Council’s rhetoric and unabashed hope, is that by facilitating more dwellings on a single site, this will have an impact on ‘affordability’. We are supposedly lacking smaller townhouses so changing the zoning schedules in 10,000 sites, especially in the NRZ, will permit more of these multiple dwellings to be built and the price to come down.
Despite all the spin, there is absolutely no guarantee that:
- Instead of townhouses/units developers will abide by this aspiration instead of building apartment blocks where they can cram more apartments into the site. Council has already admitted that it has no control over WHAT IS BUILT.
- We are also highly skeptical of the claim that ‘smaller’ apartments will have a major impact on pricing and therefore become more affordable.
East Bentleigh over the past few years has had an enormous amount of 3 or more dwellings on a single site. All one has to do is take a walk along many of the streets running off Centre Road to see what the results are. But even more telling is that we have done a search on the sold prices for some of these medium density dwellings and find that they remain far from ‘affordable’ even when compared to dual occupancy prices.
Here are some examples and they show recent results –
- The first sale features one two storey townhouse in Agnes Street, East Bentleigh. There are 6 units on this combined site (nos – 8-10 Agnes Street). The property was sold on March 31st, 2022 for $1.200,000. Its size is 194 square metres!
See: https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-townhouse-vic-bentleigh+east-138824343
- Another example is 3/3 Heather Street, Bentleigh East. There are 3 units on this site. Unit no.3 has a land area of 77 square metres and sold on the 4th December 2019 for $975,000 – well before property prices hit their peak. Even with the current drop in prices it is still estimated to go for about a conservative $900,000
See: https://www.propertyvalue.com.au/property/3/3-heather-street-bentleigh-east-vic-3165/46018891
Admittedly, this is a very tiny sample of what is happening in East Bentleigh. But it should also be borne in mind that this suburb is ‘cheaper’ than properties in Caulfield North, Elsternwick, McKinnon and Bentleigh. We therefore do not believe that simply facilitating denser development on individual sites throughout all of Glen Eira will impact greatly on price. Council has no control over this anyway. What the most likely scenario will become is that we will still not have smaller townhouses, but more and more apartment blocks. Why? Because it is cheaper to built a two storey apartment block with 5 or 6 units, rather than 3 town houses. This has already occurred in Hudson Street, Caulfield North as just one example.
If the housing strategy is adopted as stands, then this is the future writ large in our view. A denser but not cheaper Glen Eira and a hell of a lot more apartments!
October 31, 2022 at 3:57 PM
Agree. What’s happening in East Bentleigh is awful. Streets are packed with cars and dog boxes springing up everywhere. And they aren’t cheap.
October 31, 2022 at 4:18 PM
I’ve had a look at the Hudson Street properties and what they are. Seems like apartments in these areas don’t cater for more affordable homes. They work as ‘luxury’ apartments. This site has got 8 units and the asking price for a 3 bedroom unit is starting from $1,310,000.
A while back I also got a flyer in my letter box for the 13 storey eva build in Glen Huntly road. Prices listed there were – 3 bedrrom starting from$1,195,000; 2 bedroom from $895,000 and 1 bedromm from $635,000. None of this is ‘affordable’ for an apartment. Makes you think why on earth do we need 13 storey buildings when they add zilch to affordability and basically serve the interests of well heeled buyers who want a view.
November 1, 2022 at 8:46 AM
Planning by fantasy. The quality of the buildings can be shockingly substandard. This point is never addressed. This point of substandard structure makes affordability or value for money even more suspect. Council has also abandon all pretext of control and care here. Just like they have on almost all other planning and control issues. It seems to me all this planning is done by bureaucrat sitting behind desks and never venturing out into the real world to see what they are creating. Other than to by themselves a coffee across the road.