Once again all our previous records have been absolutely obliterated. Our monthly record now stands at 15,903 (and this is with one less day than the previous month). Our weekly record has also gone through the roof, as well as our daily figures – 1023 hits in a 24 hour period. We also welcome another 14 new subscribers to the site. We are incredibly chuffed with these results and thank all our readers.
Since we’ve been online for 1 year and 2 days, we thought it was time for a ‘retrospective’ – to pinpoint the issues that appear to have generated the most discussion, greatest concern or interest for residents. Without a doubt, GOVERNANCE, in all its guises, was the top issue. We’ve had another Municipal Inspector’s investigation (whitewash?) which queried various practices of councillors; there was a focus (again) on Newton and his shortened reappointment; as well as various conflict of interest matters. Then there was the resignation of Whiteside and her allegations of poor governance on the part of certain councillors. None of this has really been resolved as far as we’re concerned. Good governance, transparency, accountability, and openness are still in short supply at Glen Eira.
Planning, whether this be individual applications, or Planning Scheme reviews, are also strong contenders for ‘issue of the year’. It is however extremely gratifying to find that council meetings are no longer empty echo chambers, but now often filled with placard waving objectors who have taken the trouble to organise themselves and to fight what they believe to be poor planning policy and even worse decisions. In this way, decision makers are held accountable. But we believe much more needs to be done, and this leads onto the third and probably most important issue that faces the community – consultation, or the lack thereof.
For the past decade, any semblance of genuine community consultation has been eroded and stripped away via tiny ‘adjustments’ to the Local Law Meeting Procedures and policies which go through the pretext of consultation, but which, we suspect, have the outcomes preordained. Real engagement, consultation and ultimately empowerment of residents is non existent. Whatever spin administrators and certain councillors insist on trotting out, nothing can hide the reality that residents’ views are largely ignored, or worse, not even sought.
So everything seems to boil down to a corporate culture that is aided and abetted by processes that only pay lip service to the tenets of open and transparent government. The success of this site is clear evidence that many, and an ever growing growing number of residents generally agree with us and welcome a forum that enables them to express their views.
A sincere ‘thank you’ for all your well wishes and support.