Presented below is the statement/question from one resident concerning planning for Caulfield South. We urge residents to listen carefully to the question the response from Torres.
COMMENTS
Given what has been happening in South Caulfield in recent times it is extraordinary that this council has refused to progress the work on this centre in any meaningful way. We do not for one instance buy the excuse of lack of resources, or for that matter the need to provide sufficient strategic justification that will take another 2 years at least. One could very well ask:
- How much strategic justification was submitted for the first interim height amendment for Bentleigh & Carnegie in 2017? One FOI result clearly indicated that practically nothing was submitted to justify the minister’s intervention. The outcome was surely ‘political’ rather than based on sound housing strategy!
- Torres would like readers to believe that the so called City Plan is something entirely new compared to the Quality Design Guidelines that were accepted by council years ago. These guidelines had already stated on page 4: Protection of character and lower scale of shopping streets Community feedback has demonstrated a clear priority to protect the character, heritage and lower scale that define Glen Eira’s shopping strips. These strips are the communal centre of Glen Eira’s diverse neighbourhoods and as such they are a physical representation of the community’s collective culture. Recent planning applications for taller buildings in the heart of these shopping strips, have demonstrated the community’s strong concern about the potential erosion of the character of Glen Eira’s shopping strips.
The Quality Design Guidelines seek to address this aspiration and concern by developing
appropriate guidance for the traditional shopping strips that encourage:- protection of heritage facades and street scale; and– limiting building heights to a maximum of 5 storeys.
Hence, the proposed height limits had been set years ago and not as Torres implies with this latest document!
The Implications
One thing is abundantly clear. The longer council (deliberately) delays and delays then it will become almost impossible for any Design & Development Overlay, or any Structure Plan to successfully argue for 5 or less storeys, when permits have been granted for 9 storeys. Is this the secret agenda?
The latest example of what’s happening is the newly advertised application for the old bowling centre in Hawthorn Road. It seeks:
- 9 storeys
- 90 apartments
- A supermarket
- 182 car parking spots (with waivers of 10)
Some statements from the actual application are worth citing given council’s pathetic definition/interpretation(s) of ‘community benefit’, its archaic Municipal Strategic Statement and the abject failure to provide anything in the planning scheme to ensure sustainable development (ie landscaping). All of these gaps the developer naturally uses to his advantage:
The height of the proposal is considered appropriate on the basis that it clearly addresses its principal Hawthorn Road frontage, with the provision of a community benefit through an activate road corridor which integrates with the streetscape, the design response appropriately considering its relationship to neighbouring land uses and built form.
Clause 21.-01-2 recognises that Glen Eira’s population will continue to increase slightly over the next 20 years, however the size and growth of households are anticipated to be noticeably different. It highlights the State Government’s projection that the city will have 58,000 households by the year 2021, resulting in an increase of 13,000 dwellings from the recognised 45,000 households in 1996
Given the neighbourhood centre context and otherwise the locational circumstances of the site relative to existing built form, the site does not lend itself to extensive landscaping. Nor is there an opportunity to provide deep soil planting areas. This arrangement is not uncommon within this part of the activity centre. The insistence on the provision of this would unreasonably compromise the development and would be inconsistent with the activity centre context.
If this application does get up, then Hawthorn Road will look like this! Plus, the possibility of 3 supermarkets within a 70 metre radius, plenty of car parking waivers and the potential creation of a great wind tunnel given recent proposals. Well done council! Everything appears to be working to plan!
February 7, 2020 at 1:00 PM
Nearly fell off my chair with Torres saying the city plan is the “first tangible” bit of planning. A load of crap. Bugger all has been achieved in 4 years.
February 7, 2020 at 5:12 PM
Anonymous,
Bugger all?
Not so, according to Ms McKenzie’s reflection of the past four years, as written in her weekly memo.
“Tomorrow is my work anniversary with Council. 4 years ago on 8th February I walked through the front doors to the Town Hall, and made my way to my office on the 1st floor. Four years later not much has changed with my daily arrival routine, but as I reflect on our journey as an organisation I’m proud of the progress that we have made in delivering our vision to create a liveable city through outstanding places, excellent services, and a stronger community. It’s been a team effort and I wanted to take this opportunity to acknowledge the significant contribution of my executive team colleagues who have been there all the way, and of course all of you who turn up every day with the intent of doing your bit to make Glen Eira as great a place as it can be. You make it a pleasure for me to get out of bed and come to work each morning and I’m equally enthusiastic about the next 5 years as I enter my new contract term….
February 7, 2020 at 5:55 PM
Perhaps she should define exactly how her tenure can be interpreted as “progress”.
February 8, 2020 at 9:11 AM
Started with hope and promises and quickly faded into a corporate wimp with no leadership hallmarks or credit to define her for her predecessor that mouse of a man Newton.
February 7, 2020 at 7:36 PM
Ron Torres does a classic Nero, fiddles while the city burns around him
February 8, 2020 at 12:49 PM
The excuses about lack of resources does not wash. Had a quick look through the financial report from the agenda. Mega bucks being spent on nothing. Millions already gone for structure plans that they can’t get right. Should set priorities that planning is top of the list and not all this other stuff that can wait and we can do without.
February 8, 2020 at 2:16 PM
Jeff, from the developers and their financier mates point of view our planners are getting it very right. We suckers pay the wages and the developers add the cream, without any complaining and a smile on their dail, so guess who gets all they want.
Cr. Sam Aziz from Casey Council has his mates vote extended paid leave for him, and this happens with IBAC kicking in their doors, just image how safe the planners in GE feel. Under the radar rorts are happening big time across all levels of our governments, and as we are seeing in Casey the councillors can be right in there leading the pack.
I guess we should be grateful the rorters haven’t emptied our bank accounts and shot through. Although who would be the least bit surprised if tomorrow’s news plonk this onto our kitchen.
February 11, 2020 at 11:57 AM
Only four years and the devastation to Glen Eira has been mammoth! And they call this progress and congratulate themselves. I had high hopes when Ms McKenzie arrived thinking she would stand up to the planning department. So disappointed.
February 12, 2020 at 11:11 AM
Great news for residents living near towers in Caulfield Village “The properties in Haywood Street have been re-zoned and they now sit on a fortune”. Crs Delahinty and Hyams commented that they should be happy about that. Meeting called FOR ADDED NUMBERS OF UNITS AT 31 STATION TREET WITH NO MENTION OF HAYWOOD STREET OT NORMANBY ROAD TO SEEK RESIDENTIAL OPINIOON FOR EX[ANSION OF THE VILLAGE..