From Elizabeth Miller’s Facebook page – https://www.facebook.com/ElizabethMillerBentleigh
Source: http://karl-gillon.me/
PS: The latest spruiking!
August 14, 2015
From Elizabeth Miller’s Facebook page – https://www.facebook.com/ElizabethMillerBentleigh
Source: http://karl-gillon.me/
PS: The latest spruiking!
August 10, 2015
McKinnon Road, McKinnon, level crossing
Ms CROZIER (Southern Metropolitan)—My adjournment matter this evening is for the Minister for Roads and Road Safety, who is responsible for the removal of level crossings. A constituent of mine in the Assembly electorate of Bentleigh has a business close to the McKinnon Road level crossing in McKinnon, which is one of the level crossings highlighted for removal by the government. My constituent is a landlord and one of her tenants spoke to her about being approached by government authorities about the public acquisition of the land on which their business stands. As members will imagine, this has caused great concern to both the landlord and the tenant because it was the first time they had heard that that land was going to be targeted. My constituent attended the public meeting held last week in Bentleigh, and the public acquisition of land was also news to some people at that meeting.
The uncertainty has caused great concern amongst a number of businesses around the level crossing that is slated for removal. What has made it even more confusing is that the information given suggests that people should approach the local council for advice and guidance, yet the local council also seems confused. It does not seem to have anyone who knows much about it and so far it has not appointed anyone to undertake that work. As members will appreciate, there is much consternation amongst the community. The action I seek from the minister is that he provide clarification as to where people should go to seek advice or guidance about the future impacts land acquisition may have on business owners and operators, landlords and tenants.
There needs to be a clear direction about the intention of the public land acquisition, and clearly my constituents in Bentleigh need to have their fears and concerns allayed.
Mr PULFORD …..Ms Crozier raised a matter for the Minister for Roads and Road Safety, but I suggest that perhaps the Minister for Public Transport is the lead minister on the level crossings project.
Ms Crozier—I was not sure if it was Minister Donnellan or Minister Allan.
Ms PULFORD—The removal of the level crossings and a project of this scale does have intersections with road issues, and Ms Crozier’s issue was particularly around land acquisition, which would naturally sit with another minister. I suggest that if Ms Crozier is happy, I will refer that to the Minister for Public Transport as the lead minister on the level crossings removal project. I will seek a response for her.
+++++++++++
SOUTHWICK & STAIKOS
Level crossings
Mr STAIKOS (Bentleigh)—The Andrews Labor government is getting on with the job of removing level crossings in the Bentleigh electorate. In just eight months we have established the Level Crossing Removal Authority, allocated the funds in the budget, signed the contracts and completed early works. Full construction begins later this year.
Consultation is key to the successful delivery of these projects, and I was pleased that last week 500 local residents packed the McKinnon Secondary College hall to hear from the Level Crossing Removal Authority and give their feedback. After four long, dark, wasted years, the Andrews government is removing level crossings at Centre Road, McKinnon Road and North Road. Local residents are delighted by this and very much appreciated the opportunity to participate in the consultation last week. The only people unhappy about this consultation are those opposite. Several members of the opposition got a bit hot under the collar about this meeting and are highly critical of community consultation. The member for Caulfield, who is in the chamber, has been one of the most vocal opponents of consultation on level crossing removal works. I am not surprised by this, given the strange place the member finds himself in.
The member for Caulfield recently held a meeting in protest against the Matthew Guy residential zones. The flyer for the meeting opened with, ‘Do you have concerns about local overdevelopment, such as Port Phillip or questions about planning laws?’. It might as well have read: ‘Come and tell us how bad we were in government’. We know how bad they were—that’s why they are on that side of the house.
Mr SOUTHWICK (Caulfield)—I call on the Premier to discipline the member for Bentleigh over his disgraceful behaviour in advertising a level crossing removal information session using government funds to promote himself and his cause. I particularly question where the email addresses of constituents in Bentleigh will end up. Will they receive Labor Party information?
These level crossing removal information sessions are meant to be run by the Level Crossing Removal Authority, which is supposedly independent, to gain information. This is a disgrace to the Labor Party, and it is absolutely disgraceful behaviour by the member for Bentleigh. He has utilised this opportunity for his own political gain.
What will happen with the information that was collected? I think all constituents of Bentleigh would be very concerned. They provided their information with the singular intention of ensuring the wellbeing of their area. They want to receive the right information. This is an absolute disgrace to the member for Bentleigh. It is overreaching at very best. One would have to question what this information is going to be used for, and I ask the Premier to investigate this absolutely absurd and ridiculous action of the member for Bentleigh.
