Whilst council plods on with its long awaited structure plans, urban design frameworks and god knows what else it hasn’t achieved as yet, the most crucial element in both council’s and we presume the state’s planning is what COVID has produced in terms of migration slow down, oversupply of apartments, businesses closing, and rising house prices for detached dwellings. In short, the boom period for many individuals is well and truly over.
Given these factors, it becomes even more important that council’s strategic planning is fully cognisant of what lies ahead and what has been happening in the past 3 to 5 years. The oversupply of apartments is not something new – it was already evident in 2017. The rising costs of houses means that less and less can afford them, despite mortgage rates being at an all time low. Renters are also leaving in droves – often returning to stay with parents. And given the absence of overseas students, and migration figures to rival our lowest numbers since 1946, any strategic planning simply has to factor all this in.
We have had Victoria in Future 2019 predicting population growth that is now in tatters. The impact on housing supply and demand therefore must be reassessed and planned for accordingly. Council continues to argue that things will return to ‘normal’. But when? In 3 years time, in five years, or never? Besides, structure plans are not meant to be created and then left hanging in the wind for decades. They are supposed to be ‘live’ documents that are continuously reviewed and reworked. So given all the above negatives, why is council still demanding 12 storey apartment complexes in Carnegie? Or even higher along Nepean Highway? Do we really need all this high rise when apartments are what is suffering the most?
All of the above makes it absolutely crucial that any Housing Strategy does not ignore these events. Simply looking at ‘capacity’ as we were told with the first version of the Built Form Frameworks for Bentleigh East, Caulfield North and Caulfield South, is in our view a meaningless exercise. Capacity does not equate with need. It simply says, ‘yes, a 20 storey building can go here’. It doesn’t answer the crucial question of whether or not we need 20 storey buildings to cater for population growth over the next 15 years. Nor does it tell us whether existing infrastructure can cope, nor how much it will cost to introduce the required infrastructure.
We have extracted two pages from a 2020 report from the National Housing Finance & Investment Company which is worth a read. The full document is found at: https://www.nhfic.gov.au/media/1621/nhfic_state-of-the-nations-housing-report_accessible-updated.pdf
Please take a close look at their projections and the arguments upon which these are built.


April 21, 2021 at 5:55 PM
Thank you. This really puts things into perspective.
April 21, 2021 at 6:35 PM
Housing supply should surely be a State Govt action and councils implement that directive. What seems to be happening in Australia is State Governments want to have Federal Level power and councils want state Government power. State Governments need to pass some of their power to the federal level so a uniform platform is introduced across ALL of Australia. Power to comes from the top down otherwise we have seen what happened with Covid 19 safety; a mismatch ALL across Australia. What is the State Government doing to introduce uniform planning….nothing they would prefer to pass the buck and we get up starts in council trying to punch above there weight
April 21, 2021 at 9:01 PM
Headlines galore about apartments selling for up to 40% less than what they were bought for. Most will stand empty. We’re creating wastelands.
April 21, 2021 at 10:17 PM
Remember China, when they just kept building and building apartments, retail centres etc. and no one ever occupied or used them, it just kept employment up and boom times rolling along.
As soon as possible Andrews and Morrison will offers insane monetary inducements and citizenship rights for overseas students (likely South America this time) this will open the flood-gates for quasi students and business opportunities for corrupt generals and their bureaucrats to funnel their ill-gotten gains into our property markets. It’s all far too easy to keep milking our 150 years of built amenity and selling it for peanuts.
I recently attended a Melb. Water. seminar and the take home message was, we (Melbourne) are going to hit the wall with our drinking water supply by 2028 (That what they told us, true or not true, how would I know). The seminar was about finding strategies to ease the publics negative perceptions and preparing the public to accept the idea of recycling sewerage water to drinking water. They called it the YUK FACTOR.
Points like stopping logging water catchments that is reducing our run-off of pure water into these catchment was just brushed aside. There is no plan here, just overdevelopment on top of unsustainable development, and band aid solutions to keep the bureaucrats, consultants and engineers in work and money.
30 years of unrestrained greed and unsustainable growth at all costs may well be our road to ruin. The officers that inhabit our planning department have no Plan B. they know nothing else other than to utter ad nauseum bigger is better there can never be too much traffic or pollution, and more is never, never enough. How on earth do we change the song theses choir of fools sing.
I now see people sleeping in our local park here in Glen Eira, some of them females. Where for here, do we go? Eat shit and drink piss is on the bureaucrats drawing boards as we speak.
April 22, 2021 at 10:26 AM
The idea that the more one builds the better housing affordability will become has been blown out of the water – despite low interest rates.