Tomorrow night, council is holding a ‘symposium’ on the proposed housing strategy. The speakers are:
Bernard Salt (demographer)
Lester Townsend (Planning Panels Victoria)
Kate Breen (Affordable Development Outcomes)
Maria Yanez (Nightingale Housing)
Whilst these four individuals are undoubtedly ‘experts’ in their respective fields, we need to consider why these people have been chosen by council and exactly how much they know about Glen Eira and its current housing needs, its zones, its development rate, its lack of strategic vision! It’s all very well to look at the ‘big picture’ across the state, but housing strategies are meant to be ‘individualised’ and pertain to unique municipalities. We are therefore very sceptical as to the value of tomorrow night’s symposium and how well it will address the fundamental issues facing Glen Eira. Yes, what is happening statewide and nationally is important, but even more important is what is and what has been happening in Glen Eira.
Even more disconcerting are the following statements (cited verbatim) all taken from this link – (https://www.haveyoursaygleneira.com.au/our-housing-our-future/widgets/344509/faqs#80192)
The event is the opener for our early community engagement phase which will continue to the end of August. A second phase of consultation will take place in early 2022 on the content of a draft housing strategy.
Council has stated that the Housing Strategy will be completed in April 2022. Does the above paragraph then imply that the ‘second phase of consultation’ will simply be on what council produces as its one and only draft strategy? Why the huge gap of 6 months before any further ‘consultation’ takes place?
This might have been kosher if the survey and the issues paper were up to scratch. They are not. Once again we find that detail is lacking, pertinent questions and options are lacking, and residents are asked nothing more than irrelevant Dorothy Dix Questions, that add nothing to a full understanding of Glen Eira’s future and the role council needs to play.
Finally, we have this other quote:
As the purpose of the event is to explore information about demographics and housing rather than specifically about the current housing strategy project, Councillors and Council officers will not be answering questions on the night. Drop-in sessions on 22 and 26 July are planned and will be an opportunity for the community to discuss the themes of the housing strategy discussion paper and the housing stragegy (sic) project with Council officers.
Why then hold such a forum if it does not relate specifically to our local housing strategy? Why deny residents the opportunity to ask questions of officers and councillors? How much has this public relations exercise cost?
In the coming days we will analyse the survey and reveal why it is nothing more than another bogus exercise in so-called ‘ consultation!
PS: In 2019 Stonnington Council also held a symposium for its revamped housing strategy. They did include speakers from Planning Panels and Nightingale just like Glen Eira is doing. However, they also had someone from Profile.id – a company that Glen Eira and most other councils in the state rely on for their ‘individualised’ information. This presentation focused exclusively on Stonnington – its population growth, its development rate, its age structure, etc. See the presentation via this link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1odRg-PHd-pmfAGCJ_oN44sI5rJkJR5oN/view. In Glen Eira such information is deemed unnecessary it would appear!
July 13, 2021 at 12:30 PM
Just another sham, shame on Council.
July 13, 2021 at 12:58 PM
I don’t give a stuff about what is happening elsewhere. All I know is we are being overdeveloped and council is doing bugger all about trying to stop it and preserve our amenity. We already know that at least another 5000 doggy boxes are coming and this lot still want more.
July 13, 2021 at 2:40 PM
In 2017 council produced a document which showed that there is enough land capacity to cope with the projected housing growth. Ignoring their own consultant’s research, they then went on to make Carnegie suitable for 12 instead of 7 preferred storeys and Bentleigh went from 4 to 5 storeys in some places in 2018. We then got Amendment C184 that turned mandatory into preferred. And all the time waiting in the wings we’ve got the East Village debacle and the Caulfield Village shame. There’s also waiting the Caulfield Station structure plan and the Glen Huntly structure plan with I’ll bet plenty of scope for more high rise and loss of heritage in Derby Road. Mind you none of this takes into account the covid impacts and people preferring to work from home. This latest consultation continues merrily along the well worn path that council has trodden for decades. Keep residents dumb and never reveal what you are going to impose on them.
July 13, 2021 at 3:32 PM
The coming developments at the Caulfield Racecourse will add thousands more resident into Glen Eira more than enough to meet any future targets.
Informed residents is a danger to the CEO position and she knows it.
July 13, 2021 at 4:10 PM
Why does council think they can punch above their own weight, viz lay down rules for housing development. The village idiot knows that these decisions are made by State Govt Richard Wynne and Co and VCAT. Until council can get consistent planning approvals they will be irrelevant in Planning mandates; yet they spend money pontificating and simply waste rate payers money on a project that is overruled a lot of the time by the higher ups in the food chain. Councillors are guilty of this crime as they refuse to bring Council workers to sick to their original job description of Garbage/road/paths and parks, the council established rules for what is possible. Stop wasting everyone’s time. It just like ALL the State Premiers wanting to be Prime Minster for a few minutes on TV.
July 13, 2021 at 4:20 PM
A waste of time again! We have been on the strategic structure planning merry go round with this lot since 2017. I will be attending tomorrow. I would much prefer to hear what Council is now planning re development/ height limits, social housing & affordable housing in our suburb. Why not have an opportunity to ask a question. It is the resident once again not listened to and treated with disdain.
Thanks Tony for another great blog. You do a great job keeping us informed.
September 24, 2021 at 4:26 PM
+100 Rose. An excellent, informative blog. An under rated community resource.
July 13, 2021 at 5:40 PM
Sadly, carnegie’s residents voted in the same old, same old counselled so the same old, same old, continues to happen. More useless discussions, meetings, plans made, only to be scrapped and reformed after more sham discussions. All the while the developers rub their hands with glee. Once all our heritage buildings and lovely amenity is lost and their is no more open space or large homes left to ‘develop’, they will finally decide on a shiny new plan for all, stacks of boxes for more council rates.
July 13, 2021 at 5:59 PM
You are so right. Five years on and we have nothing to show for all the plans except more and more development that is destroying our suburbs. Nothing is permanent. No structure plans, no increased levies for open space and developer contributions, no decent tree register and nothing about parking. It is a complete joke how useless this council and its administration is.
July 13, 2021 at 9:45 PM
Create chaos and rule, they know it works.
July 15, 2021 at 8:58 AM
I couldn’t motivate myself to yet another session designed to push residents to accept what Council has already decided it wants. Remember we still have the structure plans that they adopted for Carnegie, Bentleigh, Elsternwick. I tried to get answers about the rationale for key aspects of them and failed–Council’s record-keeping was so poor they didn’t know who was responsible for what appeared in its own documents. The Minister outlined that a municipality-wide housing strategy was required over 2 years ago–now it looks like taking yet another year before we have one. Why did Council try ram C184 down our throats without it?