GE Service Performance


The various ‘Records of Assembly’, brief as they are, still contain some fascinating items. One that really caught our eye was – “At conclusion of Assembly of Councillors a Councillor only meeting took place with a Note Taker present.” We simply ask – who was the Notetaker? Was the Notetaker really ‘independent’ as per a contract? How much did this little tete a tete cost ratepayers if the Notetaker was an ‘outsider’ under contract? What was the purpose of this meeting? Could it have anything to do with Newton’s contract?

Then from the same meeting we get this: ‘Cr Penhalluriack – a Court Order to remove a Plane tree in Murrumbeena’. Given that this is a Court Order, rather than a VCAT order, we can only assume that another court case has taken place and that Council has been thumped. So the question again is – how much did this cost ratepayers? Were barristers, QCs or merely a solicitor involved? Did it need to go to court? Could council have averted court proceedings in any shape or form?

Two items that appear under the in camera discussions deserve comment. One relates to another sporting oval resurfacing for ‘more than $350,000’ at Lord Reserve. We wonder what the final cost will actually be? There’s also this tit bit under ‘personnel’ and Occupational Health and Safety Compliance? Again, we can only speculate, but has this anything to do with worker safety at the mulch heap, or possibly another issue altogether? The real question is will ratepayers be footing any bills or payouts on this little number?

Finally, Glen Huntly’s comment deserves taking up. $7.5 million has now been forecast for the ‘development’ of Booran Rd. Reservoir. Given that no plans have as yet surfaced (officially) for this site, then how can any sum be assigned and what is this money for? What are the mega plans that have possibly already been concocted – once again, without community input?

The sign placed at the now defunct mulch heap attempts to lay the blame for the closure of this facility squarely at the feet of councillors. What the sign does not disclose is the reasoning behind councillors’ decision – namely, that it represented a risk to both employees and the public. No matter how remote this risk may have been, councillors acted appropriately – in stark contrast to the audit committee and the CEO in failing to provide the scientific consultant’s report to ALL councillors at the earliest opportunity and initiating action.

In the minutes of 3rd March 1997, a report written by Newton states that it was ‘decided that it would be desirable to have a comprehensive set of written policies on all areas(s) of Council activity’. He goes on to state that “in most cases policy ought to be approved by Council. This would give clear authority to the policy being laid down. It would also require reconsideration by the Council itself if the policy is to be amended (good corporate governance)”.  So, it is Council, who is to set policy, or to change policy. Under the same item, the ‘Occupational Health and Safety Policy’ was voted on. It states:

“Management has a duty to provide and maintain so far as is practicable, a working environment that is safe and without risk to health. All staff have a duty to report and assist management to correct unsafe conditions”.

“…the organisation makes the following commitment – We will not knowingly engage in any activity or provide any service unless we can perform the activity or provide the service safely”.

“This policy recognises that the health and safety of all employees of the City of Glen Eira is the responsibility of Management…..”

One of the tasks and procedures adopted was to ‘Promote proactive risk identification, assessment and control programmes that embrace the principles of effective risk control”.

It should never have taken the persistence of one councillor to get things done. It also should never have been ignored by the Audit Committee, and it should never have had to come to a vote at council meeting. The onus was on management to ensure that the mulch heap was 100% safe. The fact that it was even moved into an area adjacent to a playground, school, and public park is beyond belief. As Mr. Newton stated so many years ago – the blame must be laid at management’s feet!

Melbourne Racing Club: chief executive officer 

Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — My question is to the Minister for Racing. I refer the minister to comments made by Mr Alasdair Robertson, CEO of the Melbourne Racing Club, at a government media event yesterday, including sexist and offensive comments he made comparing members of the media to prostitutes and hit men, and I ask: did the minister condemn these comments at the time and does he believe they appropriately promote the image of racing in Victoria? 

Dr NAPTHINE (Minister for Racing) — I thank the honourable member for her question. As members are aware, racing is an important industry in the state of Victoria. It is a multibillion-dollar industry and provides employment for over 70 000 Victorians. Yesterday I was in the grounds of Parliament House promoting what is going to be a significant event for the racing industry this weekend. I was in the company of representatives of the Arab horse group; representatives of Sheikh Hamdan Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the Deputy Ruler of Dubai and United Arab Emirates Minister for Finance; and representatives of the Ambassador of the United Arab Emirates. We were promoting the inaugural Shadwell Arabian Mile race, on Saturday at Caulfield Racecourse. There was a media event to promote that race, which is an important race because it will be the first time that Arab horses will have raced on Australian racetracks under the Australian rules of racing. It is an important issue. 

