Readers should find the following cut and paste from the council website both laughable and illuminating. Laughable, because this is an example of the emptiness of all council promises. Illuminating since it illustrates again and again that what goes into the public domain is nothing more than an exercise in public relations spin. In Glen Eira, the chasm between words and actions would challenge the Grand Canyon!
We quote verbatim from the second half of the webpage found here: https://www.gleneira.vic.gov.au/services/planning-and-building/planning-scheme-and-amendments/glen-eira-planning-scheme-review-2018
During this wide ranging program of consultation a number of issues and opportunities were raised which have been grouped into themes below. These issues and opportunities are generally the same as those identified in the 2016 Review. Our ongoing engagement with the community has reinforced initial community feedback rather than revealed anything new. In light of this, it was not considered necessary to consult the community again for the specific purpose of this 2018 Review.
Work plan
The work plan adopted by Council includes projects that will cover:
- Loss of neighbourhood character, more specifically:
- The need for additional design guidelines within zones
- More landscaping opportunities and vegetation
- Better transition between developments
- Curb the rate of growth
- Reduce basement encroachments
- Improve garden character
- Protect backyards
- Reduce hard surfaces in private open space areas
- Front fencing
- Streetscape integration
- Better quality architecture
- Greater front setbacks
- Reduce building heights
- Overdevelopment in Activity Centres
- Development transition between zones
- Protection of heritage
- Traffic and parking
- Lack of open space
- Developer contribution to infrastructure
- MSS and Local Policy framework
- Loss of trees
- Environmentally Sustainable Design
The Planning Scheme Review report and work plan has been submitted to the Minister for Planning, with work commencing immediately.
COMMENTS
The above quotes relate to the 2018 so called Review Of the Planning Scheme which, as stated, did not involve any community consultation. It is now 4 years since the updated work plan from 2016. We were promised another update for this year. We are still waiting. Nor have we heard anything about another Planning Scheme Review which is also required – unless of course, officers have applied for another extension!
But what is particularly frustrating is the stated ‘commitment’ of this council to undertake all of the things so important to residents – ie height controls, tree protection; open space, traffic, etc. We have bolded and underlined all of council’s promises which relate to these issues in the above. So, how is it possible that the current draft Housing Strategy flies in the face of all these promises?
How on earth can you:
- ‘Curb growth’ and at the same time rezone at least 10,699 properties for more development when you already admit to a capacity for 50,000 net new dwellings and only need 13,000 out to 2036?
- ‘improve garden character’ by removing the mandatory garden requirement in over 7000 sites?
- ‘protect backyards’ when rear setbacks are mooted to be removed in GRZ2 and reduced in NRZ?
- ‘reduce hard surfaces’ when you intend to decrease permeability requirements in several zones?
- Have ‘developer contribution’ still absent after 6 years?
What the Housing Strategy proposes is completely at odds with resident views and council promises. Add to this the fact that so little has been achieved in six and a half years and the results are shameful and incompetent.
March 30, 2022 at 12:02 PM
Yup, would be laughing my head off if this weren’t so pathetic. Noone can or should believe a word that comes out of their mouths.
March 30, 2022 at 1:47 PM
Only a suggestion as I appreciate the work this would involve. Would the owners of this site be able to provide some insight into the work accomplished by other councils in this six and a half year period as opposed to what Glen Eira has been able to achieve? I am not interested in adopted council policies but the amendments which have successfully been gazetted into the respective planning schemes. This is the criterion for “success” I believe.