Caulfield electorate
Mr SOUTHWICK (Caulfield)—(Question 394) My question is to the Minister for Roads and Road Safety. The North Road, Ormond, level crossing removal is a vital project for my electorate of Caulfield which was announced and fully funded by the former coalition government in 2014. Local residents are concerned about the future of the Dorothy Avenue rail underpass, which may be removed as part of the North Road level grade separation, as it enables commuters to travel east–west through their neighbourhood and to two nearby schools.
I note the sham consultation process run by the member for Bentleigh, which did not allow many to attend the Dorothy Avenue meeting to talk about their concerns. We have certainly had a lack of consultation and transparency, with the only consultation run by the member for Bentleigh, which was an absolute sham. I ask: could the minister provide advice on whether the Dorothy Avenue rail underpass will remain or be removed as part of the North Road, Ormond, level crossing removal?
September 17, 2014
The Auditor General has released his long awaited report on the governance of the Trustees and the oversight management of the Department of Primary Industry on the crown land that constitutes the Caulfield Racecourse Reserve. We congratulate the Auditor General’s office for the report and for affirming what can only be described as a combination of blatant incompetence and vested interests that have been allowed to reign for far too long and to the detriment of the local community. No public office escapes unscathed. We will comment in greater detail once we’ve had time to fully digest the report. We’ve uploaded the full report HERE.
A scathing report reveals public parkland at the Caulfield Racecourse has not been managed well by the trustees.
PUBLIC parkland at the centre of the Caulfield Racecourse has been seriously mismanaged, a scathing Victorian Auditor-General report has found.
Auditor-General John Doyle’s scathing report, tabled in Parliament this morning, has found there was poor access to the public land, “significant’’ deficiencies in governance by the board of trustees, conflicts of interest among trustees that have not been managed well and more.
Mr Doyle said the 54-hectare site had been governed by 15 trustees whose decisions have “disproportionately favoured racing interests with insufficient attention paid to fulfilling the community-related purposes of the reserve’’.
The report says public space is not easily accessible, entry points and signage are inadequate, and although the reserve has recently been upgraded, it doesn’t address the community need for better recreational facilities within Glen Eira.
The report also calls for community consultation on what should be done with the reserve.
With a severe shortage of open space and sports grounds in Glen Eira, the council wants sports grounds developed on the reserve, which has a lake, grassed area, walking track and barbecue facilities.
“ … it is not clear that the needs of the community have been appropriately balanced against the needs of racing.’’ — Auditor-General John Doyle
The council has also argued the $80,000 annual rent the Trust charges the MRC is well under the independently valued rate of about $1 million.
Six trustees represent government, six represent the Melbourne Racing Club and three represent Glen Eira Council.
“There is no doubt that the reserve is a significant public asset and one of Australia’s premier racing tracks, hosting high-profile races such as the Caulfield Cup and bringing in significant revenue for the state. However, it is not clear that the needs of the community have been appropriately balanced against the needs of racing’’, Mr Doyle found.
Trust chairman Greg Sword welcomed the report, vowed to implement the recommendations, accepted criticism of conflict of interests historically and currently not managed well and said the Trust now had a blueprint for crucial improvements.“The VAGO points to significant conflict of interest and it is difficult,’’ he said.
“This provides the Trust, whether restructured or not, with a great blueprint for the way in which it should act in the future.’’
The DEPI has also accepted all recommendations relating to its role.
The news has drawn a quick response from Glen Eira councillor and former Trust chairman Jim Magee, who has for years lobbied for change to the way the reserve is managed.
“It’s absolutely scathing,’’ he said.
“It validates everything that we’ve said in the past. We now have to look to the Premier and the Opposition leader to implement all the recommendations.’’
Cr Jim Magee was the former Trust chairman.
It contains 15 recommendations to address those issues needing “immediate attention’’ and for the future management of the reserve.Five apply directly to the trustees of the Caulfield Racecourse Reserve, six to the Department of Environment and Primary Industries which oversees the performance of Crown land managers and four require joint action by the trustees and the department.
The VAGO says unless the issues can be addressed, alternative management arrangements over the reserve should be considered.
Mr Doyle says the Trust should be given the chance to introduce contemporary governance standards but if it fails or trustees cannot agree then other arrangements, such as a committee of management or a new trust under its own legislation, must be considered.
The Premier’s office has been approached for comment.
September 19, 2013

A “shattered” Margot Carroll speaking outside the Supreme Court with Francis Gallichio after the decision was handed down about 590 Orrong Rd, Armadale. Picture by Derrick den Hollander Source: News Limited
RESIDENTS who fought tooth and nail to stop a controversial high-rise development in Melbourne’s inner east are “shattered” by its approval.