At that conference questions were raised with me about not only that event but also other matters to do with racing. Subsequently there were issues raised about some comments made at that event. I can assure the house that I did not hear the comments made at that event. I was not aware of them in any way, shape or form.

Ms Allan interjected.

The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Bendigo East!

Dr NAPTHINE — Just take your time.

Honourable members interjecting.

The SPEAKER — Order! The minister was giving a serious answer to a serious question. I ask members of the opposition and members of the government to refrain from interjecting. 

Dr NAPTHINE — I was advised this morning that the Melbourne Racing Club official who made these comments has apologised for what he described as his stupid and inappropriate comments. An article that appeared online at http://www.smh.com.au at 12.43 p.m. on 7 April reports: ‘In the heat of the moment I made a stupid comment and I’ve actually openly apologised for it this morning’, Mr Robertson told radio 3AW. 

Of course I do not agree with those comments. Indeed I believe those comments were totally inappropriate and totally wrong and should be condemned. There is no place for those sorts of comments in racing in Victoria. Anybody who suggests that the racing industry of Victoria is at all sexist is absolutely wrong. People of both genders have served the racing industry well in Victoria and across Australia at all levels, whether as jockeys, as trainers or as officials. Males and females have served the racing industry well.

It was an inappropriate comment for which the person responsible has apologised. I did not hear the comments at the time, and I condemn them, but I say at the same time that this should not distract in any way, shape or form from what will be a great event on Saturday — the Shadwell Arabian Mile. It is the first time we will have Arabian horses racing on a Victorian racetrack. It is absolutely vital and important for the future of this state.

Honourable members interjecting.

 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 The following address highlights again the difference between Glen Eira and other councils. Readers should remember that Lipshutz was against the introduction of an alcohol free zone in Bentleigh, since it would necessitate more staff for the currently already overworked 1000 staff, and in his view, the police were against it! 

City of Kingston: alcohol-free zones  

Mr LIM (Clayton) — I rise to congratulate the City of Kingston for introducing alcohol-free zones. As a progressive city, Kingston has always been at the forefront of introducing and maintaining safety measures to provide a secure environment for its residents to live, shop and socialise. The recent introduction of two alcohol-free zones in Clayton South and Clarinda, in the electorate of Clayton, is testament to the determination of the City of Kingston to improve its family-friendly and kid-friendly culture, as well as its residents’ sense of security. 

There has been a growing trend of binge drinking in general, as well as people drinking outside their local bottle shops. Local businesses and community groups have long supported the establishment of alcohol-free zones to address irresponsible drinking behaviour. Residents and beach users in Kingston have also submitted petitions to the council, calling for the further restriction of alcohol consumption. The City of Kingston’s decision to introduce alcohol-free zones means that consumption of alcohol will be prohibited in designated blocks. Consumption of alcohol will be regulated and controlled in those public places. I have confidence that this policy will play a crucial role in curbing the unhealthy trend of binge drinking and related antisocial behaviour. More importantly, this policy will help make local residents feel more secure and make Kingston a great place to live, work and raise a family.

How good is Glen Eira at running commercial enterprises? How good are their business plans? How good is their homework? How comprehensive is their analyses of current commercial climates and how good are they in estimating where a dollar could be made? Looking at history, we have to conclude that their track record on commercial endeavours is exceedingly poor. GESAC is starting to sound like it might be the latest white elephant.

Most landlords (and that’s what council is when we consider GESAC) will have ironclad contracts in place. They simply hire out space and it is up to the tenant to outfit the place, provide staff, and do whatever is necessary to make a buck. The owner is simply there to ensure that everything is safe and above board.

GESAC has been calling for ‘expressions of interest’ for potential tenants for several months. The propaganda machine has been in full swing. We’re told that everything is on budget, that 5 zillion tons of concrete have been laid, etc.etc. What we haven’t been told is how many commercial operators have actually shown any interest whatsoever? And of those that might have applied, how many have been deemed as ‘suitable’? This Saturday’s Age Tender advertisement has given us further cause to doubt the business acumen of Glen Eira. Here’s the ad –

“Reference No.: 2011.034
Provision of Gymnasium Equipment to Glen Eira Sports and Aquatic Centre

Requirement: Provision of a suite of gymnasium fitness equipment including installation, ongoing maintenance and centre staff training.”

