It’s bad enough when council releases documents that misrepresent community views or only tell half the story. But it is even worse when council allows straight out porkies to form part of their strategic planning in the hope, we surmise, that these lapses won’t be discovered.
One of the latest documents is the Bentleigh Background Report with the wonderful subheading of Building Transition Plan. On page 9 of this ‘report’ we find the following:
We are told (twice) in the above that council’s proposed changes are to limit current streets zoned for 4 storeys and change this into 2 and 3 storey townhouses. Nothing could be further from the truth. The areas earmarked for change along Vickery, Godfrey, Oak, Blair, Bent & Nicholson are NOT ZONED FOR 4 STOREYS. All the proposed changes are currently in the neighbourhood residential zone (ie 2 storeys) and with a huge flood listing (SBO). That means the buildings can be even higher!
Here is what is proposed. All sites filled in with yellow are currently zoned NRZ and will now be rezoned to GRZ.
The overall rezoning from these few streets alone plunges another 40 or so properties into the General Residential Zones. No strategic justification is supplied – except the admission that the current zones themselves have been a disaster – and nonsense such as this – ….the plan seeks to introduce a greater spread of housing type, with a particular focus on medium density terrace housing within the suburban streets. This housing type is a good transitional building form linking the lower scale residential areas with the core of the activity centre. So council’s ‘solution’ is to allow more three storeys in ‘suburban streets’ instead of ensuring that those areas zoned for 4 storeys are either dramatically reduced or include provisions in the associated schedules that safeguard amenity.
Nothing but nothing can excuse a council that repeatedly disseminates information that is inaccurate and deliberately misleading.
July 30, 2017 at 12:37 PM
Council is claiming it has prepared these “concepts” using community feedback. FFS it should demonstrate how this substantial expansion of activity centres is driven by community feedback rather than what Council wants [and has already endorsed]. Is this another “testing the waters” exercise where they back off if community opposition is trenchant?
July 30, 2017 at 5:58 PM
Very disappointing indeed, sadly this bureaucratic culture of deception, isn’t likely to change whilst most people remain ignorant and passive.
July 30, 2017 at 9:29 PM
Does anyone know how council can force anyone to build a townhouse instead of a two storey apartment block or a garden townhouse as they call it instead of a three or four storey apartment block. Since Wynne’s come along and changed everything the ball’s right in developers court and I can’t find anything in the legislation that would stop developers from doing what they want. We;re talking guidelines by council anyway and they don’t mean a thing.
July 31, 2017 at 6:53 PM
Interesting question. Anyone know how specific other Councils are with this type of thing? Regardless of the (rights and) wrongs of it all, are Council guilty of attempting to be overly, unnecessarily and potentially problematically precise? And aren’t these terraced townhouses ridiculously only even potentially possible on consolidated blocks? How can you target separate privately owned lots and houses in whole streets for joint sale, demolition and consolidation?
July 31, 2017 at 9:48 AM
Changing some of the zoning isn’t meant to stop development. Areas that are already full of 4 storeys are built out. Move on to the next streets and let them have more development. It is crazy.
July 31, 2017 at 12:05 PM
Little if any justification for anything that has been proposed. Revealing that many of the photos used aren’t even from Glen Eira. Suppose they couldn’t find anything that’s close to what they want to portray since most of what’s been built is gray, ugly and will deteriorate in less than 10 years. They also need a new artist to draw some decent pictures.
July 31, 2017 at 3:42 PM
Bill Shorten talking tax reform today, with not a mention of Negative Gearing changes. The circus will roll on, street after street will fall to block after block of nasty looking sun stopping cheaply built but expensively priced fire traps. And the jets will keep coming and coming bringing more and more people to rent them. It’s all Jobs and Growth talk masking the unsustainable growth model, coupled with corruptions and crime.
Little Hong Kong is here and quickly growing into King Kong.