The Supreme Court this morning dismissed an appeal of an earlier VCAT decision to approve the 12-storey, 448-apartment development at 590 Orrong Rd Armadale.
Orrong Group spokeswoman Margot Carroll said in theory, developer Lend Lease could start construction tomorrow.
“There will now be 1500-plus people coming into this small area. It is going to be like a little city. The impact is going to be enormous. Armadale’s population will increase by 10 per cent,” she said.
“We’re shattered”.
Stonnington Council Mayor Matthew Koce said Planning Minister Matthew Guy now needed to “step up” and residents and the council had been united in opposing the application.
“It is a dark day for democracy,” Cr Koce said.
“It has been a long wait (for this decision). It has been a long road. We need planning reform. No one wants a 13-storey building going up to their home.”
“I take my hat off to the Orrong Group. Margot Carroll has had her life on hold for four years.”
“It’s a really grim day for democracy. Residents know what is best for their local area.”
There is one last glimmer of hope for those fighting the development.
Planning Minster Matthew Guy is yet to sign off on a planning scheme amendment which would set a height limit of six storeys with a maximum of 250 units and 50 per cent coverage of the Orrong Rd site.
The amendment was passed by Stonnington Council in February, after going through an independent planning panel.
If approved, it would drastically reduce the scale of what Lend Lease can build.
10.30am: A CONTROVERIAL high-rise development in Armadale has been given the green light after a Supreme Court ruling this morning.
Justice Karin Emerton ruled the 12-storey development at 590 Orrong Rd, which will include 448 apartments up to 12 storeys and 18 townhouses, should proceed despite numerous objections from residents and Stonnington Council.
The council had challenged a Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal decision in April to approve the apartment complex, arguing the tribunal had made an error of law in failing to take into consideration the objections and having described them as an “irrelevant consideration”.
The council last year unanimously refused a permit due to the development size and design.
Developer Lend Lease then had the decision overturned at VCAT, despite 627 objections and the unanimous opposition of the council and local politicians.
In handing down her findings, Justice Emerton said VCAT had “comprehensively considered the merits of the proposal, based on proper planning consideration” and the appeal should be dismissed.
PS: See also – http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-19/supreme-court-rejects-bid-to-stop-armadale-development-because/4968098?section=vic
PPS: And from Stonnington Council itself –
The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal against VCAT’s decision to approve Lend Lease’s permit application for a major development at 590 Orrong Road and 4 Osment Street, Armadale.
Mayor, Cr Matthew Koce said: “This is a dark day for democracy.
“It is disappointing that Council’s appeal has been dismissed. The permit was unanimously rejected by the Council, local MPs, and residents. A massive 600 objections to the development were received on this planning application proposing 466 units at a height of up to 13 storeys.
“No-one wants a 13 storey monstrosity going up next to their home and VCAT’s decision to issue a permit despite more than 600 objections is devastating for the local community.
“Council took a stand in challenging VCAT’s decision in the Supreme Court and to advocate on behalf of the community for a sensible and responsible community outcome.
“I call on the State Government to urgently reform its planning system.
“The Minister must recognise community views and the angst that occurs when developments are imposed that are not in keeping with neighbourhood character.
“The Minister has the power to ensure planning controls are put in place, which reflect community views as part of the current residential planning zones reform.
“The City of Stonnington will continue to push for a positive outcome for residents concerned about the controversial Armadale development site.
“Residents have a right to speak up and be heard about what’s being built next door to them, especially when they’ll be living in the shadow of such a large overdevelopment of a key site.
“We are once again calling on the State Government to make a timely decision on the Planning Scheme Amendment that has been submitted to the Minister for approval.”
January 30, 2013
For nigh on a decade now, residents have been clamouring for this council to establish neighbourhood vegie gardens. Of course, all has fallen on deaf ears and nothing has been done. Well now we wish to introduce Council’s ‘accidental vegie patch’.
Following the desecration of the Elster Creek Trail, where vast stretches of green open space were turned into a stinking mess via the insane application of “commercial mulch”, locals have been having a grand time. Even with the regular poisoning of everything in sight, nature refuses to give up the ghost and insists on sticking her head up time and time again. But with new additions! Glen Eira is suddenly home to tomatoes, roses, pumpkins, zucchini, and other assorted vegies and plants. For this we have to thank the so called “commercial” mulch that was undoubtedly put down at great expense. So in spite of all its efforts to resist the start of a community vegie garden, nature has taken the matter out of council’s hands.
The tomatoes taste great!
January 9, 2013
Glen Eira Council has in the past distinguished itself through its less than staggering performance in the VEAC submission on open space. Now there is the formal submission to the Minister’s Planning Zone reforms. It is barely two and a half pages long.