One very feasible conclusion that could be drawn from this ad, is –

  • There has not been any expressions of interest (or at least not considered viable)
  • If, as a last resort, council is contemplating ‘managing’ this itself, then what’s the cost?
  • Does this mean that instead of rent coming in, council will be forking out to guarantee that all premises are occupied?
  • Where will this added ‘cost’ be itemised in budget figures, and will the final figures really reveal the truth? Will we still be told that the ‘cost’ is $41.2 million?
  • How well did the ‘business plan’ foresee the possibility of commercial disinterest?
  • How many actual ‘expessions of interest’ have there been overall? Are we dealing with something that will end up costing the community millions and millions simply because planning, strategising, and other considerations are proving to be inaccurate? Who should take the blame for this?

The bottom line is clear. Organisations only go to tender, and pay for services themselves, when they have to – that is, when no-one is interested! Of course we could be wrong in all of the above, as so many Anonymous responses tell us. So, what’s everyone elses take on that tender advertisement?

Forgive the levity of this post, but we thought we might have some fun with our legal eagle councillors and all of those working in compliance, corporate counsel, and so on. We could even be talking 50 well paid staff and councillors. So, how come they can’t get a simple thing like one sentence correct? 

We cite the opening sentence from Section 4.8.2 of the Councillor Code of Conduct which reads

“Councillors’ decisions are made in Statutory Council Meetings”. 

In the first place, councillors DO NOT MAKE DECISIONS – only Council does that! In the second place, the only decisions made at ‘statutory’ meetings are the election of the Mayor, and possibly membership/delegations on committees. Ordinary council meetings are not ‘statutory’ meetings – they are simply Council Meetings! but we guess the use of such language is imposing, impressive, obfuscating, and in the end just plain wrong! And we didn’t go to law school either.

At council meeting on Tuesday night, under ‘Councillor Questions’ Penhalluriack asked Newton a question related to the Glenhuntly mulch storage facility. In a long preamble to the actual question Penhalluriack outlined the following:

  • Newton prides himself on correct ‘risk management’ procedures & policies.
  • Scientific Consultants were called in to evaluate the public health risk at the Glen Huntly depot
  • Part of their findings was that legionella ‘and fungi’ were presenting some risk to workers and the general public
  • Several recommendations were made to reduce the risk – ie sprinklers, training, protective gloves/clothing, the importance of washing hands and signage alerting the public

The question asked of Newton had several parts:

  • Why did Council ‘twice deny that there was any danger to the community’s health’ when he had twice asked about it
  • Why did he have to go to the Audit committee and raise the question for a third time before anything was done?
  • ‘why hasn’t (the report) been circulated to councillors?’
  • Were areas ‘adjacent to the mulch bin’ also analysed such as the school, playground, car park areas?
  • Penhalluriack also sought an explanation as to why it appears that none of the recommendations of the report have been carried out?

Newton took the question on Notice

COMMENTS:  Penhalluriack’s question makes it abundantly clear that information within this Council is ‘filtered’ and that only a select few are privy to information that could have major repercussions on the entire community and council’s liability. We remind readers of the composition of the audit committee (especially Lipshutz). If the audit committee did have this information, then why wasn’t it distributed to all councillors according to best practice and council’s audit committee charter? Why does it take a councillor 3 requests before any response is forthcoming? Why does it take months and months for any remediation of what might potentially be a public health risk? And the most important question: Why the cover up?

Passing the buck  

I REFER to your front page article (‘‘Drain blame game’’, Leader, March 2). I live in Grange Rd, Carnegie, and have raised this issue with the council and I got a letter back saying the issue was being investigated. I was not given a timeline as to when I would be given the council’s findings, or what they intended to do about it. It appears to me Glen Eira Council and Melbourne Water will both play the pass the buck on this subject. Grange Rd has no drains on the side I live on. But who is responsible for this – council or Melbourne Water? 

Cramming has to stop  

GLENHUNTLY Rd is already overcrowded with cars (‘‘Still no to Coles plan’’, Leader, March 1). The trams are also overcrowded. We cannot keep on with this endless cramming in of more people. It is wrecking the whole character of the area as well.  

Time to Wake Up 

THIS sort of excessive development should never be allowed (‘‘Still no to Coles plan’’, Leader, March 1). Wake up, council and State Government, we don’t want this!

David a great MP  

DAVID Southwick was out there when flooding hit Caulfield, clearing drains for flooded-out residents and helping locals to get other essential assistance (‘‘Big pride, little policy’’, Leader, February 22). This is typical of David: when someone needs help, he pitches in to make things better. Many throughout the community already know about his generous spirit and ability to cut through the static and get things moving. That is why so many local people backed him so enthusiastically when he first ran for office in 2004, and why they have stuck with him ever since. He will be a great member for Caulfield.

