Residents do have cause for concern given the ‘results’ which have thus far been produced by council in regard to the structure planning ‘consultations’. The plans are supposedly based on community feedback. Yet very little of what residents wrote is reflected in any of these documents. When even council is forced to admit that ‘opposition’ to ‘private development’ features prominently in most of the areas listed, but fails to make an appearance in the ‘objectives’ section listed for further action, then something is drastically wrong.
Below is what council sees as the road map for the next phase of ‘consultation’ for four of the designated activity centres – (the screen dumps come from the ‘Transformational Concepts’ report). Please keep in mind that no explanation has been given why Hughesdale and Murrumbeena should be included as part of the first cabs off the rank instead of say Ormond, McKinnon and even Balaclava, Glen Huntly and Caulfield which according to the latest version of Plan Melbourne are now designated as MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRES!
What we have here is thus another example of a Clayton’s Consultation where decisions have already been made and the ‘results’ of community input are deliberately distorted, or completely ignored!
March 27, 2017 at 8:24 AM
This is non stop with consultation at Glen Eira, nothing ever gets through.
March 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM
Does anyone have thoughts on what might be an effective way of “outing” Council on their survey summaries. As reported here, the development snapshots are simply not consistent with the consultation comments. The extent of the disparity in theme between “results” and feedback is ridiculous.
March 27, 2017 at 11:17 AM
Public questions
Letters to the editor
Flyers to households
Complaints to MPs
Emails to councillors telling them what a sham this consultation is.
March 27, 2017 at 11:31 AM
Is it the type of question that can be asked at Council meetings?
March 27, 2017 at 12:59 PM
Do not see why not. Answers will be waffle probably but they should be made to say why they aren’t accurately representing what residents said or want.
March 27, 2017 at 11:54 AM
Close or amalgamate Councils and pass the planning to state government who in turn should should hand it overi to VCAT who are more qualified than the Council. Shocking to hear that labor party who gave empty promises to the residents that they will revise the law on development based on which won some seats and now have declared a double mess. The labor party knowing that there would be chaos by their new laws are running to open schools in areas where they did not want to build. A case in question is a proposed new school in Virginia. All the 3 parties promise the world to garner votes then shift to project for self glory. By now people are convinced that all parties are cut from the same cloth.
March 27, 2017 at 10:38 PM
How are you Oscar since your humiliation last October?
March 27, 2017 at 12:00 PM
I have slowly been going through the reports and admit to being less than impressed with what council sees as the priorities that residents have pointed out. Development, or over development is the major topic for most people. That is almost entirely ignored.
March 27, 2017 at 1:38 PM
Spend my money so I can be conned. Nothing has changed with council and how they don’t do consultation. Very annoyed and these dumb councillors swallow it all.
March 27, 2017 at 7:59 PM
Typical. Another example is the supposed consultation with residents re the East Village ( Virginia Park) site. They give a list of statements to. be ranked and a box that says other. A site where residents can go online. That’s it? As shown in this post council will take absoloutly no notice of residents statements. What a farce.