The lack of public open space in Glen Eira has been noted again and again by residents and council. It is therefore important to review council’s performance over the past 6 years since the introduction of its 2014 Open Space Strategy to see exactly what has been achieved. Not much we would say and is evidenced by the following public question (and response).
The spin merchants are really out in force with this response. Here is why:
- After nearly 6 years only 34% of the 2014 ‘very high’ priority recommendations have been completed. Most of these recommendations were for the creation of additional open space. Not achieved!
- Aileen Avenue cost over $2m and has been rented for the past 3 years. It is a stone’s throw from Princes Park. In the latest open space ‘refresh’ the idea of arterial roads being barriers has been jettisoned. So Aileen Avenue was bought with the argument that Hawthorn Road was a ‘barrier’ despite the fact that there were lights providing safe crossing to Princes Park. We are now at the stage that part of this road will be converted into ‘open space’ together with the property. Another year or so of waiting is in line and despite strong community opposition.
- Perhaps council should define exactly what ‘connectivity around Virginia Park’ really means when they are in favour of at least 3000 new apartments in Virginia Estate?
- We have to laugh at their so called ‘achievements’ when we read ‘input into Caulfield Racecourse Reserve land planning’! etc.etc.etc.
The best example of smoke and mirrors comes with council’s claim that in 6 years they have added 4000 square metres of public open space. We remind readers that council counts public open space as the TOTAL AREA of a site. That means that pavilions, car parks, shelters are included in the calculation. So now we have the reverse argument: because two scout halls have been demolished this is supposed to mean that we now have additional open space. Council can’t have it both ways. Either these structures are not counted as part of open space and hence the municipality’s open space is much less, or these structures are counted and hence the removal of 2 scout halls adds a big fat zero to the amount of public open space available.
Worth pointing out is that Booran Reserve has 11% of its 17,800 square metres sealed off from public use behind huge iron wrought gates! Also council has had ‘management’ responsibility for this site since 2010 and the land did not cost them a penny. The play ground was opened in April 2017. Again, 7 years and close to $13m to create this park. Would also be interesting to know how much concrete covers this site?
Gardenvale park has an interesting history. It had a public acquisition layer placed on 53 Magnolia road shortly after the park opening . This was then removed by council in 2008. Then in 2015 the public acquisition overlay was put back on. But only after the house had stood derelict and abandoned for years and was being used by squatters and druggies. The land size was a paltry 253square metres according to this link! (https://www.onthehouse.com.au/property/vic/gardenvale-3185/53-magnolia-rd-gardenvale-vic-3185-9626138). Council claims it was 497! Thus, years and years of doing nothing resulted in increased pricing for the land and the addition of perhaps 18000 square metres to our total public open space.
Further, the Mimosa/Mile End road measures approximately 1100 square metres. The public acquisition overlay was applied in 2016. Thus another 4 years have gone by without any progress. How many more years residents will have to wait until open space is provided is anyone’s guess!
The bottom line is that this council is more concerned with ‘show’ than with the acquisition of new green open space. Here’s an example of the 2016/17 budget. Nothing has changed where the vast majority of the open space levy goes on ‘development’ rather than the purchase of new open space.
Time and time again residents have been promised at least a 50% split between the acquisition of NEW open space and development of existing open space. That’s what the 1987 open space strategy promised. Even better was that council passed several resolutions that all of the levy was to be used for new open space in 2014. That of course went out the window with the gazetting of Amendment C120.
Council’s record in acquiring new open space in a municipality that has the least amount of public open space per capita is really appalling. This new strategy does nothing to fix the problems. The message from residents is absolutely clear. Stop squandering a fortune on needless ‘redevelopments’ and start creating new and viable open space.
February 13, 2020 at 2:17 PM
Great post. The squillions spent on useless projects that don’t add a metre of new open space is criminal. Part of the agenda was borrowing another $30 million for crazy projects like 5 mil for eat street. That amount of money is at least 1000 new metres of open space if it was spent on land and not fancying up and closing off more and more streets.
They have done nothing to solve the issues. Vote them out.
February 13, 2020 at 3:44 PM
It really looks like council has been hoarding its open space levy money, to help cover the costs of their Caulfield Racecourse wishlist. Their spending spree in the southeastern corner plans for 3 new pavilion, news ovels, synthetic soccer fields, car parks and that’s just the start.
If they get their way and I truly hope they don’t this area it will look like most of Glen Eira’s boring public open space, large treeless, windswept grassed area surrounded by car parks and managed with weed killer and graffiti removal teams. There will be little thought to any decent tree cover or providing any reasonable passive open space needs that residents have be crying out for years.
The Open Space Refresh failed to come up with the percentages on how our existing open space is allocated, ie., how much of our open space is dedicated for sporting needs and how much is dedicated for passive use. (fail)
The council bureaucrats fear this figure because it will show an overwhelming amount of our limited public open space is dedicated for the use of sporting clubs, even though only 10% of Glen Eiras population participates in organised active sport. This imbalance needs to be redressed, even if it means taking land back off the clubs and turning it into quality passive open space areas, fair is fair. (fail)
The refresh did say we are down to “8 square metres of open space per resident” and falling, soon it will be in the negative. (fail)
The real joke is our open space planners keep talking about a Urban Forest Strategy for GE, which I might add seems to be on the never-never list, possibly because they have realise there is no place to plant trees because nearly all our open space is playing fields. (fail)
I say rip down the fences and put trees on the ovals, I for one have had enough of being treated like second class residents where my open space needs are considered subservient to the needs of satisfying the sporting clubs.
February 14, 2020 at 7:19 AM
Interesting glen eira residents are only getting the parts of the racecourse the MRC doesn’t need. The council don’t have ant say in the matter
February 14, 2020 at 8:56 AM
Council’s record on open space is possibly the worst in the state. Let’s do nothing except get more and more apartments so they can get more money is the constant refrain.
February 15, 2020 at 1:08 AM
Friends of Caulfield Park are trying to remove GEC Depot from the massive park and have stated that the Racecourse Reserve would be great!
February 15, 2020 at 3:19 PM
The draft open space refresh is open for comment, I noticed the pdf downloads of the refresh are not searchable, at least not on my computer, which of course means you can not search the doc. by keyword etc.
https://www.haveyoursaygleneira.com.au/OSSRefresh?utm_source=ehq_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ehq-Open-Space-Strategy-Refresh&utm_source=ehq&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=website
February 15, 2020 at 4:32 PM
Not not searchable. Are they trying to cover something up?
February 15, 2020 at 5:02 PM
Likely not covering up anything, just trying to make it hard as possible to be user friendly.
February 16, 2020 at 1:19 PM
Council can’t afford to improve open space because since 2016 it continues to squander millions of rate payer dollars on technology, consultants and staff wages to implement a business improvement strategy with little to show in the way of improved services to customers, return on investment, governance and oversight, due diligence or transparency.