A media release from Andrew Robb, MP

Defence against disaster in Glen Eira

04-March-2009

Goldstein Media Releases, Environment, Funding

Glen Eira City Council has been allocated $40,000 to undertake a stormwater flood mitigation study as a part of the Government’s Natural Disaster Mitigation Program.

“The Glen Eira study aims to accurately assess the level of flood risk across the municipality, identify priority flood protection works and incorporate land use and development overlay controls into Glen Eira City Council’s planning Scheme.

“Competition for these funds is fierce, and I congratulate the Council on its successful application,” Andrew Robb, Federal Member for Goldstein, said.

For more information about the Natural Disaster Mitigation Program visit the Emergency Management Australia website:
http://www.ema.gov.au/agd/ema/emainternet.nsf/Page/Communities_Natural_Disasters_Australian_Government_Assistance_for_Natural_Disasters

Media contact: Skye Buttenshaw, 9557 4644

QUESTIONS:

1. Where is the report?

2. What were the outcomes/actions resulting from this report?

3. What if any changes were made to the Planning Scheme as a result of this study?

4. What has eventuated as a result of the other grant listed – ie. 2006: $50,000 for Natural Disaster Mitigation Programme – stormwater disaster risk management

5. $90,000 grants in the past 5 years for Storm Water mitigation/risk management – what has this council learnt that could have prevented the Feb 4th floods? – or is this simply a case of $90,000 down the drain?!!!!

There’s a new Media Release  put out by Council which states: 

“Glen Eira City Council is pleased to report that all children have been offered a place (for 4 year old kindergarten) — including the nine children who have decided to remain on the waiting list for their first preference. Glen Eira Mayor Cr Margaret Esakoff said 736 places have been accepted.”

If true, then this is indeed fantastic. However, there are a few points that are not made clear and which perhaps cast some doubt on the veracity of the above claim.

As late as June 2010, the Age carried this paragraph in its story of kindergarten shortages: “Glen Eira mayor Steven Tang said 285 four-year-olds would miss out on a kindergarten place if no further funding were provided. In order to provide the 15 hours, Glen Eira would need $4 million to build six new kindergartens and replace another facility.”

The Caulfield Leader (18th May, 2010) also said – “Mayor Steven Tang said there were fears three-year-old kindergarten places would also be cut.” And “Murrumbeena Kindergarten teacher Michelle Ball said parents and teachers were concerned the extended hours could sacrifice three-year-old kinder children”.

From Council’s own commissioned report  ‘Universal Access’ there is the following paragraph:

“The clear view of the Glen Eira community is that implementation of 15 hours universal access should not be at the expense of the current service system (particularly three year-old kindergarten) and additional kindergarten facilities should be built to meet this new Council of Australian Governments (COAG) policy requirement. Three-year-old
kindergarten is seen as important in Glen Eira, and is in high demand. Many of the kindergartens that offer three-year-old kindergarten programs report extensive waiting lists. Any reduction in the overall availability of three-year-old programs in future would exacerbate already excessive demand.”

We therefore ask:

  • How has Council achieved such a remarkable turnaround in the space of 6 months?
  • What has happened to 3 year old kindergarten places? Have these been ‘sacrificed’ in order to fill 4 year old places?
  • What other cost cutting has taken place in this ‘achievement’?
  • Is the Media Release merely another example of not telling the whole story?

Council slashes funds

A lobby group finds finance for childcare centres has been cut by $400,000

 FREEDOM of Information documents obtained by a childcare lobby group show Glen Eira Council has been stripping funding from childcare centres since 2006.

Save Local Childcare Coalition spokeswoman Bronwyn Burton said the documents show ‘‘the council has slashed a $500,000 investment in 2006/07 to $95,000 in 2009/10’’.

A petition to save the Elsternwick Children’s Centre will be handed to the council this month.

More than 900 residents and traders have signed the petition after the council announced the closure of the Kooyong Rd centre in May. The building’s owner, Alfred Health, said it could not extend the centre’s lease beyond December. The council, which has ruled out buying the building or finding a replacement, voted in October to lobby the State Government to ensure land continued to be used for child care.