We are not suggesting that length is commensurate with quality but, when one reads the following submissions, the detail and arguments provided certainly put Glen Eira’s effort to shame. Further, whilst the Glen Eira opus barely mentions third party rights, this is prominent in most of the other council submissions.
Port Phillip – 39 pages
Greater Geelong – 26 pages
Boroondara – 64 pages
Maribyrnong – 12
Brimbank – 18
Casey – 27
Manningham – 23
Frankston – 14
Melton – 49
Cardinia – 31
Bayside – 45
VLGA – 37
December 30, 2012
We extend best wishes to all our readers for a healthy and rewarding 2013. We especially thank all those individuals who have bothered to comment and all who have sent us emails of support and commendation. We would also be remiss if we did not thank our councillors and officers for their contributions. Their words and actions, as well as non-action, have provided plenty of fodder. We have no doubt this will continue!
2013 promises to be a landmark year as we’ve previously stated, with numerous vital policies up for determination. We will continue to analyse, comment, and attempt to ‘keep the bastards honest’. To our way of thinking, the current catchcry that we are ‘critical’ is a compliment. We will continue to be critical of all practices that are not transparent, that are conducted in secrecy and that fail to respect and truly represent residents. When shoddy, illogical and even puerile arguments are trotted out as justification for actions instead of facts and figures, we will continue to highlight these shortcomings.
Have a safe and happy holiday!
December 12, 2012
MR PAKULA — To move —
That this House notes that —
(1) the claim of the Member for Caulfield, Mr David Southwick, MP, in a media statement released on Friday 16 November 2012 was that he was only informed on that day that he did not complete all the points required for his Post Graduate Diploma in Marketing from Monash University;
(2) on Mr Southwick’s personal website, http://www.davidsouthwick.org, the entry of 16 October 2010 contains the claim that he graduated from Monash University with a Graduate Diploma in Marketing;
(3) on 19 October 2010, the same website had been altered, removing the claim to graduation and replacing it with a statement about having studied business and marketing at Monash Caulfield;
(4) the Member for Caulfield’s embellished claims continued to appear on the Liberal Party website and in the Parliamentary Handbook;
(5) the alteration to the Member for Caulfield’s personal website between 16 October 2010 and 19 October 2010 suggests that the Member has known for at least 2 years, and not for less than 2 weeks, that his claim to have graduated in marketing from Monash University is false; and calls on the Member for Caulfield to immediately stand down as Chair of the Education and Training Committee of the Parliament.
[Notice given on 27 November 2012 — Listed for 4 days].
487 MR BARBER — To move —
That this House requires the Minister for Planning to table in the Legislative Council by 12 noon on Tuesday, 5 February 2013, a copy of all public submissions received by the Department of Planning and Community Development in relation to the Reformed Zones for Victoria planning zones review.
[Notice given on 27 November 2012 — Listed for 4 days].
November 7, 2012
Join the local democracy
I knocked, I walked, I ran, I drove and 1203 citizens voted for Newton Gatoff. While not enough to get me elected to Glen Eira Council, I have found a wonderful community spirit alive and kicking across our city – with one big problem.
There were at least 13 per cent who spoiled their votes in Tucker Ward, who clearly didn’t want this election. Tucker’s voters returned the three incumbent councillors.
The new arrivals in Camden and Rosstown ward exude a palpable freshness. I cannot accept these elections should be compulsory.
Ban the mandatory vote (at least for local government elections), but let’s have a referendum on that.
And either get an electronic voting system or make it postal votes only in all local government areas. The election is ultimately more engaging if only tnose who want to, take part in it. We may be surprised how much more we can achieve from a positive democracy.
Newton Gatoff
An election thank-you
On Saturday October 27 I was humbled to be re-elected as a Glen Eira councillor for a second term.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those who voted for me. For those who did not vote for me, I will continue to serve you as your friend on council
Thank you for placing your trust in me.
Oscar Lobo
October 29, 2012
From: “Jill Esplan (Glen Eira RO)” <Jill.Esplan@vec.vic.gov.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:54:27 +1100
Subject: Computer count result.
Dear Candidates,
Please find attached the computer results of the 2012 Glen Eira election.
Congratulations to the successful candidates :
Camden : Michael Lipshutz, Mary Delahunty and Thomas Sounness
Rosstown: Margaret Esakoff, Karina Okotel and Neil Pilling
Tucker: Jamie Hyams, Oscar Lobo and Jim Magee.
The formal declaration will take place at 9am tomorrow morning at the Town Hall.
Regards,
Jill Esplan
Returning Officer
Glen Eira Council Election
ph. 9563 5013