We’ve received this email from a resident asking for Tucker Ward candidates’ responses –
Dear Candidates,
As you are a candidate for Tucker Ward, I would like to hear your views about the following local problem.
If you visit Mckinnon station and walk along Nicholson street, you will see exposed pilings, both within the station and external rail corridor. The job to rebuild Mckinnon station and reinstate appropriate aesthetic finishes to the rail corridor is clearly unfinished and not done to an equivalent standard as Ormond Station.
Since the beginning of the level crossing removal, we have been asking what the final structures will look like. Early on, we were told there would be a concrete wall with additional fencing for safety and screening. This has not been the outcome.
In the rush to re-open McKinnon station first, the completion of the concreting and aesthetic finishes were not completed. Not only are the exposed pilings and partial concreting unsightly, but the incomplete nature of the works appear to be unsafe (e.g., the exposed sharp edges of the metal pilings). This will inevitably encourage vandalism, which has already started.
However, the job is finished according to the Level Crossing Removal Authority, with the exception of some revegetation along parts of the rail corridor. They claim that Glen Eira Council have signed off on the “design”, including the exposed pilings and partially concreted beams. This clearly contradicts the concrete covering of these same structures that have been done at the Ormond location.
Most of Bent Street and Nicholson Street have already been sold for development. There are simply not enough long-term residents left to garner interest in this local issue.
So my question to you is: What will you do, if elected, to ensure the Level Crossing Removal Authority really finish McKinnon station and the surrounding rail corridor?
Kind regards,
xxxxxxxxx
Resident of Nicholson Street McKinnon, Tucker Ward
October 17, 2016 at 2:24 PM
Just a thought is there a possiblity they will landscape over it, hiding the ugliness?
October 17, 2016 at 4:21 PM
Not on topic but FYI!
Tomorrow the Caulfield Village Precinct 2 application is to be heard at VCAT with Philip Martin as the member. It will be interesting to see the cave-ins that council produces this time if their cave-ins on Precinct 1 are to be any guide! This also follows a compulsory hearing earlier in the year.
October 17, 2016 at 5:45 PM
Doesn’t bode well for other LXRA projects, such as Skyrail. It is annoying that successive State governments establish Authorities to shield themselves from having to provide any information. LXRA’s Director of Communications told me LXRA was within its rights to do whatever it wanted with its land. I pointed out it still had to comply with the Planning and Environment Act. We both laughed, because he knew Amendment GC37 meant LXRA didn’t have to comply with anything in a Planning Scheme—LXRA was unconditionally exempt. At least the Liberals, incompetent as they may have been, placed some constraints on level-crossing removal projects along the Caulfield-Dandenong corridor via the predecessor to GC37, Amendment GC15. LXRA still hasn’t published its final design either.
October 17, 2016 at 9:31 PM
I want to know why not a peep has come out about this from council. Okay, they mightn’t have the legal control over the land but they could pipe up and put their opposition to what’s going on a hell of a lot more.