This post is not about whether councillors should declare a Climate Emergency or not. Rather it focuses on the officer’s report and asks readers to determine how objective such a report really is and whether this is merely another example of council’s attempt at public grandstanding whilst in reality doing nothing at all.
Once again we have a report that purports to present all the relevant information so that informed decision making by councillors may take place. This report is far from ‘informative’ or objective. The take home message from this report can only be MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO!
Three options are proffered to councillors (see below)
Option 1 is clearly the most proactive and given the fact that we are told that declaring a Climate Emergency requires ‘immediate’ action this would ostensibly be the option most appropriate. We even have Ms Krull’s response to Ahtanasopolous’ question of the 25 Feb council meeting where she said: Councils that declare a climate emergency must commit to strong and fast climate action and reduce their carbon emissions as fast as possible.
Yet sprinkled throughout this report we find statement after statement that debunks this ‘urgency’ and plays the cost card. For example: Increasing the Solar Savers program where council purchases the system and residents therefore have no up-front costs, we are told: This scheme will have a financial impact on Council’s budget as Council will need to fund the upfront cost for each household in the program.
And this approach goes on and on –
Committing to goals and initiatives in Options 1 and 2 will require significant additional staff resources and operating budget to fund new activities to reduce corporate and community carbon emissions.
Current operating and capital budgets do not include an allowance for activities that will need to be undertaken if Council determines to declare a climate emergency
No provision has been made in Council’s long term SRP for the substantial costs of the initiatives in Options 1 and 2. If these initiatives are included, Council would need to consider re-prioritisation of other projects to ensure long term financial sustainability of the SRP.
How ludicrous that within the same agenda we have the proposed 2020/21 budget and another item that would impact greatly on this budget but has not even been investigated and quantified. Surely the vote on any Climate Emergency declaration and its accompanying actions should precede any vote on the budget? Unless of course the objective is not to introduce anything new at this point in time and continue with the goal of achieving so very little by 2030 or 2050. A charade at its best we say!
Much of the report focuses on council’s ‘achievements’ in this domain of climate change. One such ‘achievement’ is touted as the annual planting of 2000 trees to combat the heat island effect. What we are not told of course is that according to the 2018/19 annual report 940 trees were lost (page 13). Seen from this angle, 2000 plantings become 1000! And we are still waiting of course for an ESD policy, a WSUD policy into the planning scheme and that old perennial of tree controls over private land (ie tree register). Oh, and an Urban Forest in the Booran Road park that remains under lock and key but is still counted as ‘open space’!
Finally, here is a list of Victorian councils that have declared a Climate Emergency (up to Feb 2020). Many of the accompanying proposed actions in these policies put Glen Eira to shame.
Ballarat City Council
Banyule City Council
Bass Coast Shire Council
Bayside City Council
Brimbank City Council
Cardinia City Council
Darebin City Council
Frankston City Council
Greater Dandenong City Council
Hepburn Shire Council
Hobsons Bay City Council
ndigo Shire Council
Kingston City Council
Manningham City Council
Maribyrnong City Council
Melbourne City Council
Moonee Valley City Council
Mount Alexander Shire Council
Moreland City Council
Mornington Peninsula Shire Council
Moyne Shire Council
Port Phillip City Council
Queenscliffe Borough
Surf Coast Shire Council
Warrnambool City Council
Yarra City Council
Yarra Ranges Council
As stated at the outset, we are not debating the issue of climate change and how council should address the challenges. We are far more concerned with how decisions can be authentic and valid when the requisite information is not provided, and budgets are to be decided that don’t include any possibility of funding real action in the immediate future. If this is the objective, then let’s see that declared instead of the continued camouflaging that is council’s modus operandi.
May 3, 2020 at 8:53 PM
Over 60 pages of the Agenda devoted to dog control, and a bit over 10 on climate action.
This says it all.
May 4, 2020 at 9:43 AM
Blind Freddy knows where this is heading. Nothing will change. Things will be put off and they will say we can’t afford all this now. Better still it’s not our job but the feds and state so let them do something. I’m betting that either it won’t get enough votes to pass or they will go for the third option that does nothing.
May 4, 2020 at 10:02 AM
Recommendations are contradictory. If by some miracle councillors vote for option 1 then part 6 does not allow for immediate action. Another report is proposed some time in 2021/2. Smoke and mirrors like always.
May 4, 2020 at 10:39 AM
Tuesday nights vote will flush out the “climate change deniers” masquerading
as concerned councillors. I’m suspect that will be all the Liberal affiliated right wingers towing the fossil fuel loving party line.
A bunch of mindless creeps who think their political connections and wealth will protect them for any looming effects climate change will throw their way.
May 6, 2020 at 10:06 AM
5.2 ACTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE Achieve carbon neutrality for corporate and community carbon emissions as soon as possible, passed through at last nights Special Council meeting. Hyam and Silvers are the climate change deniers on the bunch, ironically they both went to great lengths to deny they weren’t.
We will now have to wait and see how long “as soon as possible” is