In a letter sent this month, Glen Eira Mayor Margaret Esakoff reiterated the council’s interests to Alfred Health. Alfred Health chief executive Andrew Way said the board of directors was ‘‘cognisant of the problems caused by the uncertainty’’ around the centre. ‘‘The board of directors has asked me to explore with the Victorian Department of Health ways in which this uncertainty can be overcome more quickly than the currently anticipated timescale of June/July,’’ he said.

 COMMENT: Our new members of Parliament should take careful note of this report. Glen Eira’s tactics have always been to ‘pass the buck’ onto State and Federal Governments or taking the Clayton’s approach of ‘action’ such as ‘advocating’ and ‘making representations’ to authorities.  Perhaps if State and Federal funding to Council was also cut by $500,000 then the blame game would stop and Council would be forced to budget appropriately and responsibly.

+++++++++++++++

Drain blame game  

Climate changes after flow map revealed 

GLEN Eira Council has slammed Melbourne Water’s drainage system and defended its response to flash floods which wreaked havoc across the city. Mayor Margaret Esakoff has called for a r eport into the February 4 event, and is seeking ‘‘urgent attention’’ from the water authority and the Government to improve main drains to reduce repeated flooding. 

The report will cover damage to Glen Eira properties, response times, Melbourne Water and the council’s drainage maintenance programs and Melbourne Water’s plans to reduce flooding in riskprone areas. It follows nearly a decade of council lobbying after Melbourne Water released a map of areas which would experience ‘‘overland flows’’ during intense rainfall because the capacity of the drains would be exceeded. 

‘‘The flooding of housing and businesses which occurred on February 4 closely matched this map,’’ a council report said. More than 100 Glen Eira homes were significantly affected. Cr Michael Lipshutz said Melbourne Water needed to ‘‘get its act together’’. ‘‘We are seeing climate change and we’re seeing more flooding in our areas,’’ Cr Lipshutz said. 

Cr Esakoff had admitted that the council had not adequately responded after outraged residents slammed its ‘ ‘ slow and uncoordinated’’ reaction. But at last week’s council meeting, she did a backflip, saying: ‘ ‘ Since then, information reviewed showed that this was not the case. The council was not slow to respond’’. But Melbourne Water floodplain manager Phillip Neville said Melbourne’s drainage system ‘‘does a great job’’. ‘‘We saw in excess of a one-in-500year storm in some parts of Melbourne,’’ Mr Neville said. ‘‘ An event of that magnitude would stretch the capacity of any drainage system.’’ 

THOUGH authorities have touted the recent flood as a ‘‘one-in-500-year storm’’, Glen Eira residents will tell you otherwise. Downpours cause repeated flooding in parts of the municipality, including the underpass on Normanby Rd near Caulfield racecourse and Boyd park in Murrumbeena.

Councillor Michael Lipshutz said his neighbours had been flooded four times in 12 months while Cr Jim Magee’s Bentleigh street has been flooded twice.  

In 2000 Melbourne Water, responsible for nine drainage systems in Glen Eira, released a map identifying areas expected to flood because the capacity of drains would be exceeded. Those areas include streets west of Orrong Rd in Ripponlea, streets either side of Hawthorn Rd south of Glenhuntly Rd, between Glenhuntly and Koornang roads in Carnegie, and between Murrumbeena and Poath roads in Murrumbeena. Melbourne Water floodplain manager Phillip Neville said when new properties were built, ‘‘ they’re built to a standard which would lessen the consequences if flooding does occur’’

COMMENT: We repeat our previous questions. How much of the flooding is a result of lack of maintenance of COUNCIL’S DRAINS and not Melbourne Water’s? How much of the flooding could have been avoided? Will Council produce a map of the drains under its responsibility? And if Council performed so ‘adequately’, then surely it can’t be mere coincidence that in the Tender Section of Saturday’s Age newspaper we find this advertisement: “Contract No.: 2011.014 Provision of Reactive Drain and Pit Cleaning Services

Requirement: Provision of stormwater drain/pit cleaning, jetting and root cutting services using a purpose built combination vehicle to supplement Council’s own service. Three year contract with an option on the part of Council to extend for a further period of two years”.

 +++++++++++++

Letters to the Editor

Take public open land discussion seriously  

GLEN Eira Council (councillors and administration) should be publicly pilloried for their appalling response to the Victorian Environment Assessment Council discussion paper on public open land. 

Glen Eira, which has the least public open space in Melbourne and numerous highly paid executives, should have been able to put together a detailed submission that was more than a hastily written onepage letter that lacked substance. Neighbouring councils and individual residents prepared detailed submissions – why didn’t Glen Eira Council?

 

« Previous Page — Next Page »