A comment has been received from a resident which we feel should be highlighted here as a separate post. The suggested questions are excellent and the recommendations sound and pragmatic.
We have commented numerous times on how many dwellings have already gone into Glen Eira in the past 5 years and how we are well ahead of projected population growth if this trend continues much longer. (See: https://gleneira.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/more-on-hyams/
We have also highlighted how the recent planning scheme review and its ‘workplan’ will take up to 20 years to complete if this council has its way. That is literally much too late to save the neighbourhood centres such as McKinnon, Bentleigh East, Ormond, Caulfield South, etc. We are already seeing 7 storeys in Hawthorn Road, Caulfield North.
Thus, instead of producing a meagre 2 structure plans in 4 years (and somehow Elsternwick has already been written off without any community consultation), action is required now. That means reorganising the budget, setting aside funding for outside consultants and beginning the work immediately. We also have to question why, when the Minister ordered council to move its butt way back in December 2015, the first structure plan isn’t already on the drawing boards and in the public domain for consultation.
We repeat again. These councillors have failed its residents and do not deserve to be re-elected.
Here is Mr. Ptok’s comment in full –
I was not able to attend, but am grateful for the information provided here, and the comments.
As someone involved in objecting to a number of developments in Carnegie (including appearing at VCAT at the recent 90-94 Mimosa Road application, which got approved today), I have penned a few questions I emailed the candidates in Rosstown Ward. Still waiting to hear back from some of them, but the following includes some key steps which, I believe, will help strengthen council’s position in VCAT hearings. Especially in light of today’s decision, I have concluded that the only hope of preserving anything of our neighbourhoods, is implementing the full Planning Scheme Review Work Plan in the coming term of council. This may require paying external consultants, but if it’s not done, looking at the speed of development in Carnegie, there won’t be much left of the old Carnegie come 2020.
Please feel free to circulate / ask your candidates, if you think any of the following can help strike a better balance between competing needs:
Dear [candidate],
I am a resident and voter in Carnegie.
I believe that whilst development is necessary, it needs to strike a balance between the needs of existing community, the developers, and future residents. Having been involved in a number of VCAT hearings, I believe there are things council can do to better manage the developments.
Could I ask which, if any, of the following actions you are willing to initiate and support, if elected to council:
1. Regular (at least quarterly) reporting on net dwelling approvals and dwelling type. This should include retrospective reporting, at least to 2013 when the new residential zones were adopted, ideally to 2003 when the municipality adopted policies to differentiate the municipality into housing diversity and minimal change areas.
This will allow comparison of dwelling approvals to population targets, and confident answering of the question: “is Glen Eira doing its fair share of meeting new housing required in Melbourne?”
2. Council’s VCAT watch report should include, where decisions went against council, a section on “actions council can take to avoid a similar outcome in future”.
This will give Councillors a clear idea of what would “strengthen” the Glen Eira planning scheme to ensure council decisions stand.
3. A review of the Planning Scheme Review Work Plan, including a presentation of council’s representative at VCAT. As the workplan currently spans more than a decade and relies heavily on internal resources to be completed, the concern from a resident point of view is that by the time the workplan is completed, the municipality will no longer be recognisable. As resident and ratepayer, I would be very happy if council used funds to pay external consultants so the work required can be completed in the next term of council.
A review of the work plan will give the newly elected Councillors an early opportunity to shape the management of development in Glen Eira.
4. Seek an amendment to the planning scheme to better manage change in neighbourhoods and where different planning zones meet. The amendment I am suggesting is that the maximum building height of any new development be the lower of:
– the height of the lowest adjoining property (including across the road) plus two stories, or
– the maximum height permitted under the zones.
This approach strikes a balance between the needs of neighbours (who would prefer a 1 storey increase) and developers (who would prefer going straight to the maximum), and allows for more managed change of neighbourhood character over time.
I am asking the same questions of all candidates in Rosstown Ward and look forward to your reply. If you require any further information on any of the points raise, I am of course happy to answer any questions.
Kind regards,
Greg Ptok
October 6, 2016 at 6:21 PM
One of the most amazing facts regarding Glen Eira’s development is the fact that it has been acknowledged that there is many decades of housing stock already approved. We must work out a way(through a loophole) in the development requirement acts and call all approvals to a halt until we are able to study the effects of the currently built and approved buildings.
