The State Government has now released the next swathe of planning interventions for 25 activity centres. Whilst it may be argued that Glen Eira does slightly better than Bayside or Boroondara in terms of height limits, the overall impact of the proposed changes are catastrophic for residential amenity and urban living.
At the time of writing, we have not sighted any response from Glen Eira on their website. In contrast both Bayside and Boroondara were quick out of the blocks in condemning this latest intervention. See: https://www.bayside.vic.gov.au/news/statement-activity-centres-program-consultation
and
Once again there is nothing in these newly released documents which provide any information on: infrastructure costs, traffic, open space, etc. All we’re told is that developers can now build to their heart’s content and bypass resident objections in most cases. Even the government run consultation surveys are again nothing more than a tick the box exercise (see the Boroondara link for access details). We are still to see what plans are in store for Bentleigh, Elsternwick, Glen Huntly and others.
It is indeed extreme folly to believe that what will eventuate will be affordable housing. These inner suburbs basically cater for ‘luxury’ apartments selling between $2m and $3m or dog boxes that in no way suit a family.
Here’s what is proposed for Carnegie –

Whilst the council structure plan remains the same (and already includes allowance for 12 storeys) the surrounding areas are severely impacted. Please note that the light blue sections in the above image can now be built to 3 storeys and the darker blue to 4 storeys. If the land is ‘large’ (and this isn’t defined) then the limits go to 4 storeys or even 6 storeys.
When this is compared to the current zonings, then hundreds upon hundreds of sites are being earmarked for height increases and therefore a massive density rise. For example here are our current zonings:

- All the areas shown as light pink in the following image are currently zoned as NRZ (neighbourhood residential zone) meaning they are either single or double storey dwellings. They can now become 3 and 4 storeys if they are on an average 500 square metre site, or if larger, the option is to go to 6 storeys.
- There are very few 3 storey town houses, which means that most developments will consist of apartment blocks and not town houses. Besides, building an apartment means that more dwellings can be squeezed in compared to town houses.
What we are witnessing is the creation of unsustainable development that will become an urban wasteland that consists of apartment blocks following apartment blocks with no regard for heritage, open space, environment, and certainly no cheaper housing that suits families and downsizers. If our councillors aren’t screaming blue murder right now, then they are not doing their jobs in representing their constituents.
September 11, 2025 at 5:44 PM
It is continuing a trend Labor established long ago of being corrupt, incompetent and dictatorial. Fortunately for them, the Opposition is a rabble and useless. Despite all the verbiage there is much that isn’t disclosed and which could change at Ministerial whim. I’m not happy that Labor thinks 6 storeys is appropriate next to me. We’ve already had our amenity compromised, something that Steve Dimopoulos supported. The Development Facilitation Program is hopelessly corrupt, and now “Deemed-to-Comply” rules will remove 3PP most appeal rights. They haven’t done much detailed analysis of traffic impacts, parking requirement, likely overshadowing, open space to meet recreational needs, drainage capacity and other infrastructure, how the result will be a healthy demographic mix, what they’ll do to compensate for the loss of trees and vegetation. Meanwhile corruption flourishes in the planning system, with almost daily headlines revealing a new outrage. Detailed questions should be asked of the Member for East Bendigo and her plans for all the railway stations she has in her electorate.
September 12, 2025 at 10:36 AM
I agree with you wholeheartedly. I certainly don’t want to live next to a six storey apartment block that blocks out all the sun and overlooks my bedrooms and living rooms. We’ve also just spent a mini fortune in installing solar panels. Had we known this was going to happen, then we probably wouldn’t have done this. There is no regard by this government for existing residents. It’s all about the headline and the pretense that they are doing something to solve the supposed housing shortage.
September 11, 2025 at 5:49 PM
A guestimate only. Looking at the rezonings, I would say that well over a thousand properties have been involved. And that’s only for Carnegie and its surrounds. When this happens for all the other suburbs, then we’re probably looking at around seven or eight thousand new upgraded zonings. That’s totally insane. It will turn more than two thirds of Glen Eira into the apartment capitol of the south east considering we have heaps of railway stations and activity centres and only 38.9 square km.
Anyone want to bet how many of these new places will be three bedroom, or how many will be 2 bedroom? And what does this mean for onsite parking and traffic?
September 19, 2025 at 8:41 AM
Unsustainable development delivered in bucket loads.
Trees and vegetation are vanishing in droves, with little capacity for replacement. The Australian Government’s own national risk assessment highlights the gravest dangers we face, yet there is no plausible reasoning why so many uncoordinated plans and strategies exist across all levels of government—contradicting one another and accelerating the destruction of community living conditions.