Council never fails to surprise when it comes to open space. The announcement that they have purchased a site in Neerim Road, Carnegie is, in our view, a mixed blessing indeed. Whilst we have consistently argued that it is Carnegie that requires a huge investment of funding for open space, we also query the motives behind this purchase.
Residents have been repeatedly told that council’s rationale for all its open space endeavours is based on the 2014 Open Space Strategy. Well, unfortunately, this particular purchase is at odds with what the OSS recommends. The ‘expert’ recommendations were for the purchase of land on the WEST SIDE of Koornang Road. This property is on the east. See the two images below –
Points to consider:
- Will this purchase become the $3.61 million reason to ram through the sell of council’s carpark and set the stage for 8 storey developments?
- Neerim Road itself is hardly a ‘pedestrianised’ street. It is full of high density dwellings already. Thus access from Neerim Road itself would certainly be limited
- Residents on the south side of Neerim are also ‘disadvantaged’ given that the OSS decries the creation of open space that necessitates the crossing of major roads.
- The crucial question of course is what does all this say about council’s intention to first listen to the community and then to act on the community’s views. If this sizeable amount of money has already been signed off, then what prospect is there that if the community doesn’t agree with the sell off and ‘repurposing’ of council land, that residents will be listened to? Or is 600 square metres in the most noisy, and inaccessible position, plus being overshadowed by 8 storey dwellings, all that residents can hope for?
- Finally we again question the consistency and value of any council ‘policy’ when it can function to justify any decision when council so pleases, and then be ignored – also at council’s whim and hidden agendas!
August 17, 2017 at 8:05 PM
I tend to agree that this could be an opportunistic purchase. There are many homes for sale in nearby streets that are in the gap areas of the open space strategy and which are far cheaper than this commercial property. This begs the question whether council even bothered looking elsewhere in Carnegie.
August 17, 2017 at 10:21 PM
A hell of a lot of money for one shop. Residential properties would be a lot less and maybe even on bigger sized land.
August 17, 2017 at 10:40 PM
Spend 3.6 mil and get double back by flogging off the carpark and you can claim you’re providing open space
August 18, 2017 at 12:24 AM
They may make this purchase into a new car parking area, and claw back a similar size piece of the car park up near the library for use as public open space.
——————————————————————————–
This list below is properties Glen Eira has sold mostly under the last administration. The two residential houses 278-280 Neerim Road, Carnegie are just a stones throw the latest purchase. 64 Rosstown Road, Carnegie would also have made good open space, this likey sold for under $500.000. The now gone old Scout Hall in Mile End Rd, Carnegie, is almost next door to the site they are trying acquire to make another street park in that immediate area.
There was a certain ruthlessness and haste in which the former administration stripped our community assets we had owned for generations.
It maybe no wonder that the Ex CEO shot-through like a Bondi Tram, after his asset stripping business ran out of steam. Leaving the new CEO to rid herself of the old guard and its unsound practises of budget balancing via asset stripping.
What we do now know is that we ratepayers are now forking many millions and millions to buy-back land in much the same the same areas, at hugely inflated prices.