October 6, 2016 at 6:39 PM
When the residential zones were introduced in secret, the carrot that Hyams, Newton, and Akehurst dangled under Matthew Guy’s nose was that Glen Eira had 80 years worth of growth space – and this didn’t include the areas zoned commercial. That was the “vision” that this triumvirate committed Glen Eira residents to.
October 6, 2016 at 9:45 PM
And the, unknown to residents, the reward from Mathew Guy to the triumvirate of Hyams, Newton and Akehurst was two fold. First a decision to exempt Council from undertaking any community consultation on the zone imposition and secondly to extend that exemption for two years after that imposition.
Thank god when with last remaining standing member of triumvirate (Hyams) pushed through yet another, unknown to the community, request for the an extension for exemption from consultation the Planning Minister said no. At least the Planning Minister had our backs because the other 8 Councillors didn’t. Their retrospective approval of the zone imposition and silence on further request for a further extension is proof positive.
At last night’s forum neither no guts Pilling or Esakoff showed, decided to avoid rather than address issues. The next forum on Sunday arvo is Tucker, I suspect Hyams will pull the same stunt. Despite Hyams’s love of secrecy, residents now have the knowledge, facts and data and to grill him when he repeats his bs mantra. Can understand him wanting to avoid exposure but can’t tolerate it.
October 6, 2016 at 8:16 PM
Sustainably living has to be a key issue for GE to a place worth living in the near future. There are already signs than the place is not coping
1/ The amount of rubbish littering our streets
2/ Dysfunctional road system due to congestion
3/ Raising rates / more people may make it a more expensive place to live, and not the opposite
4/ Lack of open space to provide residents with what’s needed to have a healthy environment to thrive.
5/ Flooding issues through hard surfacing
6 Air quality problems through increasing traffic flows
7/ Over crowed/dysfunctional public transport system
8/ Over crowded schools and kindergartens and childcare centres
9/ Inadequate tree cover to cope with climate change
10/ Inadequate drainage to cope with flash flooding
11/ Inadequate building standards to provide healthy living in new developments. ie. developers profit over healthy living.
12/ Tree decline through over development, coupled and no strategy for future proofing for climate abatement.
13/ Lack of participation and democracy at the local government level leading to alienation of residents.
14/ Lack of transparency at local government (the slippery slope to corruption)
There are many many more, at the present we are just making it up as we go, which is a sure recipe for failure.
October 7, 2016 at 6:34 AM
Almost all of the 14 items you have listed are beyond local government. Schools, public transport, town planning laws, kindergartens and childcare are all State Government or Federal Government matters. The councillors we are about to elect can do nothing at all toward helping you. Like most voters you are amongst the uninformed.
October 6, 2016 at 6:52 PM
Well done Greg on your action. Unfortunately this experience is not unique to your neighbourhood and it is not until it occurs that it is fully understood just how negligent (??) previous Councillors have been in creating a developer’s delight. All credit to you for actioning the cause, the bottom line is none of the previous Councillors deserve to be re-elected. Only by change can balanced outcomes be delivered. Let other residents know as they ultimately make the decision on our future through the Council election process. Lets collectively get new Councillors in.
October 6, 2016 at 10:12 PM
A wonderful set of questions Greg so my thanks. I’ve been reading many of the blurbs put out by the candidates and am becoming annoyed at the sameness of them. Everyone is promising everything and jargon like opposing inappropriate development is dominant. Very few are actually saying what they will do once they get in or what they think is inappropriate development. I’m beyond politspeak. I’ve had 8 years of this from these current councillors. That’s enough for a lifetime. If they can’t or won’t answer Greg’s questions or commit to his great recommendations then they don’t get my vote.
October 6, 2016 at 10:38 PM
Did’t Cr Oscar once suggest that the Council write to Richard Wynne to freeze the developments pending review of the zones as ordered by the Minister and no one really knows how long it will take.The Planners need to go once the minister recognises the desperation that the people of Glen Eira have been facing since 2013.
October 7, 2016 at 9:15 AM
Oscar’s a fake, he votes with the conservative most of time, even after telling telling them why they are wrong.