Councillors’ performance tonight in unanimously accepting the East Virginia structure plan signals how little these individuals are willing to stand up for residents and for common sense.
Magee’s grandstanding has become habitual plus lacking all logic when he can begin his statements with –‘I will be speaking against the motion but voting for it’!!!!
Hyams continues with the old arguments that this is only the first step in the process blah, blah, blah and then spending 9 minutes on regurgitating what the documents contain but in a totally uncritical way.
The only ‘news’ that came out of Hyams’ mouth was the naming of the individuals involved in the Community Reference Group – for the very first time. How on earth a COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP can function without anyone knowing who they are is beyond belief. If their role was to represent the community, then it is incumbent upon council to ensure that the wider community knows who these individuals are so that they may be contacted and ideas exchanged. But that is not the way this council functions. No agendas or minutes of these meetings have ever been published. We don’t even know how many meetings occurred. As for the individuals named what is their background? How many are associated with the development industry? How many were tapped on the shoulder and asked to apply? We note, and with no intent to cast aspersions on these individuals, that the vast majority have never asked a public question, have probably never attended a council meeting and certainly are not active on social media. Thus on what basis was this community reference group selected? For all the talk about transparency and accountability the way these Community Reference Groups have been set up and function is anything but transparent and accountable. The $64 question of course remains – how many suggestions made by OUR community reference group saw its way into this final structure plan? We would hazard a guess that very little produced the desired outcomes.
As a further example of council’s failure to address the gaping holes in this structure plan we present one speaker’s question (and statements) to council from this meeting. It is significant we believe that she received not a single word from anyone in response to her comments! So much for ‘public participation’. The only saving grace of tonight’s meeting was that it only lasted about an hour!!!!!!!
October 23, 2018 at 11:03 PM
Who was speaking? I sent a question via the council web page and received a follow up telephone call were I was told there was to be no public participation at this meeting whatsoever. Was this correct?
October 24, 2018 at 9:08 AM
2 residents spoke. There were no public questions.
October 24, 2018 at 10:47 AM
I don’t understand how you can speak against something and then vote for it. The same goes for Hyams when he said he would have like mandatory controls along the edges. If that’s what you want then move an amendment but don’t vote for something that isn’t what you want. I’m sick to death of the way these councillors operate. Everything is for show but the result is predetermined. They are a joke.
October 24, 2018 at 10:52 AM
There is no way the councillors have read the 1500 pages in such short time frame. How can they make a proper decisions?
We are very concern from the proposed Traffic solutions along E.B Road!
Indeed “Another Miserable Performance”.
October 24, 2018 at 5:17 PM
The lady made some great points. They should have been answered. Traffic will be unbearable and 3000 dwellings will add to the chaos that already exists. These councillors don’t have a clue. Either they are totally in developers pockets, plain dumb and lazy or don’t give a stuff about what happens.
October 24, 2018 at 7:21 PM
Against my better judgement I watched last night’s proceedings knowing that it would be nauseating. That it certainly was. I am not placated by the spin of “this is only the first step” in a long drawn out process. It’s been stated many times here, and rightfully so I think, that if you agree to 3000 apartments and a majority of 8 storey buildings to then say “sorry, we got it wrong and think it should be 2000 and 5 or 6 storeys” and hope that this is going to be successful is living in a fool’s paradise. The chances of this happening are zero. Councillors could then have saved us from their embarrassing display last night. When 8 of the 9 councillors get up and have nothing worthwhile to say, or refuse to even address the major drawbacks in the document in a concerted analytical manner, I think that is a dereliction of their duty.
The post is dead accurate in decrying how two councillors can portray themselves as against the drafts and then vote for them. Even Esakoff was a teensy bit perturbed by 8 storeys – but this only got one sentence from her from memory. I resent what all of this says about councillors and their lack of respect for the intelligence of residents.
October 25, 2018 at 9:08 AM
Version 2 and version 3 are almost identical. A year of yakking and little to show for it.
October 25, 2018 at 9:51 AM
…and no real solution for Traffic
October 28, 2018 at 9:41 AM
Tip of the iceberb
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/casey-council-where-riches-are-made-with-the-stroke-of-a-pen-20181027-p50ce6.html