a group of councillors to go directly to a Councillor Conduct Panel. That is the cheaper option instead of paying a lawyer $4500 per day. Why hasn’t this happened? There is no requirement for a council resolution for a single councillor to seek a conduct panel hearing. All he or she has to do is submit her allegations and evidence and the hearing will be held. Instead, we find the machinations of this council continuing at great public expense and the culprits hide behind dubious and highly questionable claims of ‘confidentiality’.
June 6, 2016 at 11:02 PM
whata bunch of wankers. Bully boys dressed up as men.
June 7, 2016 at 1:42 AM
VCAT LOSSES… Rather interesting to note that usually cheap towm planners defend council decisions (on behalf of reswidents) but when it comes to sorting out “VISCIOUS COUNCILLOR INFIGHTING” with an election looming themn GECC briefs Queens Council experts.
It has once again embarked on a bitter attack on a councillor who tries to represent residents’ views as was the case in the last month’s of the last group, when they manufactured charges against cr Penhuilurak who also tried to represent us independently. The idea of democracy in the GECC IS DEAD AND WHATEVER THE IDEALOGY IS THAT THE GROUPERS ARE KEPT IN POWER BY A FORM OF HATRED.
June 7, 2016 at 10:21 AM
It is noted that the Mayor will not make any comment on the independent investigation while Cr Lipshutz states on Twitter that: “Comments about investigation into Glen Eira Council are overblown. One Cr is a problem but all are working well. No bullying as reported.”
This “twit” is in itself bullying and totally inappropriate given the review. I trust that he will be censured. Reading between the lines, this “twit” is actually saying that one Councillor is actually listening to residents and that it is really annoying other Councillors.
June 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM
Likely the liberal party get a hefty campaign donation for all this easy bullying money. It hone hand shaking the other