Tonight’s council meeting resembled a three ring circus and revealed once again to what extent decisions are made behind closed doors in Glen Eira. The ‘circus’ involved Item 9.1, on the 14 storey application for Horne Street, Elsternwick..
There was a significant pause before Delahunty put up her hand to move a motion for refusal of the application. This was seconded by Magee. What became obvious was:
- The motion was entirely unexpected by all. Hence no grounds for refusal (as required) were as yet drafted.
- Countless apologies to officers for this ‘surprise’ and not a word of criticism for their recommendation that went beyond the current Design & Development Overlay. Instead, we got comments as to how well they are interpreting the planning scheme.
- Silver admitted his opposition to the application
- Same old arguments from Hyams and Sztrajt such as ‘we could get worse outcome at VCAT’.
- A 5 minute break in proceedings so councilors can again ‘decide’ what to do behind closed doors.
- Magee’s ‘liking’ for 12 storeys, but only if it’s in the ‘right place’. That is along Nepean Highway.
On return, Delahunty’s motion was voted out. Only Delahunty and Magee voted in favour of refusal. All the rest voted against. Please note that Athanasopoulos and Esakoff were absent.
Davey had foreshadowed a new motion for a permit of 8 storeys. It was then decided that the issue would come back for decision once Torres had been given some time to draft the relevant motion and its conditions.
Silver moved motion for 8 storeys. Sztrajt seconded. Voted in 5 votes to 2. Interestingly, Davey who foreshadowed the 8 storey motion, voted against! Magee also voted against. Cade was silent throughout this item.
Please listen to what was said (below) and consider the following:
- Baseless claims by Magee and others that the structure plans were in line with community sentiment. All community feedback was strongly against the 8 to 12 storey heights.
- No justification has ever been provided for such heights
- Traffic and overshadowing documents that were to be done over a year ago are still to make it into the public domain. Has council actually done this work?
- Why does this council continually blame the State Government and yet not one single formal public statement has been made that challenges anything. When other councils such as Boroondara, Mornington Peninsula, Stonnington can voice their disapproval of government decisions, why is our council silent and compliant? This is not advocacy. It is complicity!
Please listen carefully to the incredible waffle that epitomises these councillors decision making!
Finally, we also point out that in response to the 4 or 5 public questions council did not provide a single answer.
PS: FROM HANSARD 19/3
SOUTHERN METROPOLITAN REGION Mr HAYES(Southern Metropolitan) (18:01):My constituency question is to the Minister for Planning. I refer the minister to the case of my constituent Graham Huntly, who is helping the government meet its renewable energy target by putting solar panels on his home at Ross Street, Elsternwick. If Woolworths succeeds in building 10 and 14-storey towers in Elsternwick, Mr Huntly’s sunlight will be blocked and his solar panel investment—to say nothing of his quality of life—will be devalued.
What rules does the government have in place to stop developments overshadowing solar panels, and will the minister support Glen Eira council’s eight-storey height controls—and make them mandatory—and reject 10 and 14-storey towers in Elsternwick?
March 20, 2019 at 8:34 AM
Thanks for the summary. One thing you omitted about the 7-15 Horne St discussion: Cr Delahunty curiously asked a question “to the mood of the room” (i.e. the public gallery) about which was preferable, acceptance of 8 storeys or outright refusal. More people raised their hands to favour outright rejection.
March 20, 2019 at 9:29 AM
Bottom of the barrel stuff by Delahunty. Resorting to theatrics instead of planning. Had she and the others read the countless feedback from ratepayers and acknowledged and acted on it we wouldn’t be in this mess now. Playing to the gallery is nothing short of hypocritical and obscene. That goes for them all.
March 20, 2019 at 11:29 AM
Listened to the crap and Strajt saying that that 8 stories has to go somewhere made me want to throw up. Who says 8 stories is okay and how about the reasons for this? They’re great at plucking figures from their backsides and treating it like its fact and the truth. Stop the crap and start working for the people who pay you.
March 20, 2019 at 12:37 PM
I find this confusing. Doesn’t seem like they complied with their own Local Law covering meeting procedure. In the end, did Council have a set of conditions to accompany the motion to grant a permit, which they subsequently voted 5-2 for? 8 storeys is almost irrelevant, what really matters is the height, conventionally expressed using AHD…so what height limit did Council place on the development when dramatically redesigning the building?
March 20, 2019 at 3:28 PM
How many times have we heard them say that they cant redesign an application. 6 levels is a hell of a redesign.Bet if no one was in the gallery then 12 levels would have got the nod
March 20, 2019 at 8:02 PM
We shouldn’t Elsternwick and Caulfield have the same mandatory heights as Bentleigh 3, 4 and 5 stories.
Why should these suburbs be treated any differently, is it because they have a tram, which actually slows the traffic sometimes to a standstill, or is it POLITICAL?????
March 20, 2019 at 10:41 PM
Political! Staikos was in a marginal seat. That’s the reason.
March 21, 2019 at 1:05 AM
First Glen Eira Council Meeting I’ve attended – I wonder if as much waffle is forthcoming if no-one is in the public gallery? I’d lodged a question about interim height limits – waiting until 2021 is way too late. Apparently they don’t have the time/resources required to make an application to the Minister for Planning. Commercial Zone 1 in Caulfield South