A new application has come in for Loranne Street, Bentleigh which signals another nail in the coffin for council’s structure plans. According to the proposed new zoning, the East side of Loranne will be reduced to a 2 storey height limit. The application is for 4 storeys in line with the current zoning of Residential Growth Zone and whilst the number of apartments is not revealed, we assume that this will be anywhere from 25 upwards. Given the current zoning the chances of the developer getting his 4 storeys is pretty good
What this means is that council’s calculations on housing numbers are basically works of fiction. Council has previously simply provided figures on how many sites will be ‘downgraded’ to lower heights and how many ‘upgraded’ to greater heights, with no accounting for how many of these former sites already contain dwellings that are at the maximum heights (and densities) introduced in 2013. And this will continue for at least another year, and even longer for our neighbourhood centres which are bereft of any decent controls and with no time lines set for the introduction of anything to ameliorate the continuing damage.
May 26, 2018 at 3:42 PM
Loranne is gone. There’s already been a 3 & 4 storey approved on the other side. So much for council’s draft plans that are stuffed.
May 26, 2018 at 10:53 PM
Whose fault is it anyway? Why blame the Council? The state government directs Councils.
May 27, 2018 at 10:00 AM
Seriously? Why is Glen Eira the only Council not have have structure plans in place? This Council has been negligent with planning matters.
May 27, 2018 at 4:44 AM
I a invite the Tucker Ward councillors to comment on this latest development, if they have the courage too. I for one would be interested to hear their opinions on this development.
May 27, 2018 at 10:02 AM
I think Cr Hyams replied above, It translates as … it’s not our fault, no it never is, is it.
May 28, 2018 at 8:27 AM
Council argued that 4 storeys was appropriate and didn’t require any further consultation when it secretly negotiated how the new zones would be applied to Glen Eira. The outcomes have been what they intended. Aidan Mullen criticized RGZ at a public forum yet seeks an expansion of RGZ to ensure more concrete boxes, negligible permeable area, poor drainage, inadequate carparking, disrespect for the character of the established residential areas. There remain a lot of unresolved issues, making it inappropriate for them to seek changes to their Scheme via S20(4). And still we don’t see published any correspondence or meeting minutes of discussions between Council staff and the government.
May 28, 2018 at 5:49 PM
Transperancy is not one of Councils speciality areas.
May 29, 2018 at 12:11 AM
“unresolved issues” that is the issue. They our “councillor”s do not want to resolve the issues, why would they. We have nine very pro development councillors up there now, as was the council before that, and the one before that, and on and on. Our councillors have for decades sent a very clear message to the bureaucrats, Just build, and we will be your smoke screen.
One lesson from all this is, do not listen to what they say, “as words can be misleading” Just look at the way they vote on these issues, that is where the truth lays.
May 29, 2018 at 11:11 AM
Jamie/Jim and Nina, hang your head in SHAME; you are not doing the job for your constituents who voted you in to power. Lets talk about tram lines not parking its a diversion Jim no more.
May 29, 2018 at 3:42 PM
Very frustrating and disappointing.