Council’s brilliant planning has provided another developer with a major bonus. This concerns 285 Neerim Road, Carnegie. A permit was granted by VCAT in 2015 for a 4 storey and 41 apartment block.
Residents will remember that in 2017 council produced its first version of its structure plan which was gazetted as an interim height amendment (C148) in 2017. The site was then designated as having a four storey mandatory height. With the latest version as of August 2018, the site suddenly became suitable for a 5 storey mandatory height limit. No explanation of course as to why within the space of a year council (and the minister) saw fit to increase the height in this area.
Now we have what has happened so often in our neighbourhood centres as this section of the application makes clear
The developer has decided that instead of 4 storeys, he wants 5 and instead of 41 units he is aiming for 46. Visitor car parking will go completely and there is even a further reduction in the requisite parking for retail/shops from 20 to 16. And of the 46 proposed apartments, 33 are two bedroom, 9 are one bedroom and the magnificent total of 4 as three bedroom. That makes it a total of over 91% as one and two bedroom dwellings. So much for ‘diversity’ as required in the planning scheme!
What irks us about this application is not the right of the developer to ask for more. He is perfectly entitled to. The concern resides with council’s failure to offer any justification for its decisions, much less listen and act upon resident feedback. How any reasonable person can accept that in April 2017 council proposed and the Minister agreed that 7 storeys was needed to protect again ‘inappropriate development’ and then in just over a year to suddenly use the same argument and claim that 12 storeys is required to avert ‘inappropriate development’ is simply mind boggling. And yet our illustrious councilors did not bat an eye but voted this in! Thank you indeed councilors for your ineptitude and disregard for the community!
March 14, 2019 at 6:09 PM
The election is over Labor has had it’s thumping win, the cash is flowing and it’s back to business
March 14, 2019 at 7:27 PM
Asking this council to justify anything is asking for the impossible. The real reasons for everything they do is never out in the public. On the changes for the heights I would say they’ve been bought off with all the grants they are suddenly getting and enjoying the increasing numbers of rates. What goes on under the table is something to think about to.
March 14, 2019 at 8:07 PM
yeh, like brown paper bags full of developer contributions
March 14, 2019 at 7:59 PM
We might as well disband the council planning dept and save the ratepayers the cost. Just let the developers run free, which is almost what they are doing now. Liveability RIP.
March 14, 2019 at 9:45 PM
I’ll second that and throw in the councillors too.
March 15, 2019 at 6:48 PM
The developer lies. The Carnegie Structure Plan hasn’t been formally gazetted. All we have are some changes, made on an interim basis, that our councillors want but which haven’t been scrutinized by a Panel, and contradict everything Council heard from the public on the rare occasions the public was asked. Just because a height limit of 5 storeys has been introduced doesn’t mean 5 storeys is appropriate or acceptable. The development is next to a low-scale residential area, so 5 storeys contradicts a key Design Objective. Not that I expect this application will be carefully assessed against all the decision guidelines.