Council Works Depot / Corner of Neerim & Manchester Grove Glen Huntly
Residential house / 16 Staniland Grove, Elsternwick
Public Hall / 675 Centre Road, Bentleigh East
Residential Land / l6 Elizabeth Street, Elsternwick
Child Care Centre / 2 Oakleigh Road, Ormond
Child Care Centre / 23 Oakdene Crescent, Murrumbeena
Bowls Club / 27 Victoria Street, Elsternwick
Library / 144 McKinnon Road McKinnon
Pocket Park / 105 Orrong Crescent, Nth Caulfield
Pocket Park / 412 Glen Eira Road, Caulfield
Residential Units / 281 Hawthorn Road, Caulfield
Pocket Park / 44 Station Place, Glen Huntly
Retail Shop / 64 Rosstown Road, Carnegie
Public open space / 81-85 Rosanna Street, Carnegie
Residential Houses (2) / 278-280 Neerim Road, Carnegie
Depot / 473AA Neerim Road, Murrumbeena
Residential House / 67 Orrong Road, Elsternwick
Vacant Land (part of Ripponlea) / 13a-14c Gordon Street, Elsternwick
Commercial Offices / 296 Glen Huntly Road, Elsternwick
Commercial Offices / 341 Hawthorn Road, Caulfield South
Residential House / 16 Heather Street, Bentleigh East
Disused Infant Welfare Centre / 14 Mackie Road, Bentleigh East
Residential Land / 15 Caleb Street, Benteiigh East
Vacant land / Rear of 62 Glen Orme Avenue Ormond
Former library / 6 Maple Street Caulfield South
Pocket Park / 21A Riddle Street, Bentleigh
Former nursing home / 15 Hawthorn Road Caulfield
Former nursing home / 6-8 Freeman Street Caulfield South
Residence / 4 Freeman Street Caulfield South
Residence / 2 Freeman Street Caulfield South
Former car park / 3 Fallon Street Caulfield South
Vacant Land / Rear of 854 Centre Road, East Bentleigh
Scout Hall, Mile End Rd, Carnegie
Former Ages Care Units / 3-5 Station Avenue McKinnon
The Council Works Depot / Corner of Neerim & Manchester Grove Glen Huntly sold for about 7 million at the time. Now such a site would fetch what 30 million plus almost enough to pay for GESAC
If you can add to the list please do so, as a complete record would be good.
August 18, 2017 at 10:20 AM
What a list. Indefensible since the lack of open space has always been known and emphasised for the last 30 years.
August 18, 2017 at 12:27 PM
Absolutely! as there are some parks that have been sold on this list.
And please remember the sitting councillors of the day, and there maybe one or two culprits still sitting in the chamber this day that have voted to dispose of our land assets.
Laneways still get sold off regularly, even these small strips could provide services for residents with effect landscaping to counter the loss of vegetation we are all seeing with this ongoing wave of development.
The open space shortage was denied up to recent times, and the bureaucrats are still refusing to do or release the percentage figure of how much passive open space we have to how much active open space we have.
One attempt tried to inflate passive open space by including car parking areas as passive open space.
If they honestly did this percentage comparison; the consultants for the 2014 strategy flatty refused to include this comparison. We may find out we have less of a open space problem, and more of a car problem.
Questions as to what services our public open space could and should provide never gets discussed. The status quo just get reinforce time and time again, handing the lionshare of our open space over to sporting clubs for 16% percent of people can use one day a week.
August 18, 2017 at 12:02 PM
https://mrc.racing.com/news/2017-08-14/changes-to-the-mrc-executive-committee. it says he is on the Caulfield Racecourse reserve trust. Thought it didn’t exist
August 18, 2017 at 2:44 PM
MRC is oblivious to gov. They will continue along their merry way
August 18, 2017 at 3:02 PM
Obviously the biggest Park in Caulfield will never be open to the public
August 18, 2017 at 3:05 PM
You may wish to listen to this week’s edition of Talking to the Max where David Southwick was interviewed. He stated that the gov is about to introduce legislation and that a committee (minus council) has been appointed. We won’t hold our breaths given past history!
August 18, 2017 at 3:36 PM
So he residents will have no representation at all
August 18, 2017 at 3:48 PM
Not necessarily. We interpret his comments as meaning that council/councillors will not be included. The role of residents remains to be seen. We stand to be corrected on this however since nothing is as yet in writing to the best of our knowledge.
August 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM
The site is proposed for 4 to 5 storeys in the Carnegie draft concept but will quickly become 6 to 8 storeys. The neighbourhood wrecking ball is coming.
August 18, 2017 at 3:51 PM
Been looking at the real estate pages and 47-53 Rosstown road is up for sale and its over 2000 sqm. Would be perfect for open space and to stop 12 storeys from being built. Might cost more but 2000 metres is a decent park not like 600 metres.
August 18, 2017 at 4:15 PM
They seem to have been trying to sell for a long time. Could be good as it would join the Skyrail free space at the back.
August 18, 2017 at 7:06 PM
But it’s not next to a site designated for 6-8 storeys